re: Why hasn’t the DOJ investigated the Bidens?

Because they are above the law. MC Hammer said “You can’t touch this”

quote:

---

Do you guys really subscribe to the idea that all of Washington is basically corrupt

---

Yes

quote:

---

Do you guys really subscribe to the idea that all of Washington is basically corrupt a

---

Not all but much of it. There are very few good people in DC politics. That is unless you consider the new wave of socialists good people which may be the case since you are a prog.

Do you disagree?

I would guess because the DOJ can only ask the other involved nation (Ukraine) for the investigation which the President did and we all see what happened.

Your bitchass of a party is impeaching him for wanting Ukraine to investigate and you're asking why he hasn't asked the DOJ to investigate?


What's higher than impeachment? Jail? Death?

I started a thread about this yesterday cause I think the Democrats could have hammered this point home. I believe I know the answers.

According to Rudy G: attempts to get evidence from Ukraine to the Trump admin were being stonewalled by Obama holdovers within the admin.
Trump was having trouble getting evidence to begin an investigation so during the phone call he asked Zelensky to get to the bottom of it.
Timeline wise here is a critical point. The trump team did not start clamouring about Biden corruption. The Democrats brought forth their whistleblower which brought this information to light and began the impeachment process. It would be bad optics to begin a probe while being impeached so they are patiently waiting for this to be wrapped up while also letting it dangle in the public’s eye while the trial carries on.

quote:

---

LSU Fan SLU Grad

---

Have you had any interaction with DC politicos and bureaucrats?

There is a filtering process that takes place in hiring and promotion which measures people by their perceived compliance to certain principles, or should I say, lack of principles.

It happens at conferences, trainings, social events and seminars. The “in-crowd” uses a special DC jargon that measures your ability to subsume logic with adherence to preferred policy.

It’s anti-capitalistic, pro-Democratic, woke, pro-globalist, etc., but it’s really not specifically about supporting a specific platform of policies and beliefs. At this point in time, it’s about an individual’s willingness to parrot the talking points of the in-crowd, which very well may change rather suddenly as befits the in-crowd.

It’s the same thing that has happened to the MSM. Honest journalism is dead and so is honest government, the higher up you go.

Anyone who even asks clarifying questions or proposes alternatives to the narrative, much less take an opposing view, are essentially black balled from promotion to DC leadership positions.

It’s a phenomenon that’s hard to believe, especially if you’re a hard truth type of person. I wouldn’t have believed it if I hadn’t seen it time and again in my previous job.

because there is no evidence to investigate. That's the whole reason trump withheld funds in the first place. In hopes another country could dig up evidence because none existed.

quote:

---

any of you claim that the Bidens are corrupt and the evidence is there. Then why decline to investigate?

---

bc investigating Biden would open up 100's or 1000's of other corrupt people.