- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yale Post Vaccination Syndrome Study - the Spike Protein is as Transient as Inflation
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:12 pm to jimmy the leg
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:12 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Malpractice is too kind.
Perhaps human rights abuse is a more appropriate term?
It's nothing short of criminal.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Absence of Kaposi's sarcoma etc. notwithstanding?
I don’t think it’s at all clear there isn’t a link to secondary cancers.
In fact, I believe the explosion in cancers “turbo” or otherwise particularly among the under 50 cohort needs to be studied closely to determine whether immuno suppression related to spike protein exposure is causing latent cancers to express that wouldn’t otherwise be an issue.
Cancer.org: cancer rate hits 2M for first time in 2024
But to be clear I don’t have any direct data yet to link the two other than the fact that the cancer rate increase occurred post mass vaccination so I won’t outright claim it’s a causal relationship, just that it’s very suspicious and requires investigation regardless of whether the cause is the vaccine or some other trigger such as chemical exposure.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:32 pm to Jbird
quote:
I saw my neighbor not allowed to see his dying wife.
All to win an election.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:37 pm to the808bass
Took him so he could look through a fricking window.
Old boy didn't drive anymore.
Old boy didn't drive anymore.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 4:27 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
I remember your posts when vaccine came out
Thanks. I remember yours as well.
You, me, Sloane ranger, Ronaldo bergundiaz(sp?), etc we were correct.
I think folks who've done science, or been closely exposed know how hard it is. We saw through the bullshite.
We were alarmed at the disregard for naturally acquired immunity, on and on.
Also, I recall discussion of the highly targeted nature of mRNA shots in particular. One protein vs response to the whole virus as in naturally acquired immunity. Of course these shots wouldn't be as strong towards infection prevention.
On the heart issues, I didn't know much on the physiology etc just that in prior trials there was an issue.
It all stunk to high heaven.
Such a bizarre time.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 10:16 am to tide06
quote:
You’re making a distinction without a difference.
So, you come out to your car to find two flat tires. One has a nail in it and the other has a blown out sidewall. Both are flat, but one is going to cost $20 to repair while the other forces you to buy a pair of tires. You are arguing that having similar symptoms (flat) are the same thing. Many things have similar symptoms from widely different causes.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 1:15 pm to LakeCharles
The disease is only now being studied and discussed.
It’s being referred to colloquially by researchers and others as vaccine induced AIDS.
I and everyone else agree that the cause is clearly not a virus as with AIDS so obviously you are correct in that it’s not the same disease, only very similar in its effects apparently.
However im far less concerned with the label being used to refer to it than I am the actual disease itself. If you dislike it you’ll have to take it up with the medical researchers and pundits working on it and discussing it.
It’s being referred to colloquially by researchers and others as vaccine induced AIDS.
I and everyone else agree that the cause is clearly not a virus as with AIDS so obviously you are correct in that it’s not the same disease, only very similar in its effects apparently.
However im far less concerned with the label being used to refer to it than I am the actual disease itself. If you dislike it you’ll have to take it up with the medical researchers and pundits working on it and discussing it.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:18 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:
I understand old people who weren't prior infected, worth risk.
That is why I got the shot - 83 yrs old and immunity degraded from prior chemotherapy and already battling years' long respiratory problems. I figured I didn't have to worry about any side effects decades from now.
Now I'm not so sure - I am still have chronic respiratory problems and suffering from debilitating fatigue. Wish I'd not taken it now - think the damned virus was more like the flu anyway.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 7:44 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:
But, people in 40s and below?
Why?
To be able to travel to meet my grandchild in England.
I had already been infected; I was an extraordinarily healthy 57 year old; I had no fear of covid and no fear of the vaccine. In retrospect, I was right about both. The people on the right who think healthy people need fear the vaccine are just like the people on the left who thought healthy people should fear covid. Both point to a vanishingly small number of problems with healthy people and parade them around like a gay pride banner.
Of course a healthy person should not take the vaccine, but that’s not because the vaccine is much to be feared; it’s because neither is covid.
Popular
Back to top

0






