- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do the Dems think Trump will be indicted for the classified docs found at Mar-a-Lago?
Posted on 8/28/22 at 7:38 am to Dreamville
Posted on 8/28/22 at 7:38 am to Dreamville
quote:
some of y'all need to come to terms with the fact that trump is a dead man walkin. what the DOJ has is air tight, there is no question that trump took top secret documents he had no business with, and then wouldn't give them back when asked for over a year.
Reality Winner got 5 years in jail for taking one page. trump took 700, at least. and he is not the President anymore, he has no security clearance, he has no cover for this, him taking these records is no different than you or I taking them.
hes fricked just for having them, and we havent even gotten into WHY he had them yet, why he would take records that fall under the espionage act, what he did with them, who he showed them too.
I know you people dont like it, but you need to open your eyes and deal with reality so you dont lose your minds when you see him in cuffs.
this is it. this is as far as he goes.
it will help your long term understanding if you downvoters state why you downvoted the clipped in bit above. for a change engage the poster in a spirited consideration.
my bet is still on fanni Willis; Fulton co Georgia district attorney, because she's all in. career on the line.
the feds can use mar a lago as ace in hole. they don't want to be first to indict ex potus.
if another case (hey fani) ends with any jail or prison term then the pressure is off this case and DoJ.
imo the clipped in bit looks like a fair assessment. just having any sci materials outside the sci is a crime.
the misappropriation of any sci materials is 20 years.
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 7:44 am
Posted on 8/28/22 at 7:45 am to shoelessjoe
quote:
They are too stupid to stop listening to the media in hopes of a gotcha moment.
100pct this. I have some relatives that watch evening news like a sicko watches porn, just getting more and more excited.
And the news doesnt' even report anything!!! Just regurgitates more bullcrap. "Tnight at 11, we got em now!! Donald Trump facing the music for stealing alleged nuclear secrets, then a report by Lester Holt about what stolen nuclear secrets can do in the hands of a man with alleged bank debts to alleged russians, then a report by Jack Mehoff about what the evil russians are doing to the poor syrians"
And the circle jerk keeps going... You keep drinking this beer, you gonna get drunk on power.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 7:55 am to Dreamville
quote:
some of y'all need to come to terms with the fact that trump is a dead man walkin.
I can't wait...
quote:
the DOJ has is air tight
Heard before but wasn't...
quote:
there is no question that trump took top secret documents he had no business with,
Actually those documents were declassified.
How do I know?
Because the final arbiter of what is classified and what is not already started those documents were declassified.
So you mean he had documents that anyone was free to have and look at.
quote:
then wouldn't give them back when asked for over a year.
The people asking for their return was the government. The national archives was the part of the government that wanted them.
As you no doubt would think there are often things the national archives wants that former Presidents thinks are personal and not public do there must a mechanism.
Why yes, there is. The national archives can take civil and not criminal complaint against the former president.
And then there can be legal proceedings and the final arbiter of what is personal and what is public can make the decision.
And you likely already know who this is. The former president.
quote:
Reality Winner got 5 years in jail for taking one page. trump took 700, at least. and he is not the President anymore, he has no security clearance, he has no cover for this, him taking these records is no different than you or I taking them.
I agree with you. And nothing would happen to us because those records were no longer classified.
quote:
hes fricked just for having them
How is he fricked by having them?
Anyone can have those documents and look at them.
They were no longer classified.
quote:
why he would take records that fall under the espionage act, what he did with them, who he showed them too.
Doesn't matter.
You understand he could have declassified the launch codes for nuclear misled and given them to putin and that would be legal.
He could declassify nuclear secrets and let the Chinese see them and that would be legal. Clinton did that.
This is why the former president can't be guilty of that act, because he decides what is classified or not.
quote:
know you people dont like it, but you need to open your eyes and deal with reality so you dont lose your minds when you see him in cuffs.
Well the law says otherwise.
quote:
this is it. this is as far as he goes.
Good, why do you hate him so much that you are just delusional.
You likely understand the legal reasons I outlined above that everything you state is wrong.
If you didn't that makes you ignorant. And that is somewhat allowable. Only thing is you have seen these r reasons elsewhere on the board and yet you still choose to ignore them.
That makes you willingly ignorant. That is kinda inexcusable.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 7:58 am to CelticDog
quote:
my bet is still on fanni Willis; Fulton co Georgia district attorney, because she's all in. career on the line.
Still haven’t read the transcript have you? I don’t understand why you won’t educate yourself and continue to post propaganda.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:09 am to Dreamville
quote:
Sections 1519
quote:
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
They have to prove basically that he was obstructing something.
Since he didn't think anything here was a crime, he cannot be guilty of it.
Plus those documents were not part of an active investigation. That is going to be tough to show.
And section 2701 states...
quote:
(a)
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
The former president kinda gets to decide these things.
That is why every former president has taken truckloads of documents without issue in the past.
So no.
quote:
section 793 is the Espionage Act, which makes no reference to whether a document is or ever was classified. "Instead, it makes it a crime to retain, without authorization, documents related to the national defense that could be used to harm the United States or aid a foreign adversary."
Yep. Except had authorization. Yep.
That is why the president can't be found guilty of this.
quote:
there is no question trump broke all three of these laws,
Except he didn't.
quote:
the simple fact that he returned some top secret docs is proof that he had them. and he wasnt framed, it wasnt the deep state, it wasnt demons, for some unknown reason he just wanted these files, and so he stole them.
Except that they weren't to secret.
He returned some documents to the national archive which he didn't have to return.
They weren't top secret. They weren't stolen. They were his records and not public records so they were his to take. He took them because he considered them his records, which he is free to decide.
Everything you said is wrong.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:22 am to thetempleowl
quote:
And nothing would happen to us because those records were no longer classified.
no one person can reclassify sci materials.
you have been misinformed.
not even a president.
some 3 guy committee convenes. they look into the means the intelligence was derived. on and on.
weeks even months.
no one person can declassify sci materials.
some docs even require two levels of committees.
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 8:25 am
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:23 am to hikingfan
Because they always think they have him this time.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:29 am to thetempleowl
quote:
He took them because he considered them his records, which he is free to decide.
the crux
he can consider them his until doomsday but they belong to the USA.
this will be decided in court.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:36 am to thetempleowl
quote:wow. I mean. There is dumb, and then theres dumb, and then theres this.
Doesn't matter.
You understand he could have declassified the launch codes for nuclear misled and given them to putin and that would be legal.
This is why the former president can't be guilty of that act, because he decides what is classified or not.
I cant believe I even have to say this, but no, the President is not allowed to give our launch codes to our enemies.
what on earth are you talking about?
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:36 am to Dreamville
quote:
some of y'all need to come to terms with the fact that trump is a dead man walkin.
Dreamville……….name checks out.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:37 am to CelticDog
quote:Actually yes he can.
no one person can reclassify sci materials. you have been misinformed. not even a president.
There is quite literally no information available to the government a President cannot declassify if they choose.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:40 am to CelticDog
quote:
no one person can reclassify sci materials. you have been misinformed. not even a president.
Liar. You are 100 percent wrong in this. It is settled law.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:49 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Liar. You are 100 percent wrong in this. It is settled law.
liar. roe was settled law, until it wasn't
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:50 am to llfshoals
quote:what is wrong with you people, who is telling you this nonsense.
There is quite literally no information available to the government a President cannot declassify if they choose.
the identities of spies.
there.
thats one.
President cant reveal their names. its above his pay grade.
info about how to build a nuclear bomb or enrich nuclear material, thats another, he cant declassify that,
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:51 am to hikingfan
Because, at the end of the day, they think if they can jail Trump, then they can start jailing anyone that voted for him.
Simple as that.
Simple as that.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:57 am to hikingfan
The Dems are stupid dupes for the most part. Watch Germany freeze their asses off this Winter because of the same Muh Climate Change policy that they have just imposed. We're next. Education forthcoming.
Muh Orange Man Bad.
Muh Orange Man Bad.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:09 am to Dreamville
quote:
there is no evidence that anything he took was ever declassified
Your say-so is all you've got here.
I keep hearing 'no one is above the law' - from Comey, Strzok, Pelosi, Hildawg, and other *cough* upstanding pillars of our government *cough*
quote:
there is no question trump broke all three of these laws
Wrong.
However, I suspect some of the above listed *cough* upstanding pillars of our government *cough* have broken those laws you cited.
quote:
you seriously need to get it through your head
Be sure and tune in to fake news for the latest episode of "we got Trump this time and we'll tell you why."
This is another frame job and you're in for another rude awakening.
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:13 am to Dreamville
quote:
what is wrong with you people, who is telling you this nonsense.
Second time I’ve asked you to cite the law that supports your assertions regarding a Presidents power to declassify.
Popular
Back to top


3




