Started By
Message

re: Would democrats confirm 2020 election fraud if…

Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48447 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Wash that steak down with some Trump vodka, the why not sign up for a few classes at Trump university then treat yourself to a vacation booked on GoTrump.com


Now do his successful companies. Guess how many there are. You think you are dunking on a billionaire who is one of 45 to ever be President is hilarious. What’s your resume, dummy?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48447 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Some of the state SOS acted outside of the state legislators’ explicit directives, in order to achieve more voters’ access during the pandemic. True. I’m sure it pissed people off who wanted to restrict voting access and discourage mail in voting.


Complete bullshite. Election laws are in place for a reason. Trying to justify sate SoSs acting beyond their authority is trying to justify illegal acts.
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1145 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:44 pm to
I’m sure he’s in a financial position to make fun of a billionaire. The arrogance of these progressives demonstrates a personal unawareness. Love when they call Musk an idiot
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49705 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Can't confirm something that didn't happen.



Yeah,right
81 million
Most votes Ever
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
5583 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Complete bullshite. Election laws are in place for a reason. Trying to justify sate SoSs acting beyond their authority is trying to justify illegal acts.


Prosecute them if they broke the law. That’s not fraud, though.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9198 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

The unilateral changes the states SOS’s made to mass mail in voting alone is a fraud. The constitution left election laws up to state legislatures. Not state administrations.

And that DID happen. Can’t dispute it.


Also can't dispute the censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop wasn't election interference, nor the feds pressuring social media to censor opposing viewpoints.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2305 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

This has been audited and played out in the courts already. No significant fraud that would impact the results.


No, it hasn't played out in courts with evidence being considered and made public. Most of the challenges were dismissed on bullshite procedural grounds. Not from lack of evidence. Nerd.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16746 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

This has been audited and played out in the courts already.


You’re correct - it has - so far. And no court was willing to rule an entire election unconstitutional. Because that would have been the result. So they said “no standing” to toss it out.

But it’s black and white. The states that modified election laws outside of the state legislatures were unconstitutional.
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 3:10 pm
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24829 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Can't confirm something that didn't happen.

You can certainly ignore the mountainous stacks of incontrovertible evidence that it did happen.

I see that's clearly the angle you're rolling with.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72747 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Can't confirm something that didn't happen.




what a waste of oxygen you are jagoff



MUH NO FRAUD!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72747 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

quote:
Imagine being this uninformed and useless. A waste of oxygen occurred when your mom gave birth.



Imagine being a sensitive little bitch who thinks someone with a different opinion is useless... you don't have to imagine do you.




your opinion is WORTHLESS jagoff because there is evidence of fraud all over. you are in denial like a commie. DELUSIONAL with ZERO CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72747 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:44 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 3:45 pm
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
19830 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:58 pm to
Commie
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72747 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:06 pm to
lol
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10953 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 11:03 pm to
It doesn’t matter what democrats say. It matters what courts say.

And that was pretty clear.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
9194 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 11:17 pm to
You love dick.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
85814 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:07 am to
quote:

This has been audited and played out in the courts already. No significant fraud that would impact the results.


Bull shite. The two officers that denied the request From Meadows, and not Pence, report directly to pelosi.

That’s why the MSM insists she didn’t deny it. In reality Mayor Bowser
LINK
Go to 4:15


first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram