Why are foreigners allowed to run our media networks and newspapers?

Because we live in a free society?

Well we had a foreigner as president so I guess why not?

quote:

---

holy shite you are melting about this

---

That's a melt?

quote:

---

That's a melt?

---

starting like 4 threads within 3 minutes of each other on the same topic? yes absolutely

quote:

---

if you see something, say something

---

As if the FBI would actually follow up on it.

I don't know buddy. You tell me.

[quote

born 11 March 1931) is an Australian-born American media mogul

His father, Sir Keith Murdoch, had been a reporter, editor, and senior executive of the Herald and Weekly Times newspaper publishing company, covering all Australian states except New South Wales.[5] After his father's death in 1952, Murdoch declined to join his late father's registered public company and created his own private company, News Limited. Murdoch thus had full control as Chairman and CEO of global media holding company News Corporation, now the world's second-largest media conglomerate, and its successors, News Corp and 21st Century Fox, after the conglomerate split on 28 June 2013.[6][7][8][9]

In the 1950s and 1960s, Murdoch acquired a number of newspapers in Australia and New Zealand, before expanding into the United Kingdom in 1969, taking over the News of the World, followed closely by The Sun. Murdoch moved to New York City in 1974, to expand into the U.S. market; however, he retained interests in Australia and Britain. In 1981, Murdoch bought The Times, his first British broadsheet, and became a naturalized U.S. citizen (and as a result, gave up Australian citizenship) in 1985 to satisfy the legal requirement for U.S. television ownership.[10][/quote]

Dreamers

quote:

---

starting like 4 threads within 3 minutes of each other on the same topic? yes absolutely

---

Its called a victory melt. I'll allow it.

quote:

---

Why is this mexican allowed to own a media outlet?

---

Right on, Adolph.