Started By
Message

re: When will the double tax on stock dividends and gains be removed such a pox.

Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:22 am to
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16085 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

I just don't think the term "double tax" is accurate.


It’s dead on accurate.

Tax 1) corporate income is taxed.

Tax 2) corporate income is spread to the shareholders as dividends. Where it is taxed a second time as personal income.
Posted by Turbotoes
Clown world
Member since Dec 2020
266 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:22 am to
Barb,

They print money and debase the currency and since it takes more dollars to buy the same amount of goods, they call that a capital gain and then tax you on it. It's criminal.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13032 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:25 am to
Are you earning money? Yes? Then STFU and pay your damn taxes. You are not paying taxes on the money you put in. You are paying it on the earnings it returned to you.

Some of you are just ridiculous.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16085 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Are you earning money? Yes? Then STFU and pay your damn taxes. You are not paying taxes on the money you put in. You are paying it on the earnings it returned to you.


Good gosh. The taxes are already technically paid.

Shareholders are owners of the company. The company’s income is their income. They expended the capital to buy the shares therefore securing their ownership interest.

The income is then taxed on the 1120. Exxxcept they get another tax on the 1040.

How would you like it if your wages were taxed at the employer, and the bank taxed them again? Essentially the same thing.
Posted by MidWestGuy
Illinois
Member since Nov 2018
1794 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:44 am to
quote:

It’s dead on accurate.

Tax 1) corporate income is taxed.

Tax 2) corporate income is spread to the shareholders as dividends. Where it is taxed a second time as personal income.

The above has it right. Some of the other examples are not correct.

From Investopedia:
quote:

Double taxation refers to income tax being paid twice on the same source of income. This can occur when income is taxed at both the corporate and personal level, as in the case of stock dividends.


That is different from capital gains tax. Sure, you generally purchase the stock with funds that were already taxed, but you are only taxed on the *gains*, not the funds used to purchase the investment (that is your un-taxed 'cost basis').
This post was edited on 5/5/25 at 9:45 am
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
1820 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Are you earning money? Yes? Then STFU and pay your damn taxes. You are not paying taxes on the money you put in. You are paying it on the earnings it returned to you.



But it’s a progressive money grab that Congress uses to gain personal wealth for themselves, friends, and family.

As a retired person, why am I having to sweat out my investments fluctuations and pay more than others because I took chances /opportunities, built, saved/invested to get to this point?

You seem to be a guy who thinks it’s ok to tax some people more than others, a “pay their fair share” kinda person.

I paid an obscene amount to the government for 2024, most of which would have been better off with me putting it to use in the economy and charities.

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56068 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Also estate tax sunsets this year and will go down to @ $6 million from @ $14 million.


Wouldn’t hold my breath on this. I despise the estate tax.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5768 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Why does one who risks investment pay taxes on gains from monies already paid tax on?


Because that's life. Who says you paid taxes on the money that you invested?

We pay tax on income in this country, sir.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16085 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 10:31 am to
quote:

We pay tax on income in this country, sir.


Twice?
Posted by OrangeCurtainTiger
Member since Oct 2009
609 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 10:34 am to
Really? The dude is talking about dolls.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51707 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 10:35 am to
Capital Gains is a very complex issue. Because we don’t index for inflation the capital gains tax yields bizarre results, which is probably the purpose; it allows savvy businessmen to manipulate ordinary income into capital gains to reap the low tax rate.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51707 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Taxes on L/T capital gains, in most instances, are taxed at 15%

21% federal.

The double tax is that the income from the shares is taxed as income, then if the shares are sold the gain is taxed at 21%. It’s really not double taxation, which is commonly used to describe the phenomenon in which corporate income tax is paid by a corporation and then the dividends are taxed at the shareholder level.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56068 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

21% federal.


Wrong. The LTCG rate is 15% up to $583,000 of income. Then it goes to 20%. There is a 3.8% Obamacare tax on top of that.

21% is the corporate tax rate. That is very different.
Posted by MidWestGuy
Illinois
Member since Nov 2018
1794 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Capital Gains is a very complex issue. Because we don’t index for inflation the capital gains tax yields bizarre results, ...

Yes, few people get the 'bizarre' nature. Many (usually liberals) will claim that long term cap gains get 'beneficial' treatment. Well, sometimes yes, often no. They are generally taxed at 15%, instead of your marginal tax rate, so often-times lower. But... as you point out, inflation comes into play:

If I bought a stock 20 years ago, and it doubled, I pay 15% tax on the gains (so 7.5% on the amount I sold). And if I bought a stock 1 year ago, and it doubled, I pay the same 15% tax on the same gains. But... my 20 year old stock isn't really a gain, it didn't even keep up with inflation. So 'beneficial' treatment depends on circumstances. It is bizarre.

quote:

yields bizarre results, which is probably the purpose; it allows savvy businessmen to manipulate ordinary income into capital gains to reap the low tax rate.
Can you give an example of how this is done. Stock options?

quote:

double taxation, which is commonly used to describe the phenomenon in which corporate income tax is paid by a corporation and then the dividends are taxed at the shareholder level.
Right, the double taxation comes from the corp paying taxes, and then the investor paying taxes.So the gov taxed it twice.
This post was edited on 5/5/25 at 11:36 am
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22612 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 11:40 am to
Assuming the income tax exists, I don’t necessarily have a problem with tax on interest, dividends and gains. If it didn’t exist it would be fairly easy to hide actual income and be counterproductive.

I do have issues with how they may affect the rest of your tax return, as they can indirectly increase your overall income tax bill by phasing you out of credits and deductions, creating penalties and also increase your marginal rate. There is commingling there that unilaterally benefits the government.

Taxes are boxed into a calendar year which gives individuals very little flexibility. Capital gain events can sometimes be out of your control. Establishing and tracking cost basis may be very impractical for an individual. Navigating the tax system can be complex and may require the use of a professional which isn’t deductible. You may have an isolated event that triggers lots of different tax mechanisms you never had to know about before.

All that being said, I think things should be simplified at the individual level. Especially people that do not have the means to game the tax system. People that make most of their money on W2 and pay taxes through withholdings shouldn’t be treated the same as people with 200 page returns every year. It’s a broad discussion, but I have seen the burden that a surprise $5-10k tax bill puts on people first hand.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51707 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Can you give an example of how this is done. Stock options?

I’m not very savvy financially, but stock options is certainly one way. And in a partnership we’ve used Profits Interests as a way to compensate W-2 employees in a way that will be taxed at lower rates. I’ve been in meetings with Private Equity guys who know every trick. They’ll discuss some way of shielding and my head is spinning.

I started a company, with partners, and we ran it for over two decades and finally sold. The liquid assets were taxed as ordinary income but the goodwill was taxed as capital gains. And the large majority was goodwill. It was great paying 21% instead of 39% income tax, and in Louisiana you don’t pay diddly if you are headquartered in state for more than five years. I felt like I was robbing Fort Knox.

Why is the sale of a business, developed without any material capital investment, taxed as capital gains? I’m glad we were able to take advantage of that, but it’s a scam. It seems that the way it should work is that the original capital investment should be indexed to inflation and subtracted from the sale price to get the taxable amount. The same should be done for any other capital investments. Then the net sale price should be subject to ordinary income tax. Maybe allow a ten year income averaging.

We got a great payday and paid a combined average tax of about 23%, while the average doctor, making a half million per year is paying 45% inclusive of state taxes. I’m glad I was on that side of it, but does that seem fair?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56068 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I started a company, with partners, and we ran it for over two decades and finally sold. The liquid assets were taxed as ordinary income but the goodwill was taxed as capital gains. And the large majority was goodwill. It was great paying 21% instead of 39% income tax, and in Louisiana you don’t pay diddly if you are headquartered in state for more than five years. I felt like I was robbing Fort Knox.


Something is wonky here. The ordinary income you should have in a liquidation event is depreciation recapture. The rest should be LTCG taxed at 15-20 percent. 21 percent is the corporate tax rate. No individual has a 21 percent LTCG rate.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51707 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

The LTCG rate is 15% up to $583,000 of income. Then it goes to 20%. There is a 3.8% Obamacare tax on top of that.

We were a partnership, and I don’t know how this happened, but we got a break on the 3.8% Obamacare tax and our marginal was right at 21%. Actually I do know how it happened…it was an 11th hour backroom lobbying deal the night before the Affordable Care Act passed that partially exempted certain businesses. Another reason it is a scam - a good scam, defined as one that benefits me.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56068 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 3:04 pm to
Fair enough.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170433 posts
Posted on 5/5/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:


The gist of the topic is that revenue gained from taxed income should not be taxed again period. It’s government theft.

But why are you singling out cap gains tax? People pay sales tax, excise taxes, property taxes on income that is already taxed.

Are you suggesting that income tax should be the only form of taxation?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram