Started By
Message

re: Yale Post Vaccination Syndrome Study - the Spike Protein is as Transient as Inflation

Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
21881 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Malpractice is too kind.

Perhaps human rights abuse is a more appropriate term?

It's nothing short of criminal.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20695 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Absence of Kaposi's sarcoma etc. notwithstanding?

I don’t think it’s at all clear there isn’t a link to secondary cancers.

In fact, I believe the explosion in cancers “turbo” or otherwise particularly among the under 50 cohort needs to be studied closely to determine whether immuno suppression related to spike protein exposure is causing latent cancers to express that wouldn’t otherwise be an issue.
Cancer.org: cancer rate hits 2M for first time in 2024

But to be clear I don’t have any direct data yet to link the two other than the fact that the cancer rate increase occurred post mass vaccination so I won’t outright claim it’s a causal relationship, just that it’s very suspicious and requires investigation regardless of whether the cause is the vaccine or some other trigger such as chemical exposure.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125636 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

I saw my neighbor not allowed to see his dying wife.


All to win an election.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85111 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 3:37 pm to
Took him so he could look through a fricking window.

Old boy didn't drive anymore.
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7774 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

I remember your posts when vaccine came out


Thanks. I remember yours as well.
You, me, Sloane ranger, Ronaldo bergundiaz(sp?), etc we were correct.

I think folks who've done science, or been closely exposed know how hard it is. We saw through the bullshite.
We were alarmed at the disregard for naturally acquired immunity, on and on.
Also, I recall discussion of the highly targeted nature of mRNA shots in particular. One protein vs response to the whole virus as in naturally acquired immunity. Of course these shots wouldn't be as strong towards infection prevention.

On the heart issues, I didn't know much on the physiology etc just that in prior trials there was an issue.

It all stunk to high heaven.

Such a bizarre time.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5351 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 10:16 am to
quote:

You’re making a distinction without a difference.


So, you come out to your car to find two flat tires. One has a nail in it and the other has a blown out sidewall. Both are flat, but one is going to cost $20 to repair while the other forces you to buy a pair of tires. You are arguing that having similar symptoms (flat) are the same thing. Many things have similar symptoms from widely different causes.


Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20695 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 1:15 pm to
The disease is only now being studied and discussed.

It’s being referred to colloquially by researchers and others as vaccine induced AIDS.

I and everyone else agree that the cause is clearly not a virus as with AIDS so obviously you are correct in that it’s not the same disease, only very similar in its effects apparently.

However im far less concerned with the label being used to refer to it than I am the actual disease itself. If you dislike it you’ll have to take it up with the medical researchers and pundits working on it and discussing it.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48158 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

I understand old people who weren't prior infected, worth risk.

That is why I got the shot - 83 yrs old and immunity degraded from prior chemotherapy and already battling years' long respiratory problems. I figured I didn't have to worry about any side effects decades from now.

Now I'm not so sure - I am still have chronic respiratory problems and suffering from debilitating fatigue. Wish I'd not taken it now - think the damned virus was more like the flu anyway.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52475 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

But, people in 40s and below?
Why?

To be able to travel to meet my grandchild in England.

I had already been infected; I was an extraordinarily healthy 57 year old; I had no fear of covid and no fear of the vaccine. In retrospect, I was right about both. The people on the right who think healthy people need fear the vaccine are just like the people on the left who thought healthy people should fear covid. Both point to a vanishingly small number of problems with healthy people and parade them around like a gay pride banner.

Of course a healthy person should not take the vaccine, but that’s not because the vaccine is much to be feared; it’s because neither is covid.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram