- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
When Barack told Dimitry Medvedev he could be "more flexible" after...
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:44 pm
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:44 pm
the elections, there was no outcry from the Dims or MSM as to what he meant by that. What concessions was he willing to make after being re-elected? Was Russia willing to do what they could to help him get re-elected in order to get these concessions?
11
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:48 pm to tigerjoey
He was willing to give them our uranium for massive kick backs
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:48 pm to tigerjoey
Shhhhhh the narrative bruh
You are messing up the narrative
You are messing up the narrative
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:57 pm to tigerjoey
quote:
What concessions was he willing to make after being re-elected?
He was willing to let them meddle in the elections while looking the other way.
The MSM never blames nobama for any meddling which possibly occurred by multiple countries.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:59 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
He was willing to let them meddle in the elections while looking the other way.
Proof?
Posted on 7/20/18 at 12:04 am to olddawg26
Without adding anything to what he might have meant, your response is both simply contrarian and obtuse.
I implore you to expound upon what he could have legitimately been referring to as a response instead.
I implore you to expound upon what he could have legitimately been referring to as a response instead.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 12:08 am to indianswim
Asking for proof is neither contrarian nor obtuse. It may seem that way because you know as well as everyone it was simply his opinion. If requesting evidence is against logic now then we have a more serious issue. Is that what’s going on?
Well that was easy. Bye.
Well that was easy. Bye.
This post was edited on 7/20/18 at 12:25 am
Posted on 7/20/18 at 5:41 am to tigerjoey
Has any reporter ever asked him what he meant when he said that? Has he ever been held accountable for making that statement?
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:06 am to olddawg26
quote:
quote:
He was willing to let them meddle in the elections while looking the other way.
Proof?
It happened?
which is demonstrably true
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:07 am to tigerjoey
quote:
there was no outcry
Bc he's their savior
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:11 am to indianswim
quote:
Without adding anything to what he might have meant, your response is both simply contrarian and obtuse. I implore you to expound upon what he could have legitimately been referring to as a response instead.
I'd like to kick you in the balls.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:14 am to tigerjoey
quote:
there was no outcry from the Dims or MSM
Russia wasn't the boogey man, yet, back then.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:16 am to tigerjoey
Dude. Everybody knows that if you start your Presidency by saying you're going to be the most transparent administration in history, then nobody can accuse you of corruption.
I meant to say, he was invoking the "Black While President" clause of the Constitution. It's written on the back side.
I meant to say, he was invoking the "Black While President" clause of the Constitution. It's written on the back side.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:16 am to John Casey
quote:
Russia wasn't the boogey man, yet, back then.
Correct; we had plenty of other fake enemies
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:21 am to olddawg26
quote:
quote:
He was willing to let them meddle in the elections while looking the other way.
Proof?
The 2016 quotes he made telling them to "cut it out", the stand down order reported by F'BI and NSA agents, all the stuff that actually occurred and nothing was done about till Trump took office...
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:32 am to olddawg26
In the summer of 2016 Obama’s cyber security chief was told to stand down instead of developing counter measures against the Russian interference. Proof
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:33 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
He was willing to give them our uranium for massive kick backs
This.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:35 am to olddawg26
quote:
He was willing to let them meddle in the elections while looking the other way.
Proof?
Barak H Obama "I looked Putin right in the eye and told him to cut it out"
also BHO "Mr Trump, there is no evidence that a single vote has or will be rigged, stop whining and get people to vote for you..."
crickets....
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:40 am to cajuncarguy
quote:
I'd like to kick you in the balls.
ahhhhhhh - the intelligentsia has arrived.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:45 am to olddawg26
quote:
Proof?
Proof
This is proof of one or more of the following: 1) incompetence 2) collusion 3) complacency 4) intentional disregard. Based on your current concerns, this should trouble you greatly. After all, it’s more proof of possible collusion with Russia than has been found on Trump.
But let me guess... we are about to hear an excuse if you do not decide to ignore altogether.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News