Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:16 am to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74728 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:16 am to
quote:


Are they 100% effective?


Thank you for proving my subtext point. You want 100% guarantees of freedom from consequences, when it will never exist unless you go the abstinence route. Women must be more conscientious of these because the way that human biology is, they're the ones that get stuck with the consequences.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Yeah, because that'll help solve the issue!
Look I know Leftists are complete sluts who can't help but frick all the time, but most people have bodily autonomy
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124820 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:16 am to
A fetus is three fifths of a person. Everybody knows Pat.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Why are you keeping it to the lowest minimum?


Because those are the laws you and your dumbass party are passing at present. Pay attention.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:17 am to
quote:

You’re arguing for infanticide


No, abortion.

You're arguing for a complete removal of the right to bodily autonomy for pregnant women - why?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:17 am to
So, when medical technology advances to the point we can incubate a human baby even at six weeks, you'll become pro life?
Posted by PanhandleTigah
Florida Freedom Zone
Member since May 2008
9452 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Its rights don't supersede those of the pregnant woman
So they’re equal right?? The mother had a choice in most instances. The child does not get a choice in its life or subsequent death by being ripped apart or stabbed to death.

How is that not barbaric??
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25753 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

No, abortion. You're arguing for a complete removal of the right to bodily autonomy for pregnant women - why?


That right never existed. You can’t sell your kidney...
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

On what legal and moral basis can a fetus be denied the same rights as any other human?


It requires another human's agreeing to give up bodily autonomy in order to continue living.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Abstinence works 100% of the time.


Good luck building real policy on something that won't happen.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74728 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

A fetus is three fifths of a person. Everybody knows Pat.


You fricker. You beat me to it. Slaves had it better than unborn children when it comes to the way that the Democrats view them. At least a slave was 60% of a person. Babies don't get nearly that much acknowledgement from the Dems.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:19 am to
Answer the question.

quote:

Can the state force you to provide labor and wages earned with one’s autonomous body to pay for a kidney to transplant to an individual who is dying, provided you'll both live?


You first.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25753 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

It requires another human's agreeing to give up bodily autonomy in order to continue living.


That’s true of any child...can’t just leave them in the woods.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464907 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

You're arguing for a complete removal of the right to bodily autonomy for pregnant women - why?

they understand genetics

while you change the moral and scientific definitions on the fly to suit your political views

your dishonest ilk make me feel bad saying i'm pro choice
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Because those are the laws you and your dumbass party are passing at present. Pay attention.
Lol, this dumbarse actually said this?? Try opening your eyes and ears. You will be amazed at all the dumbassery that goes away when you do.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41182 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Condoms have a horrid success rate


99% is a horrid success rate.

And republicans only want birth control removed from government mandates healthcare plans that people are forced to buy, not private ones
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45447 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

It is what we're talking about - the state has no more right to demand you give up a part of your body to save another life than it does to demand a woman carry a fetus to term if she chooses not to.
That's not what even remotely equivalent, so no, it's not what we're talking about.

A mother doesn't have to "give up" anything in order to carry a child. The natural state is to carry the child. If she doesn't actively do anything to endanger the child, it will likely be brought to term and be born. Again, no one is "forcing" a woman to do anything. What the laws against abortion are attempting to do is to prevent a woman from taking action against another human being to end its life. That's not the same thing at all as refusing to give your liver to someone who needs it. It would be more equivalent to shooting the person who needs the liver in the head.

quote:

Tell the next pregnant woman you see that she's not doing anything for the child while it's gestating, and let us know how that goes.
She's not actively doing anything and I'll gladly say that. I'm a father to multiple children after all. I know what goes on during pregnancy.

quote:

Except carry a child to term regardless of her wishes.
Not even that, no. That's the natural state and will happen naturally unless something else interferes with it. It'd be like telling someone they have to breathe. That doesn't even make sense because they breathe naturally unless they die.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

we are the party of compassion and rightful spheres of influence for government and charity.




I want some of what you're smoking.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464907 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

It requires another human's agreeing to give up bodily autonomy in order to continue living.

this isn't a legal standard

and you do realize this standard applies past birth, right?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Good luck building real policy on something that won't happen.
It used to happen when abortion wasn't an option. You give people a fail safe they will engage in riskier behavior. Take it away and they'll avoid
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram