- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Rudy be made whole after the revelations in Fulton County, Georgia?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:50 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:50 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
One would think that a lawyer would understand that choosing a strategy designed to attempt to gain an advantage in a trial and that strategy succeeding are two different things.
What does this have to do with what Rudy did?
There was no "advantage in a trial" to what Rudy did. In fact, it avoided a trial on the facts by conceding in full.
He gained no advantage in the damages portion by this concession/admission.
2
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does this have to do with what Rudy did? There was no "advantage in a trial" to what Rudy did. In fact, it avoided a trial on the facts by conceding in full. He gained no advantage in the damages portion by this concession/admission.
That's retarded.
Also on brand.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:315K uncertified votes in Fulton Co say otherwise.
The statement that's it's been confirmed Dems stole the election, for starters
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:53 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
That's retarded.
I'm not shocked you're confused.
What advantage did Rudy gain?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In fact, it avoided a trial on the facts by conceding in full.
Are you being obtuse on purpose?
Isn't that exactly why most people "admit" guilt? When they feel like they have no case (which is very different than actually doing whatever it was you "admitted" to).
quote:
He gained no advantage in the damages portion by this concession/admission.
Then you tell me. Why did he do it? Even if it was just to spare himself the ordeal of the trial, he still "admitted" something to gain an advantage. Even if that advantage was personal and not legal.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:55 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
315K uncertified votes in Fulton Co say otherwise.
I hope you're not just reading Twitter and read the actual story on this.
How would poll workers fricking up and potentially invalidating 300k votes much more likely to be DEM, help steal the election?
Now, the discussion on how GA should have handled these votes is a separate one from any discussion using a version of the verb "steal"
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:56 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Muh NO PROOF!!!
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What advantage did Rudy gain?
Avoided trial.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:57 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Isn't that exactly why most people "admit" guilt? When they feel like they have no case
They typically gain an advantage by doing so, like the example I already gave you (plea deal for lesser sentence)
quote:
Why did he do it?
I still don't know. It's utterly baffling.
My assumption was brain damage from long term alcoholism, which explains a lot of his idiocy from 2016 onward.
Case in point:
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You should ignore the OP because it's being dishonest
Proof is muh NO PROOF, according to those afflicted with extreme TDS.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not shocked you're confused.
Quit deluding yourself.
Although, also on brand.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:59 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Avoided trial.
And how did that help him, exactly?
People will settle to minimize losses and avoid trial, because the point of avoiding trial is to control potential losses. Same with taking plea deals. You control the consequences of the admission.
His admission did nothing for his damage portion.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:59 pm to TDTOM
But, if he had hard proof of wrongdoing, wouldn’t he want this to come out in discovery?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:59 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Proof is muh NO PROOF,
This story is not proof. I'm assuming you've only read posts from MAGA content creators.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes, me pointing out dishonest MAGA echo chamber nonsense is a thing I do on here often.
What a clown.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 1:59 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
But, if he had hard proof of wrongdoing, wouldn’t he want this to come out in discovery?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And how did that help him, exactly? People will settle to minimize losses and avoid trial, because the point of avoiding trial is to control potential losses. Same with taking plea deals. You control the consequences of the admission. His admission did nothing for his damage portion.
Ahh he conceded to the scoundrels to simply correct the record.
Makes sense.
To retards.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:00 pm to Placekicker
TDSFP says, “NUH UH!!! REEEE!!!”
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:01 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Ahh he conceded to the scoundrels to simply correct the record.
....nobody said that. You seem confused. Again.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And how did that help him, exactly?
Avoided legal fees.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News