Started By
Message

re: Who is the US killing in its boat attacks? Hegseth won't say, and lawmakers want answers.

Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:03 am to
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
9116 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I don't give a shite what Pete and Trump do to them.


That's the point. They're using OUR military to do it. It's not "Pete and Trump" who are executing suspected criminals.
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20637 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Vicki Weaver
Vicki Weaver nor her "gun criminal" husband was attacking our shores with tons of drugs.

Apples to apples fool.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85454 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

executing suspected criminals
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148555 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:53 am to
I think we still working to get the back log list of victims from the deadly strikes in Yemen, Somalia, etc. from a decade ago.


Let’s start there and work forward Bunk
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
41569 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I get it, I just think the payback is going to be terrible at some point when a Dem gets back in power.


We saw what the payback looked like the last four years. You guys keep saying this but the alternative is to do nothing. Trump may be pushing the boundaries in some respects but until they get punched back hard they will keep pushing the boundaries. Raw power is the only thing they understand. I am far less concerned about potential blowback than I am with the consequences of doing nothing and not moving aggressively while we have the advantage

Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Posted by Bamanjo
Member since Sep 2025
219 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Whoever they want! Frick’em!


Good lord
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35176 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:42 am to
I would suggest that you mistook something with a facetious tone for outrage.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24153 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Wow, I hope this is sarcasm. That's my point in all of this. All anyone needs to do to make this "lawful" is label a group terrorists in an executive order.


And when democrats do it, because they are terrible in every way, it will be unjust.

Again, try a little harder. You're not keeping up.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24153 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:45 am to
quote:

executing suspected criminals.


Defending against paramilitary narco terrorists.
Posted by Bamanjo
Member since Sep 2025
219 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:46 am to
I’m disappointed that there are people who think DJT should be allowed to kill whoever he wants outside of US borders
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2145 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:52 am to
quote:

I’m disappointed that there are people who think DJT should be allowed to kill whoever he wants outside of US borders


Do you think democrats (who locked arms with the “Maryland man”) would vote to allow DJT to stop drug boats?

Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
11306 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:54 am to
quote:

We're in a war with South American civilians?


The ones trafficking drugs into our country, yes.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85454 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:54 am to
quote:

I’m disappointed that there are people who think DJT should be allowed to kill whoever he wants outside of US borders

Like an American and his teenage son?
Posted by Bamanjo
Member since Sep 2025
219 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Do you think democrats (who locked arms with the “Maryland man”) would vote to allow DJT to stop drug boats?


I’d settle for just seeing the evidence the White House used to come to the conclusion that they should kill these people. I’m reasonable and can be convinced.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2145 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:57 am to
quote:

I’d settle for just seeing the evidence the White House used to come to the conclusion that they should kill these people. I’m reasonable and can be convinced.


I didn’t ask what you’d settle for. I asked if you think democrats would vote for it.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27624 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Whoever they want!

This is actually the correct answer. They are just getting off on indiscriminate killing. Otherwise they would have some actual evidence other than a grainy video of a boat.
Posted by Bamanjo
Member since Sep 2025
219 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

I didn’t ask what you’d settle for. I asked if you think democrats would vote for it.


Not trying to be a dick, but what’s your point?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35176 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:13 pm to
Bro if that were true people like you would be handily disposed of, if for nothing else for the general annoyance that comes with your “Orange man wrong and bad in every single situation ever.” So on top of everything you’re wrong about (along with your little buddies), you’re also wrong about this sky scream regarding indiscriminate killing.

You’re describing scenario wherein Trump just wakes up in a bad mood sometimes and wants to do some indiscriminate killing. Frickin random honest and hardworking Venezuelan fishermen……instead of indiscriminately killing those dregs of society here amongst us.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 12:15 pm
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2145 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Not trying to be a dick, but what’s your point?


Democrats would have voted against Trump…because OMB/TDS.

So we’d just end up here through the channels already taken, or the boats would keep headed this way.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35120 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

This is actually the correct answer. They are just getting off on indiscriminate killing. Otherwise they would have some actual evidence other than a grainy video of a boat.


The last thing you people want is Americans believing they are allowed to defend themselves.

Literally, the last thing.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram