Started By
Message

re: Which European nations are you willing to send American soldiers to die for?

Posted on 7/9/18 at 7:31 am to
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
11087 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 7:31 am to
quote:

This question is absolutely irrelevant and irks me to no end. John McCain served his country and would gladly send thousands of Americans to their deaths to make his political donors rich. And as for NATO, conservative Constitutionalists opposed its creation because they feared the collective defense provision usurped Congress's ability to declare war. They were right. The only question we should ask before going to war is if the physical security of the United States and its citizens are in imminent danger.

So, “I didn’t serve” is the short answer. You know, you could have, they accept volunteers.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 7:44 pm
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10680 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 7:33 am to
I would like to think that you Trumpkins would want to defend all European countries. Despite the immigration you despise they remain majority white by far. Even France. When you look at all the beautiful women in Europe from Spain to Finland I thought you''d want to defend all those white women.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 7:33 am to
quote:

So, “I didn’t serve” is the short answer. You know, you could have, they except volunteers.
You seem to be of the opinion that only those that were in the military are allowed to have an opinion on foreign policy matters. Or that not serving somehow makes one's opinion invalid?
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24694 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 7:34 am to
Sweden... because have you seen their women?
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63667 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

.because of everything they did to help us defeat the Nazis etc.


I get your point about that comment, although I didn't hear it. I will say, though, that the Europeans, even the French, fought and suffered their share of casualties.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63667 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 2:08 pm to
Members of NATO, because of the formal alliance.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134904 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 2:12 pm to
Poland, the Baltics, Austria, Hungary, Italy
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Since it’s so vital we strap ourselves to Europe and protecting them, where is the line where we’re willing to join a war?

To protect France? Germany? Estonia? Portugal?


Any of them that have joined NATO.

Now, had you asked "are you willing to leave NATO?" you would hae got a more interesting answer.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134904 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

You know, you could have, they except volunteers.

Did they not teach you how to spell in the Coast Guard Reserves?
Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
5857 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 2:53 pm to
It's not who to protect, but rather who is the attacker.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
11087 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Did they not teach you how to spell in the Coast Guard Reserves?

No, Emory. But they do allow edits. But nice to see you denigrate all service members in the Coast Guard Reserve. Congrats talker! I take it you know nothing about the Coast Guard, I doubt I could have got in.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram