- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are "they" so obsessed with mentions of 'FLAT EARTH'? Just a silly "CT", right?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:27 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:27 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
He also believes the sun is small and 3000miles away, and that there's a firmament over the earth.
He also believes so called star forts are portals to alien worlds.
Ah, so a crazy person.
quote:
And that it was impossible to transport bricks in the 19th Century.

Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:27 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
????
Am I hearing you correctly that since I can see a pen top at 2 inches I should be able to see a celestial body from thousands of miles??
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:28 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
How do you mathematically explain sight limits on a ball?
It isn't curvature.
Wait, there's 2 of you???
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:29 pm to BugAC
He also believes the Earth is 7000 years old.
That Antarctica is an Ice Wall surrounding the Earth Game of Thrones style, and that "they" won't let us see it.
That Antarctica is an Ice Wall surrounding the Earth Game of Thrones style, and that "they" won't let us see it.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:31 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
You are painfully stupid.
Set me straight then genius.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:32 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
He also believes the Earth is 7000 years old.
That Antarctica is an Ice Wall surrounding the Earth Game of Thrones style, and that "they" won't let us see it.
He's like the crazy bar owner on Shaun of the dead who said Dogs can't look up.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:33 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Gideon Swashbuckler
Listen, i'm relatively new to these flat earth "strangeties" that's being spewed here. So explain to me, one of your hypothesis that is constantly challenged.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:34 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'm asking you a question. Stop being a bitch and answer it to the best of your ability
I will readily admit that my opinions are based on my personal observations.
Please explain to me how it is possible to stand on Falmouth Beach and see the beach on Nantucket which is approx 40 miles away? With an amateur telescope. It should definitely behind the curve, no?
Or am I so painfully stupid that even an intellectual superpower such as yourself cannot explain it to me so I can understand?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:34 pm to BugAC
He's extremely crazy, for real I think.
The rest of the flat earthers are likely just trolling.
A few of the biblical literalists are likely real.
The rest of the flat earthers are likely just trolling.
A few of the biblical literalists are likely real.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:34 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Am I hearing you correctly that since I can see a pen top at 2 inches I should be able to see a celestial body from thousands of miles??
I’m taking it you cannot answer. Cmon.
Polaris is the same brightness in Ontario Canada as Mexico City. With alllll the dust. With all the moisture. With all the atmospheric disruption.
But it’s dust and moisture that keeps the southernmost part of a South American country.. that is over two times smaller than Texas. From seeing it.
Same brightness from Ontario to Mexico City. Dust, moisture, atmosphere. Same.
Can see from northern Equator. Can’t see in south.
Lay it out for me. Layman’s terms. Pull out your charts… your books… take celestial readings tonight. Don’t care.
Hit me with an explanation.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:37 pm to BugAC
quote:
Wait, there's 2 of you???
There are videos of ships seemingly disappearing over the horizon only to be brought back into focus with a telescope on the beach.
Now, if the ship is truly disappearing beyond the curvature, how then can they be brought back into focus by a telescope?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:39 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
It is a fluid, however.
So? Now respond to these please.
quote:
Of all the ignorant views in this thread, this one cracks me up the most. What is the source of light? Why does this light go through phases?
And concerning lack of visibility in our atmosphere, if the sun is only a few thousand miles above a flat earth, why is it visible to some and not others? Even with microscopes. Or telescopes that can see non visible light? You do know visible light is a small portion of the entire spectrum?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:40 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Pull out your charts… your books… take celestial readings tonight. Don’t care.
Hit me with an explanation.
So I have to prove with charts my opinions, but you can just say that Polaris is the same brightness from any vantage point on Earth without proving it??
I already said that that I doubt any change in brightness would too subtle to quantify.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:41 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Set me straight then genius.
Answer any of my previous questions. You are directly stating that there is a physical limitation on human sight on a flat disk through the obstructive effects of atmospheric refraction. We know that the index of refraction for air at STP is 1.0003, while in a vacuum it is 1.0000. From that, I am asking what is the distance at which humans cannot see a distant object, because refraction isn't nearly as obstructive enough to make a distant object invisible to the human eye. Thus, what is causing the physical limitation of human eyesight on a flat disk?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:41 pm to Liberator
quote:
The EARTH ITSELF is Level. The topography is what a surveyor deals with. Apples, Oranges.
Nonsense. You are utterly clueless, man.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:41 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Now, if the ship is truly disappearing beyond the curvature, how then can they be brought back into focus by a telescope?
Because magnification exists.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:43 pm to crazy4lsu
Can't be at all if the ship is more than six miles away.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:47 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
So I have to prove with charts my opinions, but you can just say that Polaris is the same brightness from any vantage point on Earth without proving it?? I already said that that I doubt any change in brightness would too subtle to quantify.
Read what you are saying. You said this. Any change in brightness would be too subtle to quantify.
For tens of thousands of miles. A change in brightness is too subtle to quantify. From the far North America to Central America. No easily seen change.
But. But… atmospheric phenomena keeps the southern tip of Ecuador from seeing it. When the northern tip can. In a country 2.5 x smaller than Texas.
Same thing in Kenya. Columbia. The Maldives. Same.
You have been just so on point so far to start answering questions with questions.
I can explain it. But you don’t believe it.
Now explain it to me.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 1:48 pm to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Please explain to me how it is possible to stand on Falmouth Beach and see the beach on Nantucket which is approx 40 miles away? With an amateur telescope. It should definitely behind the curve, no?
What? You are using magnification, which is the ratio of the image height to object height, and the interactions of multiple lenses, including your own eye, to increase the total magnification of the object.
Popular
Back to top


1



