- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What should be Americans' response to the real terrorists?
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:46 pm to REG861
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:46 pm to REG861
quote:Obviously that wasn't necessary, was it.
One would think such dastardly villains would have had the foresight to plant Iraqi terrorists (or at least a single one) on the 9/11 so as to secure their case for invading Iraq
1
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:48 pm to TX Tiger
quote:Again, vague axioms regarding the human condition, with absolutely nothing concrete.
Are you saying that man doesn't seek dominance and control and in the case of the OP wouldn't use whatever resource he has to achieve it?
"People want control, therefore there's a massive conspiracy." You've got to connect those dots somewhere, make some kind of connection, anything.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:49 pm to WhoDatGreenBeret
quote:I find it histerical that some people don't believe that the two huge towers falling down could cause critical damage to a nearby building.
Bldg 7?
Instead they believe that the people who brought down the twin towers didn't think that was big enough, so they brought down building 7 "for effect".
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:20 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
quote:
One would think such dastardly villains would have had the foresight to plant Iraqi terrorists (or at least a single one) on the 9/11 so as to secure their case for invading Iraq
Obviously that wasn't necessary, was it.
Well they only had to pander to the UN for months, losing valuable time and oil profits, plus lose the respect of large swaths of the world community, and worst of all, have their plot uncovered by experts such as yourself! One would think such an omnipotent shadow government would have sought to avoid being unmasked by an amateur sleuth such as yourself.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:21 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
nstead they believe that the people who brought down the twin towers didn't think that was big enough, so they brought down building 7 "for effect".
Exactly. Another titanic logical fallacy in their crude arguments.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:19 pm to genro
quote:
"People want control, therefore there's a massive conspiracy."
Who said anything about a conspiracy? Powerful people make business plans and then those business plans are carried out to the best of abilities.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:23 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
FRENCH JOURNALIST: ...Don't you think that by trying to eradicate terrorism in Chechnya you are going to eradicate the civilian population of Chechnya?
VLADIMIR PUTIN: If you want to become an Islamic fundamentalist and be circumcised, come to Moscow. We are multiconfessional. We have very good specialists. I can recommend one for the operation. He'll make sure nothing grows back.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:24 pm to mmcgrath
quote:I agree. The government is hysterical. The official story says WTC7 fell by fire and NOT by critical damage to it from falling buildings.
Bldg 7?
I find it histerical that some people don't believe that the two huge towers falling down could cause critical damage to a nearby building.
A lot of what the government is telling us about 9/11 is indeed hysterical.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:36 pm to REG861
quote:Try again. Iraq was invaded because it threatened the Petro Dollar and failed to conform to the international banking cabal.
One would think such dastardly villains would have had the foresight to plant Iraqi terrorists (or at least a single one) on the 9/11 so as to secure their case for invading Iraq
Obviously that wasn't necessary, was it.
Well they only had to pander to the UN for months, losing valuable time and oil profits.
It's about money....It's ALWAYS about money.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:46 pm to TX Tiger
So another journalist gets beheaded and you are still spewing your shite?
You're a fricking psycho. And you're stupid.
You're a fricking psycho. And you're stupid.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:43 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
That is the question, isn't it.
I don't need more questions but answers.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:53 pm to TX Tiger
quote:Right. In this case, Osama bin Laden and his followers and cohorts in his particular variety of radical Islamism, collectively known as al-Qaeda, made a plot and carried it out against the United States and its people. To suggest that is untrue, and was instead a frame job and the real perpetrators were an elite anonymous cabal of the wealthiest and most powerful in the world, would absolutely require a massive conspiracy. Who said something about a conspiracy? You did, in your OP, you fricking mentally retarded person
Who said anything about a conspiracy? Powerful people make business plans and then those business plans are carried out to the best of abilities.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:51 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
What should be America's response to the real terrorists?
Sure, we'll answer this question when you tell us who the real terrorists are. Are they the global fascist elite you keep telling us bout?
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:33 pm to Revelator
quote:Truther.
That is the question, isn't it.
I don't need more questions but answers.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:51 pm to genro
quote:Interesting how you legitimize your conspiracy theory with the benign "plot."
Who said anything about a conspiracy? Powerful people make business plans and then those business plans are carried out to the best of abilities.
Right. In this case, Osama bin Laden and his followers and cohorts in his particular variety of radical Islamism, collectively known as al-Qaeda, made a plot and carried it out against the United States and its people.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:55 pm to TX Tiger
I've already stated that 9/11 as perpetrated by bin Laden, was a conspiracy, by definition. You are suggesting an alternative, outlandish conspiracy rooted in conspiracy theory, a paranoid pseudo-science. Are you really trying to get some "gotcha" moment on the basis of simple semantics, the word "conspiracy" itself? Jesus Christ you are grasping at straws.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:48 pm to genro
quote:
Are you really trying to get some "gotcha" moment on the basis of simple semantics, the word "conspiracy" itself? Jesus Christ you are grasping at straws.
Isn't that exactly what you're doing? quote:Wrong. It's conspiracy theory, by definition. Anyone who believes they know what happpened on 9/11 is a conspiracy theory whackjob.
I've already stated that 9/11 as perpetrated by bin Laden, was a conspiracy, by definition.
quote:I am suggesting that there are very rich and powerful people on this earth who would kill their own grandmother if they saw enough of a profit in it.
You are suggesting an alternative, outlandish conspiracy rooted in conspiracy theory, a paranoid pseudo-science.
That's not conspiracy theory. That's fact.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:01 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Try again. Iraq was invaded because it threatened the Petro Dollar and failed to conform to the international banking cabal.
Once again you evade the obvious point that the 'cabal' was too stupid to plant Iraqis on the 9/11 planes.
little coward
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:02 pm to REG861
quote:
What should be America's response to the real terrorists?
Obama should call Cameron and Merkel and ask how close they are to catching Jihadi John. That's really about it. He can maybe bust on Cameron a bit for America advancing to group stage of the World Cup while England bowed out pathetically.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 11:04 pm
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News