- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does Ann Coulter act like this?
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:51 pm to Seldom Seen
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:51 pm to Seldom Seen
Does anyone honestly believe that there wasn't going to be a Russia investigation the level of the one we saw regardless of the Comey firing/Lester Holt interview situation? I certainly hope there aren't people who believe that.
And for those who would say "Well, Trump sure made it easier for them" I say this in response.....that also was going to be said regardless. Regardless of anything and everything. Everything was going to happen the same, regardless.
And for those who would say "Well, Trump sure made it easier for them" I say this in response.....that also was going to be said regardless. Regardless of anything and everything. Everything was going to happen the same, regardless.
This post was edited on 5/24/20 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:52 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
He had no obligation to recuse himself from his job.
He was "substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution".
That's pretty straightforward.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:58 pm to Seldom Seen
Like Mittens, she's struggling to be relevant.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:58 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
He was "substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution".
That's pretty straightforward.
What conduct
There was no criminal conduct on his part or the presidents you dumbass.
Here, why don't you show me the Russian Collusion and ill show you why you are full of shite. He had done nothing wrong and therefore had zero obligation to recuse.
Lorretta Lynch did not recuse herself from the Clinton investigation so you can take your ethical political bullshite and sideline it. That garbage won't fly here.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:03 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
He had done nothing wrong and therefore had zero obligation to recuse.
You don't get to say "hey everybody we didn't do anything illegal so no need to investigate".
Just because Holder did something doesn't make it right.
quote:
There was no criminal conduct on his part or the presidents you dumbass.
Never said there was. There was an ongoing investigation into the President and his administration, which Sessions was a part of. Therefore he couldn't oversee an investigation into himself.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:07 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
Never said there was. There was an ongoing investigation into the President and his administration, which Sessions was a part of. Therefore he couldn't oversee an investigation into himself.
An ongoing unpredicated investigation into the president based on a completly made up dossier. A dossier funded by DNC research.
Jeff Sessions should have done his fricking job and figured out why all this shite was happening when he did nothing wrong. He laid down like a sad puppy because he had no sack for the job.
quote:
You don't get to say "hey everybody we didn't do anything illegal so no need to investigate".
Actually that's exactly what innocent people get to do. You can't illegally spy on a campaign and it's members. The Attorney general should have looked into it by doing his fricking job.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:09 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
Just because Holder did something doesn't make it right.
New Rules - If Loretta Lynch and Holder can break the little made up recusal statutes than certainly Jeff Sessions could have and no one could have done a fricking thing about it without hanging both of those people in the process.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:09 pm to Seldom Seen
Ann ain’t wrong here.
No one forced Trump to do that train wreck of an interview and tell the world he fired Coney because of Russia. It had more to do with Muelker being appointed than a recusal from Sessions.
His own staff told him the interview was a bad idea. He should’ve listened to them.
This interview was the point of no return for the Russia hoax.
No one forced Trump to do that train wreck of an interview and tell the world he fired Coney because of Russia. It had more to do with Muelker being appointed than a recusal from Sessions.
His own staff told him the interview was a bad idea. He should’ve listened to them.
This interview was the point of no return for the Russia hoax.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:12 pm to Sentrius
quote:
This interview was the point of no return for the Russia hoax.
Instead of blaming Trump why don't we actually place the blame on the criminals. That's some garbage arse GOPE apologist nonsense.
These motherfrickers spied on his campaign with Fisa warrants, relentless unmasking of him and his kids among others, sidelined his National Security advisor and accused him of being a Russian Traitor and you still have the audacity to come here and blame him. Trump literally did nothing fricking wrong. The audacity of you people.
He can fire whoever the frick he wants whenever he wants and talk about why for any reason he wants. THERE WAS NO frickING PREDICATE FOR THE SPECIAL COUNCIL. PERIOD. FULL STOP. YOU ARE DEAD frickING WRONG. That interview was always a convenient bullshite excuse but it absolutely played no fricking role in what happened. It was always bullshite.
frick you and frick her. Scumbags.
This post was edited on 5/24/20 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:14 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Ann ain’t wrong here.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:14 pm to Seldom Seen
Sessions didn’t need to recuse. She’s lying, or an idiot.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:15 pm to Sentrius
Sentrius, you aren't of the opinion that the Russia investigation/hoax was going to happen with the same amount of voraciousness with or without the Holt interview? IMO if that weren't used as an excuse it would have been something else, with the quickness.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:16 pm to davyjones
quote:
Sentrius, you aren't of the opinion that the Russia investigation/hoax was going to happen with the same amount of voraciousness with or without the Holt interview?
He's not of sound mind. He's blaming Trump. THink about that for a minute. Trump was setup and illegally attacked without predicate and he's blaming the victim.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:19 pm to Sentrius
They already had the peach mint plan all set up whether he did that interview or not. If Sessions didn't recuse we wouldn't have wasted all that time with Mueller. Or maybe we would have. Maybe Sessions would have not recused, he still would have gone along with whatever Roddy told him to do.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:24 pm to davyjones
quote:
you aren't of the opinion that the Russia investigation/hoax was going to happen with the same amount of voraciousness with or without the Holt interview?
Trump in that interview contradicted his own staff who said the President fired Comey based on the recommendation of Rosenstein and Sessions and said he was always going to fire Comey regardless of the recommendation and said it was because of Russia.
And he just left it at that.
Just that.
quote:
IMO if that weren't used as an excuse it would have been something else, with the quickness.
Well, we’ll never know after that ill advised stunt.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:27 pm to AURaptor
quote:
Sessions didn’t need to recuse. She’s lying, or an idiot.
§ 45.2 Disqualification arising from personal or political relationship.
(a) Unless authorized under paragraph (b) of this section, no employee shall participate in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship with:
(1) Any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution; or
(2) Any person or organization which he knows has a specific and substantial interest that would be directly affected by the outcome of the investigation or prosecution.
Argue that without mentioning the media or Obama.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:30 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
§ 45.2 Disqualification arising from personal or political relationship.
That would literally remove any attorney general that's ever been appointed because it's a political appointment.
quote:
Argue that without mentioning the media or Obama.
Nope, we play by there rules and their standards now bub. New conservatives don't roll over in the mud while the other side breaks every law imaginable.
Posted on 5/24/20 at 8:30 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
They already had the peach mint plan all set up whether he did that interview or not. If Sessions didn't recuse we wouldn't have wasted all that time with Mueller. Or maybe we would have. Maybe Sessions would have not recused, he still would have gone along with whatever Roddy told him to do.
Rosenstein wrote the letter recommending Comey's firing. Trump went on national TV and said that he didn't fire him based on that recommendation but because of the Russia investigation.
What kind of plan do you think Rosenstein had? Is he also playing 3d chess?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News