Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:35 am to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

it's a distinction without a difference, unless you can explain otherwise.


non-viable = unable to survive regardless of medical intervention. Not capable of human life.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25753 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

she discovers a medical problem after conception that would bring a risk to her, etc.


This is covered under the Alabama bill..
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Consent is a part of autonomy. If you consent to something, you maintain your autonomy because you chose to allow it to happen.
Indeed. Would also imply responsibility and consequences for ending the life of another. You’ve boomed yourself.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45448 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Including end her pregnancy.
You left off the rest of my statement: "so long as her actions with her body do not result in the deaths of others."

It's like that old saying, you can swing your fist around all you want as long as you don't hit someone else. In this case, the abortion is hitting someone else.

quote:

The state cannot force you to forgo bodily autonomy to keep another human alive.
Yes it can. There are already punitive laws and regulations around drinking while pregnant because it can harm the child.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Father doesn’t consent to the baby being born. His autonomy


That's not what bodily autonomy is, little buddy.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26097 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

non-viable = unable to survive regardless of medical intervention.


Well, let's go ahead and kill the terminally ill.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Fetus, not baby.
You are THAT gullible. All you have do is change a word and now you are a-ok with killing human babies
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37667 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

the partner lies about protection, or she's abused, or the contraception fails (as they can do),


“You gotta condom on right?”

“Yeah”

“Okay, I believe you. Just gonna close my eyes now and not look and see. Or, hell, ya know, feel the difference between flesh and a rubber”
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41187 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Unless she's raped, or the partner lies about protection, or she's abused, or the contraception fails (as they can do), or she discovers a medical problem after conception that would bring a risk to her, etc.


And not one bill put forth by Dems limits abortion to these scenarios
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:37 am to
And just like that, we're at the part where we try to use the exception to prove the rule. This is a particularly dishonest strategy used by leftists, because they have absolutely NO intention of conceding that the remaining 98% of abortions are acts of pure evil. It's a transparent appeal to emotion, nothing more.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

There is no absolute right to bodily autonomy.


There is.

quote:

You can't smuggle contraband into a prison by jamming it up your a-hole.


You can choose to jam it up there, and the state can choose to remove it. You still got to choose to 'slip and fall' on it.

quote:

Preventing the killing of a life is justifiable intrusion


It's not.

Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
83375 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Its rights don't supersede those of the pregnant woman.

Why not?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
69213 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:37 am to
when that "autonomy" was the right to murder an innocent life
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37667 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

That's not what bodily autonomy is, little buddy.


Where did I say bodily autonomy, stupid shite?

I said FINANCIAL autonomy. And autonomy over his life for the next 18 years.

Reading is hard, eh?
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Nobody's arguing we should kill babies after birth.


Except Obama who as a State Senator advocated letting babies that survived abortions die of neglect....

Except the NY Legislature.....

Except the Gov. of Virginia....

Except the thousands of Democrats who refuse to advocate any number of "Born Alive Protection" acts...
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:39 am to
quote:

non-viable = unable to survive regardless of medical intervention. Not capable of human life.




So again, am I allowed to walk into an ICU and start killing people who are on life support?
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:39 am to
quote:

you guys








I'm not trying to bar anything
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:39 am to
quote:


Abstinence
Condoms
Birth Control Pills
Norplant
Vasectomies
Hysterectomies


Which of these is being "barred"?


All of them? I said try to bar, you guys aren't as successful as you'd like at preventing evil contraceptives from being available


When did lawmakers try to ban condoms and whatnot?
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21088 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

All of them? I said try to bar, you guys aren't as successful as you'd like at preventing evil contraceptives from being available to lustful Americans!
Once again, give us proof.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
Here's a description from medical-dictionary.com. I've left the term fetus unchanged. It does not make it any less monstrous, depraved, and barbaric. But then, I'm not dumb enough to be fooled by a simple term
quote:

IDX first involves administration of medications to cause the cervix to dilate. Dilation usually occurs over the course of several days. Next, the physician rotates the fetus to a footling breech position. The body of the fetus is then drawn out of the uterus feet first, until only the head remains inside the uterus. The physician then uses an instrument to puncture the base of the skull, which collapses the fetal head. Typically, the contents of the fetal head are then partially suctioned out, which results in the death of the fetus and reduces the size of the fetal head enough to allow it to pass through the cervix. The dead but otherwise intact fetus is then removed from the woman's body.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram