Started By
Message

re: Would you rather? ( Border wall related)

Posted on 12/21/17 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by BigD13
French Settlement La
Member since Sep 2013
2591 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 12:36 pm to
Wall

For the Melt
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

No a dime spent on the wall. That's my wish. The Wall is a horrible idea.

What are some of your suggestion for stopping the criminal filth that is pouring across the borders? Just curious.

You do recognize the problems brought on by the criminal aliens, don't you?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56125 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 12:44 pm to
Let me ponder that for a sec. I live in Arkansas. You figure it out.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74147 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 12:47 pm to
Federals handle Federal problems and States handle State problems.

Then they all fight for funding.

How it works.
Posted by burdhead
WOMP WOMP!!
Member since Apr 2017
6008 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 12:57 pm to
the wall, and shoot the ones that try to climb it
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
21898 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:08 pm to
Border wall
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Forks make people fat, dont they?

lol and walls stop trespassers right?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


lol and walls stop trespassers right?




actually yes, they do.

thats the point of them.

fricking imbecile.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
26419 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:15 pm to
Both
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:17 pm to
quote:


actually yes, they do.

thats the point of them.

fricking imbecile.

and that's why they've been tunneling in since they started putting them up. but i'm sure trumps wall will handle that.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23055 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Would you rather the federal government finance (A.) the border wall at various locations from Texas to California OR (B.) the completion Comite River Divergent Canal/ or Amite River flood control infrastructure project AND a major interstate project to alleviate BR traffic woes on I10/I12 such as the proposed "Loop" that would divert I10 traffic down Airline HWY instead of through the heart of Baton Rouge that affects daily commuters?


Border wall will save US taxpayers 10 to 20 billion a year for the next couple of decades.

Your proposal can be paid for by the savings from not paying social services to illegals every year to infinity after the wall is built!
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:19 pm to
this basically boils down to would you rather your money protect you or would you rather flush it down the drain for political gain
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

this basically boils down to would you rather your money protect you or would you rather flush it down the drain for political gain


I was thinking the same thing..

In regards to obama giving millions of cash to Iran right as he walked out of the office instead of donating any of that to the victims of Flynt’s water cirsis..
Posted by TigerBait201
Member since Sep 2017
31 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:29 pm to
Aren't there maintenance costs for the wall as well? It's not just one upfront cost and then you don't worry about it, like insulation.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
16978 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

I would rather the government help pay for projects that I will directly benefit from on a daily basis


I'm confused about why maintenance of Federal Interstates, and Federal Navigable Waterways (both of which are part of Federal Infrastructure) are not Federal Issues.

I voted to MAGA so we can (1) Build the Wall; (2) get rid of ObamaCare; (3) Lower Taxes; (4) Kill ISIS and salt the earth on which Islamic Terrorists Roam; and (5) Improve our Crumbling Infrastructure.

So yes to Wall. And yes to I12. Yes to Amite. If the River Runs through your state. Let's make sure your flood zones are taken care of. If the Interstate runs through your state. Let's make sure it is maintained - and usable.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
85987 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:35 pm to
the wall is fine in theory (or some other more effective version of "the wall).

my question is whether it is a top priority. I don't think it is, but now that we've met a stalemate on Obamacare and notched a tax rewrite, maybe the time is coming.

But, I do think there are a ton of people who are largely immune from illegal immigration issues who got suckered in to believing it's of the upmost importance to their lives. Ignoring, of course, that there are many many more takers among white and black Americans than illegal immigrants from Mexico or Central America.

As a result, you have "criminal filth" being used to describe a large swath of people who don't fit that category. Isolated examples of immigrant crime are held up as the norm. That's a dangerous tactic and one I don't support.

In truth, we need a secure border. But it's less of a crisis than it has been in a while, and the rhetoric often doesn't match that reality.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57897 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:46 pm to
Our house flooded last year, we live outside of the flood zone (so we didn't have flood insurance) and both my wife and I commute from the Millerville area to downtown and back every day.

With that said, I would prefer the border wall because it serves a far, far larger good. Ideally we would do both though.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
16978 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Y'all realize most illegals drive or fly right into this country legally and just never leave right.


We need a Wall. We need a literal wall. But we also need a figurative wall. And we also need a legal wall; that punishes not only the illegally immigrating with nothing other than deportation, but that also punishes the behavior enticing illegal immigration (by sanctioning employers, landlords, and prohibiting welfare benefits of any kind to illegal immigrants).

The literal Wall is a deterrent. A visible deterrent that shows people we mean business. It is also a literal deterrent in that while there are people who come here, then illegally overstay their visa, THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT SWIM ACROSS THE RIVER. Can't we at the very least try to slow them down while they are building tunnels or ladders or whatever else so we can catch them while they are slowed down and throw them back over it?

Speed bumps work in reducing speed. There is a place for them, just like a place for the wall.

A wall would be expensive, but not near as expensive as the entire government system ignoring the problem and now feeding, clothing and educating a huge percentage of the Third World. The wall would be worth every damn cent.
This post was edited on 12/21/17 at 1:53 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram