- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is the US killing in its boat attacks? Hegseth won't say, and lawmakers want answers.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:31 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:31 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Dem gets in office.
Dems would invite these fricks into the country with the quickness.
0
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:37 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
The repatriated survivors raised a new legal question: if the U.S. had enough evidence to attack their boat, why wasn't that evidence sufficient to try them in an American court?
Well the answer here is that the administration does not want these people in our country in detention as they will become the next heroes for the democrats. Leftist judges will want them released from imprisonment for a host of constitutional reasons. So, send them back to where they came from.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 6:42 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:38 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
We're in a war with South American civilians?
Not all of them, silly... just the ones running drugs.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:38 am to offshoretrash
quote:
They are killing drug runners.
I support this 100%.
What I do not support at all, if true, is sending survivors back to their home countries to try again.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:38 am to Bunk Moreland
Hey Bunk, maybe you should give em a call and ask for this evidence.....
Maybe they'll give you a tour of the classified, top secret station where drone operators and computer analysts work and monitor satellite feeds, drone footage, intercepted phone calls and every other communication imaginable!
This is dumb. Of course they won't reveal how they know and they shouldn't.
Maybe they'll give you a tour of the classified, top secret station where drone operators and computer analysts work and monitor satellite feeds, drone footage, intercepted phone calls and every other communication imaginable!
This is dumb. Of course they won't reveal how they know and they shouldn't.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:38 am to Rip Torn
quote:
Tilapia fishermen
Who use submarines.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:39 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Well the answer here is that the administration does not want these people in our country in detention as they will become the next heroes for the democrats. Leftist judges will want them released from imprisonment for a host of constitutional reasons. So, went them back to where they came from.
How about first letting them bake on Guantanamo for a few months?
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:40 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
Using a leftist talking point word for word. Good lord you’ve lost it.
Yeah but he's a staunch conservative...that scours MSN for his news.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:43 am to lake chuck fan
I generally hate state secrets and using muh national security to protect the government from any scrutiny.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:43 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I think there is healthy discussion to be had about whether operations like this should have oversight.
Oversight from the likes of the staunch defenders of Maryland Man? From the league of lawyers and judges working overtime to free illegal traffickers of every thing from drugs to guns to people? Fighting every detention? Every deportation?
No, thank you.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:45 am to Rattlehead82
I have an old AOL email I still use and stories like this always pop up first. It actually provides a nice snapshot of what the MSM drones are saying.
and stories like this always pop up first. It actually provides a nice snapshot of what the MSM drones are saying.Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:47 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
We're in a war with South American civilians?
You make drug mules sound innocent. Is that your take?
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:49 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I generally hate state secrets and using muh national security to protect the government from any scrutiny.
Think of all the state secrets via muh national security that happened under other administrations that you DIDN'T hear about because MSM carries water for Black Jesus and Autopen?
Or, even some that did get reported but... "at this point, what difference does it make?"
Never-mind, you probably "can't recall".
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:52 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Bunk Moreland
approaching scrubber kook level
Het that post count up!
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:53 am to SallysHuman
I just think zero accountability from the security state and MIC leads to things like Russiagate or Iran Contra. This is different because Pete is open about the attacks, but again, blowing up civilian boats off another continent (that probably weren't even coming here and going to drop off drugs in another country) is pushing all kinds of boundaries and blurring all kinds of lines.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 6:55 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:54 am to Rattlehead82
quote:
Yeah but he's a staunch conservative..
Prohibition was a progressive ideal, not conservative.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:54 am to dalefla
They get captured constantly.Better to sink them where caught, avoid US Courts and half assed Journalists from USA Yesterday.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:56 am to offshoretrash
quote:
They are killing drug runners.
Bunk's TDS is so obsessively insane that he doesn't care about the purpose of the operation(s).
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 6:58 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:56 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
RogerTheShrubber
Now the thread is complete!
Posted on 11/2/25 at 6:56 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
The repatriated survivors raised a new legal question: if the U.S. had enough evidence to attack their boat, why wasn't that evidence sufficient to try them in an American court?
I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure I could come up with a pretty solid explanation for this one.
What is your logical estimation for why they might not be brought to America?
Page 2 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News