Started By
Message

re: Why is Alec Baldwin responsible for murder?

Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:01 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

”Ignorance of the law is no defense", but ignorance of fact is a defense.
quote:

Civil suits don't require the mens rea, so the victims' families could sue and have a good shot at winning, since the actus reus is pretty much beyond question now, and the burden shifts from "beyond reasonable doubt" to "the preponderance of the evidence" (i.e. it's more likely than not that he did it).
This may be the smartest post I have ever seen from you.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

He killed her because she was about to expose child trafficking. Just like Anne Heches mysterious death
FFS

“Halyna, just set-up your work station directly behind this camera, so that I can pretend to shoot you by accident.”
This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
36865 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

How tf do you dummies think movies are made, every action movie shoots guns with blanks AT people.
Even at the cinematographer?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293632 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

He pulled the trigger while pointing at someone.


Thats grossly incompetent. To the point of it being almost unimaginable for an adult to do.
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

He did intend to shoot a possibly working gun, as he knew that there were live rounds used in that very gun on that very set. He knew this, and how it violated protocol, for which he was responsible as the boss, but he recklessly fired it anyway.
My exact words were "reasonably possibly working". Any gun has a non-zero chance of being loaded, but if it's a 1% chance that's reasonably possible; 0.000001% is not reasonable. However, I'd agree that the knowledge that there were live rounds fired on the set (Lord knows why) would put that into the realm of "reasonably possible".
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141142 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:08 pm to
I’m don’t think his culpability isn’t “murder”.

But it is certainly “negligence”.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293632 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

How tf do you dummies think movies are made, every action movie shoots guns with blanks AT people.


Ignorant.

Even in movies, they don't point directly at someone. When they use a firearm in the movies, there's protocols which were not followed here.

Even a blank can kill you in the right place (Temple) so they do NOT aim directly at actors.

Posted by GWM
Member since Aug 2021
1565 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:13 pm to
nothing to see here..........
This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 4:15 pm
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

He was criminally negligent

I don't know what the standards are in this particular case for "criminally negligent". I would imagine it balances the odds of something going wrong with the gravity of the consequences. Doing something innocent like swatting a mosquito that sets off a Rube Goldberg chain of events that end in someone dying doesn't end up being criminally negligent just because of the result. It may depend on his background. I am meticulous with my guns, just double-checked 10 handguns because I used 4 of them yesterday before storing them from range bags. Dumbass Baldwin may not have known to always treat a gun as though it were loaded, but if he did, then your opinion holds more and more weight. I'm not really disagreeing with you, just pointing out that it's not so easy to tell from what info we have. Aside from not wishing the worst for his one conservative brother, I think Alec could get the electric chair for jaywalking and and I'd bring the popcorn.
This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 4:28 pm
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62432 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:23 pm to
Too bad for Alec the crime didn’t happen in LA.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Too bad for Alec the crime didn’t happen in LA.
Why? He will not be charged in New Mexico, either.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Ignorant.

Even in movies, they don't point directly at someone.






Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
16617 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 5:07 pm to
Bait
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28473 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Did he check the gun?


Clearly, he did not, so...

quote:

Not exactly clear cut.


It most certainly is clear cut.
Posted by MidWestGuy
Illinois
Member since Nov 2018
1793 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Ignorant.

Even in movies, they don't point directly at someone.


Clearly, he meant point directly and shoot a blank. As has been pointed out, even a true blank can be dangerous, even fatal.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26768 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Can you link to anything establishing that Baldwin was aware of this purported activity, or participated in it?


No, mensa, which is why I qualified it with "if what I've read is true". I'm not trying him in a court of law, I'm giving my opinion on his personal responsibility if what I've read is accurate. Since nobody knows anything about this case aside from what they've read, are you suggesting that we shouldn't even be discussing it or forming opinions? And if so, does that include your opinion?
Posted by MRF
Member since Dec 2021
822 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 7:30 pm to
What is the point of this series of images? Do you know these were functional firearms? If yes, these would be wildly unsafe. I suspect most or all of these were not functional.
This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 7:32 pm
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
27880 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

It was an accident. I know you all wanna hang the dude. I can't stand the douchebag myself... But obviously it was a terrible accident.

Alec Baldwin didn't set out to murder some grip that day.

Halyna Hutchins was never a grip, she was a cinemaographer on this film, and mostly held director of photography type roles before this. And it wasn't an accident. He intentionally pointed a loaded weapon at her and pulled the trigger.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62432 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 7:39 pm to
Because he pointed a pistol at a woman, pulled the trigger, now she's dead.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62432 posts
Posted on 8/21/22 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Why? He will not be charged in New Mexico, either.



It's beginning to look like that, isn't it? Let's hope there are enterprising defense attorneys in New Mexico who will use the "Alec Baldwin Defense" should they have clients in the same situation.

This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 7:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram