- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which Republican Congressmen won their seat promising voters MOAR continuing resolutions?
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:34 am to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:34 am to Bjorn Cyborg
It’s such an inane self-fulfilling merry go round of logic.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:37 am to LSUbest
quote:
Cut the spending.
Secure the border.
You know where.
The question is how you get the DEMs to go along with this via budget.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:37 am to therick711
quote:
No one can do that. They can just point to your post where you said that Mccarthy had 95% of his caucus and at least that of the caucuses constituents. The conclusion logically follows from that statement. Don't blame others for your lack of precision.
Funny innit? He wants the board posters to let him in on the house plan twenty moves down the line, yet when they put one and one together and deduce a simple implication, he denies he ever mean that. The synapses aren’t all connected.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:39 am to Padme
His point also is that because it would be hard to fight for their priorities, Kevin Mccarthy was justified in laying down.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:39 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Maybe not in that extremely specific verbiage, but you and I had the following exchange:
Constituents want moderates and stability.
The DEMs would gladly pass a budget that the GOP would never accept.
So the choice, for now, is CRs or shut down. The population supports CRs over shut downs, if that's what you're asking.
I'm sure they'd support a budget, too, but none of us posting on here want the DEMs to pass their budget.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:40 am to Padme
quote:
Not trying is a losing proposition
Wrong.
The DEMs aren't trying and won yesterday.
Doing nothing is a good strategy when your enemy is imploding.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Tldr version of this. Republicans can't win so they have to lose without a fight. No one should believe any part of that logical chain. It's foolishness.
This post was edited on 10/4/23 at 8:41 am
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:41 am to therick711
quote:
His point also is that because it would be hard to fight for their priorities
The DEMs own the process.
The inherent flaw in this talking point is the assumption that the GOP can do these things, currently. Note: they cannot.
Again, the DEMs control the Senate and Presidency. How do you get this legislation passed?
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never thought Gaetz would sell out to the DEMs
So now your argument has to be either Gaetz filed this motion with no intention to vote in favor of it and only changed his mind once he saw how the other side was voting, or he gave something so substantial to the other side it secured their entire voting block.
Which is it?
If it’s the first, then you’re even more stupid than we all already know you are.
If it’s the second, please name what this substantial thing someone as politically limited, according to you, can promise to secure 200+ votes.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:42 am to therick711
quote:
Republicans can't win so they have to lose without a fight.
Republicans can win, eventually, if they learn how to fight with a good strategy.
Not this chest-beating emotional stuff from yesterday. Hence muh fight.
Republicans today have to make up for the strategy failures of the past, namely investing in the wrong institutions (like churches and suburbs).
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Negotiate and block deliver, sure they own that process. That was not always the process. If you cared about trying to accomplish something, that's not the process you use. You're jumping into the problem at the brink as did Mccarthy. He had 9 months to take another path, but those cocktail parties were too much to pass up.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The population supports CRs over shut downs, if that's what you're asking.
You don’t know that. And the OP’s point was that every single republican campaigns on changing Washington. Yet one of two words in CR stands for continuous
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm asking for the MAGA strategy.
Pass a functional budget and let the Dems shut down the government.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:44 am to therick711
quote:
You're jumping into the problem at the brink as did Mccarthy. He had 9 months to take another path, but those cocktail parties were too much to pass up.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not this chest-beating emotional stuff from yesterday. Hence muh fight.
Back to the "emotional" trope you love. Yet, just yesterday when I said Mccarthy should have carefully weighed poking his adversary in the eye, there you were with your suggestion that Mccarthy make him "nut up or shut up". You don't have a single leg to stand on with your internet bullshite.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not this chest-beating emotional stuff from yesterday. Hence muh fight.
You think because you throw "emotional" at every argument you can't rebuke is effective? (It isn't)
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:45 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Gaetz filed this motion with no intention to vote in favor of it and only changed his mind once he saw how the other side was voting,
I think this is exactly it. He thought the DEMs would offer concessions to KM but when they signaled they wouldn't, he filed.
On the flip side, everyone thought KM would work a deal out with the DEMs, but they pulled that rug (I guess the last CR was enough for them. Smart, b/c the next shutdown threatens the holiday season so they will have all the leverage).
He clearly didn't have GOP support (he lost most of his support from January) and was never filing if he'd lose.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:46 am to therick711
quote:
Negotiate
that's called "selling out to the Democrats" on here
quote:
He had 9 months to take another path,
I'm asking for alternative examples.
Have been for about an hour. No serious alternative options have been presented, I don't believe (in 3 different threads)
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:47 am to therick711
quote:
Yet, just yesterday when I said Mccarthy should have carefully weighed poking his adversary in the eye, there you were with your suggestion that Mccarthy make him "nut up or shut up".
KM thought he had DEM support.
He was wrong. Gaetz pushed through the DEMs wishes.
I didn't think Gaetz would sell out to the DEMs, and I was wrong. I have admitted that many times.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:47 am to SlowFlowPro
I reject playing your game. I don't answer questions with premises that are fundamentally flawed. I instead focus on demonstrating that your line of thinking is flawed at every level of analysis.
Popular
Back to top



0




