Started By
Message
locked post

Wuhan Institute of Virology Created COVID-19-Like Virus In 2007

Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:06 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123782 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:06 am
quote:



Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin
Wuze Ren, Xiuxia Qu, Wendong Li, Zhenggang Han, Meng Yu, Peng Zhou, Shu-Yi Zhang, Lin-Fa Wang, Hongkui Deng, Zhengli Shi
15 November 2007


ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as its receptor for cell entry. A group of SARS-like CoVs (SL-CoVs) has been identified in horseshoe bats. SL-CoVs and SARS-CoVs share identical genome organizations and high sequence identities, with the main exception of the N terminus of the spike protein (S), known to be responsible for receptor binding in CoVs. In this study, we investigated the receptor usage of the SL-CoV S by combining a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudovirus system with cell lines expressing the ACE2 molecules of human, civet, or horseshoe bat. In addition to full-length S of SL-CoV and SARS-CoV, a series of S chimeras was constructed by inserting different sequences of the SARS-CoV S into the SL-CoV S backbone. Several important observations were made from this study. First, the SL-CoV S was unable to use any of the three ACE2 molecules as its receptor. ...

... a minimal insert region (amino acids 310 to 518) was found to be sufficient to convert the SL-CoV S from non-ACE2 binding to human ACE2 binding
...

In this study, a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-based pseudovirus system was employed to address these issues. Our results indicated that the SL-CoV S protein is unable to use ACE2 proteins of different species for cell entry and that SARS-CoV S protein also failed to bind the ACE2 molecule of the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus pearsonii. However, when the RBD of SL-CoV S was replaced with that from the SARS-CoV S, the hybrid S protein was able to use the huACE2 for cell entry

=====================

CREDITS
This work was jointly funded by a State Key Program for Basic Research Grant (2005CB523004) from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology, a special fund from the president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. 1009), the Knowledge Innovation Program Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX1-YW-R-07) to Z. Shi, the Sixth Framework Program “EPISARS” of the European Commission, a National Nature Science Foundation of China for Creative Research group grant (30421004) to H. Deng, and the Australian Biosecurity CRC for Emerging Infectious Diseases (project 1.026RE) to L.-F. Wang.

Corresponding author. Mailing address for Z. Shi: State key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China. Phone: (86-27)-87197240. Fax: (86-27)-87197240. E-mail: zlshi@wh.iov.cn.


LINK
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:07 am to
Nuke them.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:11 am to
So virology testing is akin to "let me take a knife to myself and slice my arm open to see if I bleed"? Let's go make some germs so we can hopefully find a cure to kill those germs. I guess I'm too stupid to understand that philosophy.
This post was edited on 3/29/20 at 5:19 am
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29650 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:28 am to
shocked to learn this

Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:34 am to
quote:

... a minimal insert region (amino acids 310 to 518) was found to be sufficient to convert the SL-CoV S from non-ACE2 binding to human ACE2 binding


I had read the 2015 piece in Nature where they had created the chimeric version. This was not mentioned there. The news on "how" they did it is fascinating. Thanks for bringing it.
This post was edited on 3/29/20 at 5:36 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32213 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:47 am to
So why on earth would someone thinks it’s a good idea to manipulate a virus to make it invasive to the human body via the ACE2 protein? Just to prove it could be done? Also, since this was published in 2007, who reviews articles for this publication? How can this be news?

PS - my understanding is that folks on ACE inhibitors have a higher level ACE2 in their bodies lending some credence to their having a higher incidence of more severe symptoms.
This post was edited on 3/29/20 at 5:50 am
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:54 am to
frick China
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 5:58 am to
quote:

frick China


Of all the responses, kinda sums it up best.
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23483 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 6:13 am to
I work with viruses and my lab does these sort of experiments. This doesn’t proof at all COVID-19 was engineered as a bio weapon.
Just saying
Posted by Manlaw35
Member since Jan 2013
1302 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 6:15 am to
quote:

I work with viruses and my lab does these sort of experiments. This doesn’t proof at all COVID-19 was engineered as a bio weapon. Just saying


nuke your lab too
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22495 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 6:46 am to
Are Chinese really just heirs of Dr. Mengele? Charge of crimes against humanity could be justified if ever a connection is found between a Chinese lab and Covid-19.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123782 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 6:58 am to
quote:

I work with viruses and my lab does these sort of experiments. This doesn’t proof at all COVID-19 was engineered as a bio weapon.
Just saying

. . . . and?

We know CV19 is not a bioweapon, at least not one intentionally released.
Otherwise China would have a vaccine.

The question is whether it is a leaked product of one of their two Wuhan bioresearch labs. One of those labs, the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, just happens to be located 280 meters from the infamous Hunan Seafood Market.
Posted by dietcoke7
LA
Member since Aug 2007
1033 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 7:34 am to
I am not a scientist. What is the chance they were looking for a virus to target the elderly and infirm, those non productive in society.

Decrease the surplus population, just to see if it could be done, and it got out? Either accidentally or deliberately.

Cull the herd? Plenty of historical precedents for that.
Posted by uppermidwestbama
Member since Nov 2014
2097 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 7:37 am to
OP, this isn't anything new. Even labs here in the United States engineer viruses and other diseases to learn about them. It's the entire reason why we are developing quick tests in matter of weeks.

We went from the first cases confirmed in January to testing that can be done in 15 minues in mere weeks of lab testing/development. We know the genetic sequences of the covid viruses.

If Covid19 came around in 1918 like the Spanish Flu, it likely would have been as deadly or even more since it would have wipped out millions around the world with prior health issues. But with communication like it is today, we are able to shutoff access immediatly, saving lives.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48848 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 7:38 am to
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 7:41 am to
quote:

If Covid19 came around in 1918 like the Spanish Flu, it likely would have been as deadly or even more since it would have wipped out millions around the world with prior health issues. But with communication like it is today, we are able to shutoff access immediatly, saving lives.


With communication like it is today we would have lost the first world war
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34870 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 7:45 am to
quote:

I am not a scientist. What is the chance they were looking for a virus to target the elderly and infirm, those non productive in society.


And as a bonus, take out Trump's Base.

The Militarization of Bio Tech is inevitable; and the inadvertent loosing of such on the population as well. We all know what China is capable of; think Mao.

Fermi Paradox. Interesting times.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 8:02 am to
Oh my god.


It’s actually true. They really did make it.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16305 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 8:04 am to
Not discounting you, but how did you find that article? I tried searching on the ASM JoV and it doesn't show up.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68046 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 8:05 am to
quote:

 - my understanding is that folks on ACE inhibitors have a higher level ACE2 in their bodies lending some credence to their having a higher incidence of more severe symptoms
I've also seen where being on an ACE inhibitor may provide a protective effect. One theory suggests that the upregulation of ACE2 allows for too many virions to enter the cell at one time therefore overwhelming the cell's ability to help replicate the virus. The other suggests that the ACE2 is bound shut until Angiotensin2 approaches. If your Angiotensin2 is low because of an ACE Inhibitor, the ACE2 receptor stays bound shut longer because less Angiotensin2 is around.

Seems like almost completely opposite reasons for the proposed benefit.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram