Started By
Message

re: Why is abortion so important to the Left?

Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:11 pm to
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61303 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

The left loves freedom that’s why.
I'm assuming that's supposed to be sarcasm

Posted by Not of the World
Member since Oct 2022
51 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:50 pm to
1 Corinthians 2:10-16
English Standard Version
10 these things God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God. 11 For who knows a person's thoughts except the spirit of that person, which is in him? So also no one comprehends the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. 12 Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might understand the things freely given us by God. 13 And we impart this in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who are spiritual.[a]

14 The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. 15 The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. 16 “For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
23077 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:22 am to
quote:

Years ago, three gray whales missed the “we gotta bug out before the encroaching ice pack closes and we die” message.

The liberal/progressive/trust science/types who aggressively advocated abortion as a constitutional right and had no qualms about the slaughtered millions resulting as a consequence fully embraced the plight of the three wayward whales. They had to be saved.

I argued in editorial sections that Evolution had spoken. They were too stupid (evolutionarily speaking of course) to stay alive. Why should they be allowed to poison the gray whale gene pool? Why were obviously flawed whale lives worthy of saving and millions of unborn human lives, with untold reservoirs of potential, deemed worthy only of the brutality of murder by dismemberment or chemical scalding while yet alive? Shouldn’t those lives be saved? It was schizophrenic then and it’s schizophrenic now.

Scientists, activists, and politicians made televised pilgrimages to the rapidly shrinking hole in the ice the confused cetaceans called home. A joint Soviet/US rescue effort ensued. A helicopter. A barge. Finally two Soviet ice breakers. They broke through to the poor creatures who were expected to follow them out to open waters. Something of a fiasco ensued with whales getting cut and bloodied by ice shards. The death of the youngest whale was tragic and the other two simply disappeared. Though they both were in bad condition, it was declared they had probably survived and the rescue effort deemed a success.

Just seeing your epic reply and had to post. Cheers to you good sir and LOL at that ridiculous story.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32254 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:28 am to
quote:

So why is abortion so important to the Left?
Because the "right" being right is against it.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13901 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:42 am to
quote:

I'm assuming that's supposed to be sarcasm
You assume correctly although the commie liberals do tout abortion, “a woman’s right to choose,” as freedom.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Why is abortion so important to the Left?

Bc they hate black people
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41682 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 9:46 am to
quote:

That doesn't make them inherently useful.
Doesn't make axioms useful? What do you mean? Everyone has presuppositions or axioms that they assume first and use to shape their worldviews. They are useful for this reason alone.

quote:

You feel a need to appeal to an authority because you think we must have all the answers.
Everyone needs to appeal to an authority of some source in order to know anything. In this humanistic/materialistic society, we see that the appeal to mankind generally as that authority, and scientists and other "experts" more specifically.

Everyone wants to know the "why" for existence and functioning within it, and the current authorities we have cannot provide the "why", only the "what" (at least as far as their naturalistic materialism can do that). There has always been a need for the "why" and there will always be that need.

quote:

That's where gods came from. It was a convenient way to explain what we didn't know, and an absolute to establishing control over the uneducated masses.
The gods came from a perversion of our desire to worship in accordance with the purpose that we were given when God created us. That doesn't change and that hasn't changed. We just shifted our focus from deities to ourselves. We create and worship gods like Anthony Fauchi, Nancy Pelosi, and CNN, who say they have our best interests in mind, seem to have all the answers, and have the power to control us which we gladly give them.

"What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun" -Ecc 1:19

quote:

We grow further away from needing a deity every day, not because of sin or whatever other bull shite you'll claim, but because of knowledge and education.
I disagree. In addition to what I just said about shifting worship from gods to men, people in general are moving away from formal religion and to spirituality generally. It's not that people are moving from a focus on the immaterial to the material, or from the supernatural to the natural. There's a greater interest in the occult right now compared to recent history in the West. People gravitate towards the spiritual because we are spiritual beings. Education has nothing to do with it because knowledge and education about the material world cannot explain everything, as much as materialists want it to.

quote:

Society establishes this, not any god. That's why we see different moral systems across different belief systems. It's entirely subjective because it can't be anything else.
As much as we would like to think that society establishes morality, it doesn't. The only reason why the Nazi's were able to convince most of a country to accept the extermination of an entire group of people is by convincing them that those people weren't actually people. Those same Nazis and Nazi supporters would not be OK with the SS coming into their own homes and taking away their own families for extermination, because they knew that murder was morally wrong, objectively. The proof is that people live like that is the case. No one ever says, "boy, theft, rape, and murder are very uncomfortable actions and I don't personally like it, but I believe in subjective morality and therefore don't have a basis to condemn theft, rape, and murder as objectively wrong". No, everyone knows they are wrong even if their worldviews don't allow for objective morality to exist. They are walking contradictions, and it's why I believe such a worldview is preposterous. We all live in God's world, and everyone has to borrow from God's reality in order to live in their own.

quote:

Then you should carry the discussion with that in mind. You can proselytize all you like, but at the end of the day, that's all you're doing. Your words have no value outside of your own beliefs.
If your worldview, no words have any value outside of each individual's own beliefs. If we're all just more evolved star dust, then meaning doesn't objectively exist. All meaning is created in the minds of the individual based on their own interpretation of reality.

My goal is to proselytize, because without it, there will be many souls that will remain lost and suffering in Hell for eternity. Apologetics (defending the Christian faith) is of little value if it doesn't have the ultimate goal of providing the gospel to others. Telling you that you're wrong is useless if I don't tell you what is right.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Doesn't make axioms useful?


Inherently useful. Simply stating what they are and that they are sometimes useful doesn't make it inherently true in this case.

quote:

Everyone needs to appeal to an authority of some source in order to know anything.


That's what religion necessitates, sure. But it isn't required, and we should always strive to avoid it.

quote:

The gods came from a perversion of our desire to worship


Yours included.

quote:

I disagree. In addition to what I just said about shifting worship from gods to men, people in general are moving away from formal religion and to spirituality generally. It's not that people are moving from a focus on the immaterial to the material, or from the supernatural to the natural. There's a greater interest in the occult right now compared to recent history in the West. People gravitate towards the spiritual because we are spiritual beings. Education has nothing to do with it because knowledge and education about the material world cannot explain everything, as much as materialists want it to.


Spirituality doesn't require a deity.

quote:

As much as we would like to think that society establishes morality, it doesn't.


Yes it does. Society, knowledge, and belief decide a moral system.

quote:

If your worldview, no words have any value outside of each individual's own beliefs. 


Incorrect. We're still bound by fear, ignorance, and the lines drawn by society.
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
29098 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:27 am to
Because Liberals love murder and hate children. Double win for those psychopaths.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
7298 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:29 am to
Because they've been indoctrinated by TV man and woman to believe that children are:

A boat anchor stopping you from being free to get away for a trip

A financial commitment

A burden to a woman's career

A useful tool for a woman to suck the financial blood out of a man

Time consuming

A personal responsibility



Many don't even want children (and by the looks of some, those hideous monsters ain't getting knocked up anyway), it's why they're so adamant about controlling yours. That way they get to remake in their image without the responsibility of rearing a child into the world.

Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5853 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:30 am to
God or Jesus? because we all know the new testiment was written after Jesus died and the whole thing is someone else recalling this words.....a roman emporer and his schollars no less
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140539 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Spirituality doesn't require a deity.


What does it require?
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41682 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Inherently useful. Simply stating what they are and that they are sometimes useful doesn't make it inherently true in this case.
Yes it does. It's exactly how we make our way through the reality we live in. We have to trust that there are certain fundamental truths that exist in order for us to make sense of things. That's where axioms come in. They are the bedrock for understanding reality. That's extremely useful, which is why everyone has them and uses them to formulate worldviews. Even you do this (because everyone does).

quote:

That's what religion necessitates, sure. But it isn't required, and we should always strive to avoid it.
Why "should" anyone do anything in your worldview? Where does the "ought" come from when all people are cosmic accidents and there is no greater authority in this universe? Do what you want, then die. It doesn't matter. The conclusion is Nihilism, because there is no inherent, objective purpose to life in that worldview.

And we appeal to authority because we aren't God. We are not omniscient nor are we omnipresent. We certainly aren't omnipotent. We are weak, fallible, ignorant creatures, and we cannot know all things, so we look to others to do that for us to varying degrees. It's why people put their trust in politicians, scientists, and supposed experts in various fields, because no person has the ability to know everything there is to know about any one thing, much less all things. And this is true for each individual, so it's not like each generation improves.

There's only so much information our brains can absorb and retain, and that doesn't change by having access to newer and more information. In fact, it seems that the younger generations know less and are more ignorant than the older ones were at their age because there is so much intellectual laziness, both on the students as well as the teachers. We have the entirety of the collective knowledge of the world at our finger tips but very few are interested in accessing it.

Even more, it's not just the information, itself, that is important, but how we interpret and apply it. This is where worldviews come in, and those are not just shaped by pure information, but by philosophy and morality among other things. Science can't answer philosophical questions and they can't answer moral ones, either. It's why it is fallacious to assume that simply gaining more information is going to make people less spiritual/religious, because materialism cannot answer all the questions that people naturally have.

God created us as spiritual and moral beings, which is why we naturally gravitate towards worship and we understand at a foundational level that objective morality exists even if we deny it with our words.

quote:

Yours included.
No, not mine included. God has always existed and made mankind with the capacity and inclination to worship because we were created to worship God. Sin has not removed that capacity nor inclination, but has perverted the object of it so that we seek to worship anything but our creator. We create other gods that are just like us but with super powers. We create idols that are just as sinful and fallen as we are. God is not like that, and we naturally avoid Him because He is wholly other than we are.

quote:

Spirituality doesn't require a deity.
Correct, but spirituality denies the naturalistic materialism that you assume all the world will head towards when we learn more and more information about the natural world.

quote:

Yes it does. Society, knowledge, and belief decide a moral system.
Society can choose whatever moral system they want to adhere to collectively, but they don't establish morality generally, because society doesn't create what already exists. Morality is an intrinsic characteristic and is expressed through societal organization, usually in form of government, but it is also expressed through the individual. I may be expelled from society for having a different moral standard than society has recognized, but society didn't establish morality; it's innate, because it comes foundationally from our creator, who created us in His image with a sense of what is moral built into our design.

But to show the inconsistency of your argument: you must recognize that if objective morality doesn't exist, and that if societies can and do create their own moral frameworks, then the natural conclusion is that no moral system can be objectively "better" than any other. What is, is, and there is nothing better or worse than what is agreed upon by whatever society at whatever time. Therefore, there can be no judgement of other societies and their moral systems in such a worldview. The religious theocracy that burns witches, executes homosexuals, sexually tortures and subjugates women is no better or worse than the society that exalts women, promotes equality in all things, and rejects ignorant superstition. Why? Because there is no single objective standard to compare both of those frameworks to to say one is better than the other.

You, yourself, talk in terms of "better" or "advancement", do you not? Do you not think that it's better for society to throw away religious superstition? To pursue justice, equity, and equality? To promote reason and science above religious belief? Do you not vote and promote your worldview as something to be preferred by others, too? If so, you are in contradiction to your own worldview, and are not living consistently within it. This is the absurdity if your thinking and reasoning when you reject God.

quote:

Incorrect. We're still bound by fear, ignorance, and the lines drawn by society.
I think you confuse what is with what must be. Your worldview makes value and meaning, meaningless. Saying that we have meaning and value in society doesn't address that your worldview doesn't allow that possibility when we act consistently with it.

You should repent of your irrational worldview that rejects your creator and His law for us and turn to Jesus Christ, the son of God, who was sent to obey the law perfectly as a perfect sacrifice on our behalf. Trust in Jesus by faith before your worship of yourself and other men drags you to Hell for eternity. Repent and believe now, while you can.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41682 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:07 am to
quote:

God or Jesus?
Both? Jesus is God. One in substance, equal in power and glory. But, they are two different persons, along with the person of the Holy Spirit.

quote:

because we all know the new testiment was written after Jesus died and the whole thing is someone else recalling this words.....a roman emporer and his schollars no less
Do we know that? If we did, we would be ignorant of history.

I suppose you're referring to Constantine, in particular? If so, did you know that we've got many manuscripts of the New Testament that pre-date even the birth of Constantine? Did you also know that the method of transmission of the Bible was free, not controlled, and therefore there is no possible way for any one person or group of persons to make wholesale changes to the text and pass it off as authentic? If you knew this, then you were being dishonest, but I actually think you didn't know this and were just repeating a common charge against Christianity that is objectively false.

The way the text was transmitted (multiple letters written to multiple churches in multiple geographic regions, copied time and time again for distribution amongst the churches) makes it impossible to control the text. If someone tried to make changes to their copies to pass off something entirely different, there would be other lines of manuscripts that could be used to compare them to to show that they were changed.

But in regards to what the New Testament claims to be (the Word of God): Christians don't place their faith in the accurate portrayals of men, but on the faithful preservation of the truth by the Holy Spirit, which moved those human writers to write precisely what God wanted written, preserving the truth and expressing it in a way that us fallible humans can read it and understand it.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64595 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:10 am to
For leftists to implement their agenda they have to totally transform American society. American society has from the beginning been based upon the family, namely a husband and wife raising children with Judeo-Christian values. The leftist agenda would never be remotely popular enough to gain traction in such a society. Thus, literally every facet of their efforts has been for the past century to (1) expunge Judeo-Christian values from society and (2) destroy the family as the basis of American society.

Abortion is (1) anti-Christian and (2) destroys families. This is why it’s so important to leftists. It’s as simple as that.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61303 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Jesus is God. One in substance, equal in power and glory

Jesus said, "If you loved me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I" John 14:28
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Yes it does.


No, it doesn't. Just because something can be useful, doesn't mean it's always useful.

quote:

Why "should" anyone do anything in your worldview? Where does the "ought" come from when all people are cosmic accidents and there is no greater authority in this universe?


There's no reason for "should" or "ought" to be consistent. It isn't now, and the majority of people on this planet don't believe what you believe.

quote:

Do what you want, then die. It doesn't matter. 


This comes from fear and arrogance. Live your life, be happy, leave a legacy if you choose. Maybe that doesn't matter to you. Maybe the only thing that matters to you is the hope that your life has more meaning because you have a hole that religion fills.

That isn't everyone.

quote:

No, not mine included. 


Yes, yours included. Your god isn't special, or even unique.

quote:

Correct


Indeed.

quote:

Society can choose whatever moral system they want to adhere to collectively, but they don't establish morality generally, because society doesn't create what already exists.


Society does establish morality. Society also modifies morality. This isn't a secret for any student of history.

quote:

Your worldview makes value and meaning, meaningless.


No it doesn't. It just doesn't rely on mythology, fear, and ignorance. I don't need to hope for a better life with someone I hope exists. I already have that.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:21 am to
quote:

What does it require?


If you're doing it right, it doesn't require anything.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11375 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:24 am to
The left hate the concept of personal responsibility - and they love every form of perversion under the son - so that’s how you get abortion.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41682 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Jesus said, "If you loved me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I" John 14:28
Jesus also said:

I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. I and the Father are one. -John 10:28-30

And I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one. -John 17:11

I do not ask for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me. The glory that you have given me I have given to them, that they may be one even as we are one, I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one, so that the world may know that you sent me and loved them even as you loved me. -John 17:20-23

How can Jesus be "one" with the Father if He is not God? How do we reconcile that the Father is greater than the Son while also being one with the Son?

We are told exactly what that means in Philippians 2: Jesus humbled Himself by becoming a servant rather than being one to be served by entering into His creation by taking on human flesh.

So if there is any encouragement in Christ, any comfort from love, any participation in the Spirit, any affection and sympathy, complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. -Phil. 2:1-11

Paul used the humiliation of Jesus Christ as an example of how Christians should humble themselves and serve others, looking out for their interests above their own, just as Jesus did.

So no, Jesus wasn't denying the Trinity in John 14. He was talking about His place in the Trinity while He was a human. He was humbling Himself.
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram