Started By
Message

re: Would have siding with Hitler prevented the Holocaust? Ted Cruz weighing in now.

Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:03 am to
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39183 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:03 am to
There's no doubt we were correct in fighting the Nazis. What is not so clear (in hindsight) is did we need to help Soviet Russia to the extent we did. With our huge economic and manufacturing resources, we were never going to lose that war. It may have been in our best interests to let Nazi Germany wreck Stalinist Russia more before we whipped them.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7279 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

There's no doubt we were correct in fighting the Nazis.


Respectfully, this is part of the Post-War Consensus that is being reexamined and exhumed. There is, indeed, doubt that the US was correct in choosing to side with the Soviets.

It's not entirely revisionist history. We move further from the emotionalism that is tied to the conflict, yes, but there were absolutely people who argued this position both during the war itself, and in its immediate aftermath.

It is good to have these kinds of sober discussions. Without them, history becomes mythical- and that is dangerous for s free people who can no longer recognize propaganda.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39183 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:20 am to
quote:

There is, indeed, doubt that the US was correct in choosing to side with the Soviets.


You're missing my point. I think we were correct in fighting the Nazis. We could have done that without aiding the Soviets one iota. No aid to the Soviets, they can't push west. After we defeat Germany, there is no Soviet occupation of the Warsaw Pact countries, thus no Cold War. In fact, with the inevitable arse kicking the Soviet regime takes from Germany without our help, it's not unreasonable to think the USSR crumbles and tears apart - much like Imperial Russia after the First World War. It's a fascinating "what if".
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7279 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

You're missing my point.


Nah, we're just discussing over each other.

I agree that we shouldn't have aided the Soviets, at all. That FDR was in bed with Stalin the way that he was is one of the more shameful chapters of the 20th century.

My original point was that there was, indeed doubt that we should have fought the Third Reich. You disagree, and hold that we undoubtedly should have.

I'd venture we'd agree on more than we disagree, but where we differ is respectful nuance.
Posted by BuckI
Grove City, Ohio
Member since Oct 2020
7116 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:37 am to
quote:

At least the Nazis were killing the people who were promoting communism and degeneracy. The Soviets murdered Christians.
That makes it all alright then.

quote:

Also, the Nazis tried to just make them leave first...nobody would take them
How sporting of Hitler to give them a chance.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66696 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:29 am to
Lies and projection. Typical
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 9:32 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:33 am to
Who we sided with is a matter of historical circumstance. It was not a calculation based on who was more evil.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14683 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:34 am to
quote:

They are killing an ethnic group to take their property at little slower pace than the Holocaust.


So, you'd consider the Israeli hostages as property of the Palestinians?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112703 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:37 am to
No.

But the USA and other countries accepting Jewish refugees before the war might have (at least, where Jews are concerned...remember there were a shitton of non-Jews exterminated by the Nazis).

That said, considering the pre- and post-WWII Cold War with the USSR (yes, it had started before the war), an argument could be made that the West chose the wrong side.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
21569 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:50 am to
The majority of the SS guards at Auschwitz were Ukrainian SS, 90% of whom were never arrested, let alone prosecuted. Where did thy go post war? Back home. And because of the numbers, many forget that in addition to the millions of Jews he murdered, when Hitler invaded Poland, the first groups he went after....murdered....were the intellectuals, university professors & students, successful business magnates, the trade unions, the artists in all their forms, & of course the Communists. Not saying that Stalin was a good guy, his stats don't lie, either. But being Hitler's ally, don't forget his other ally, Japan, was responsible for the Rape of Shanghai, the Baton Death March, the feeding of Australian POWs to sharks, the beheadings of American POWs.
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
6098 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:50 am to
We really need Ted-Tucker part II
Posted by Lexis Dad
Member since Apr 2025
5669 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:59 am to
What kind of timeline are we in where Ted motherfricking Cruz is the voice of reason?

Fascist/Nazi gets thrown around so loosely nowadays that the plot has been lost but I think that little twerp Carlson is an actual fascist or at the least, a sympathizer. His behavior/comments in the recent past seem to support that.
Posted by Lexis Dad
Member since Apr 2025
5669 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:03 am to
quote:

It may have been in our best interests to let Nazi Germany wreck Stalinist Russia more before we whipped them.

Can't disagree.

But Russia being on our side in WW2 was the classic "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" scenario. War does make strange bedfellows but this one will always be debated. Hell, Stalin and FDR had respect (albeit begrudgingly) for one another.

We should have listened to Patton.
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
26257 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I don't think it's controversial to say that the Soviets were objectively worse than the Nazis.


100%.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39183 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:10 am to
People also think Churchill was our BFF. Churchill had one goal, and one goal only, in WWII: preservation of the British Empire. If that meant sacrificing every American GI to do it, oh well. Why do you think he kept pushing all those ridiculous side quests (Palestine, Syria, Iran, Greece, etc) under the notion of the "soft underbelly"? I'm sure it has nothing to do with all the British possessions there. He was still in opposition to the Overlord invasion in '44; still advocating for indirect assault on Fortress Europa. George C. Marshall put his foot down and basically told him Normandy was happening.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 11:12 am
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
26257 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

There's no doubt we were correct in fighting the Nazis. What is not so clear (in hindsight) is did we need to help Soviet Russia to the extent we did. With our huge economic and manufacturing resources, we were never going to lose that war. It may have been in our best interests to let Nazi Germany wreck Stalinist Russia more before we whipped them.


We basically leased the Red Army to defeat Germany. 80% of German casualties occurred on the Eastern front. Probably saved a lot of American lives.

The lend lease went on longer than it should have. Stalin used it to bolster Mao and to defeat Chiang kai-shek in China.

FDR administration was full of communists or communist sympathizers.
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2060 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:15 am to
One thing people seem to forget is that the full extent of the Holocaust wasn't known until after the war. We didn't go to war with Germany because of the Holocaust. We went to war with Germany because they were taking over Europe, and also because after Pearl Harbor Germany declared war on us. Some say that is when Germany lost the war because there was no reason for Hitler to declare war on us just because we declared war on Japan.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7279 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:23 am to
quote:

FDR administration was full of communists or communist sympathizers.


This is correct.

FDR didn't have a begrudging relationship with Stalin. He absolutely loved the guy.
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
1979 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:25 am to
quote:

where does this come from?


Nazis played a significant role in the violent overthrow of the democratically elected government. Essentially "right wing" Ukrainian nationalists.

I don't know if these guys were pro-European integration, but they were definitely opposed to closer ties with Russia, and when Ukraine accepted the Russian trade deal over a deal with the EU, these Nazis started the violence that would lead to the overthrow of the government.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39183 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Probably saved a lot of American lives.


Devil's Advocate: would sending the massive amount of aid that went to the Soviets to the American military instead have resulted in more/less/same casualties (IOW, we fight a stronger Germany because Russia is weaker w/o our help, but our military is much stronger w/o siphoning off resources to Russia)? All while ending up with a much weaker/broken up post-war USSR? And is that calculus worth it even with increased American losses?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram