Started By
Message

re: Why does Hydroxychloroquine get so much opposition?

Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:00 am to
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:00 am to
They hated it because Trump mentioned it. But, it really hasn't done anything noticeable.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:02 am to
quote:

 (and it seems to be hyped by the same politicians that generally have been most dismissive of the pandemic itself in the places with the most cases, which is an interesting dynamic
Pelosi hyped it as well?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73395 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:02 am to
quote:

But, it really hasn't done anything noticeable.


Yup other than cure patients
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:08 am to
No, it hasn't. We eagerly used it early and often. People on the triple combo ended up sicker or well at the same rates as those who didn't get put on them. The courses were not significantly different. We're not using it now and people are doing well regardless.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34061 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:09 am to
quote:

But, it really hasn't done anything noticeable.


On its own...no. However, when combined with Zinc and a Z pack, it seems to be somewhat effective. I will leave you with this tidbit...I have a good friend that works in the research on a vaccine for COVID 19. While he won’t state that the combo definitively works ( ethically the correct tone at this point), he does have that drug cocktail prescribed, filled, and stored in his medicine cabinet at home. He also told me that that cocktail is option #1. That is enough for me.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87380 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:09 am to
You don’t need 300 million people taking the drug, that is ridiculous, kids, teens, physical ineligibles (those that can’t take it) are eliminated right off the bat. 90million Americans are 23 and under.

The second wave will “start” around September and by early October the MSM screaming about the risks and the election will be at a fever pitch. All we would need is enough people in the 25 to 65 demo that are social, active, and working to take it to slow down the spread rate numbers that would feed the hysteria.

You can also eliminate those that have already had corona and have the antibodies. That is why the story was circulating that you can get it again, to create doubt that they are “safe”

Fortunately it is probably Still way too warm in 2/3 of the country in September/October for a real second “outbreak” to create enough momentum to affect the election but they will try
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:09 am to
quote:

300M people (or so)


Why not use it for those most likely to die.

Does your figure still apply?

ETA: let herd immunity take care of the rest. Life is not without risk.
This post was edited on 5/24/20 at 9:11 am
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9902 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:12 am to
quote:

The side effects of this drug are well known and documented over decades of observations. If the percentage of patients with side effects with this drug are now suddenly deemed to be too much, then shut down every pharmacy because that is a standard than cannot be met by any drug.


Doctors are still able to prescribe a drug in a case such as this, but as the evidence mounts that a treatment is risky but doesn't provide efficacy, the balance of anticipated risks to benefits starts to shift and physicians have different levels of risk tolerance about whether to prescribe it. If the evidence levels get strong enough medical treatments that were once standard of care to prescribe eventually become malpractice. Not saying that is happening with this drug, but the bloom is definitely off the rose, at least for hospital use.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:12 am to
We did the combo. No noticeable difference in outcome.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34061 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:13 am to
IB, does Jake describe yourself experience.

quote:

We eagerly used it early and often. People on the triple combo ended up sicker or well at the same rates as those who didn't get put on them. The courses were not significantly different. We're not using it now and people are doing well regardless.


I’m genuinely curious.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73395 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:14 am to
quote:

No, it hasn't.


Yes it has. Many CA doctors are claiming this but are being silenced

Sorry that bothers you
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59711 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:15 am to
Because a $12 drug has ruined their carefully crafted narrative to suck trillions of dollars out of the US economy in an effort to damage Trump politically.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34061 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:16 am to
quote:

If the evidence levels get strong enough medical treatments that were once standard of care to prescribe eventually become malpractice. Not saying that is happening with this drug, but the bloom is definitely off the rose, at least for hospital use.


Understood. Thank you for your insight.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Yes it has. Many CA doctors are claiming this but are being silenced 

Sorry that bothers you
It doesn't bother me. Like I said, we eagerly used very early in March. There is no "silencing" going on. Doctors can prescribe it if they choose, we did.

I'm not your opposition. I'm a supporter of Trump. I'm simply telling you what I've seen on the ground.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73395 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Doctors can prescribe it if they choose


The Doctors in CA are being grilled like no other when they call in a script. Some are being denied

They claim they have never ever seen anything like it
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:26 am to
quote:


The Doctors in CA are being grilled like no other when they call in a script
That's regressive CA where spitefulness is allowed to dictate policy. Docs should be allowed to practice as they see fit so long as it isn't malpractice.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18597 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Look at the deaths from oxycontin


The opioid crisis in America should be laid right at the feet of Obama care if anyone was honest.

There are a lot of metrics in Obama care around pain and pain management that incentivized doctors to prescribe pain meds for things they did not before O care became law.

Another in the long lines of examples of the government injecting itself into the people’s lives and causing havoc.
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5525 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:35 am to
1. Trump said it works and they HATE everything Trump. (It does work, not for everyone, but for a lot. Also can’t be acquired without orders from a physician)

2. Follow the money. It’s an old and cheap drug that doesn’t bring big profits. Most media sources are owned by conglomerates. Look at the reporting and how the same language is used. Those conglomerates I’m sure are knotted up with “big pharma”.

Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:37 am to
quote:

triple combo


If you refer to the triple combo from The Lancet

Original artical from The Lancet: Triple Therapy

(ribaviron, Interferon b-1b, and Kaletra), I am unable to answer. We just got some I b-1b this last week and have not had a patient to use it on. The data does look promising. 120 patients with 2:1 using all 3 with 50% reduction in time from start to clear nasal swabs. Of note the interferon costs $5700 for 14 vials or $570 per dose, requiring 1-3 doses over alternate days.

The island opens for tourists on June 1 so some data may be forthcoming.
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 9:56 am to
Just realized that you were probably talking about HCQ/AZT/Zn. Yes our small sample size worked. We are talking small sample size. 3 survived, none died. None were on vents.

Of those declining on basis of unproven therapy 2 died out of 2. One may have benefited as he was offered therapy 10 days before vent. The other was only 4 days before vent. These 2 were father and son.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram