Started By
Message

re: What is the income range for "middle class" per the board?

Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:51 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23146 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:51 pm to
$400k would put you in the top 1%.

It's amazing how stupid some poli board posters are.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21695 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Does demand for high-end gaming computer consoles mirror income bars?


If the consumers were across the income spectrum, yes. But I doubt there are many high end gamers across the poverty spectrum.

Obviously theres a cutoff point where someones income isnt sufficient to purchase a home. That point going backwards, yes demand would be negligible. That point going forward should loosely resemble home buying power, and loosely demand. As you said not all $100,000 millenials even want a home at the moment.

But that could be viewed a couple of different ways. Possibly the currently supply doesnt meet the demand. Possibly they have too much student loan debt to afford a home, or perhaps daycare is too much to get out of an apartment.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135592 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

50 year high by 2016. Get out...

Now you are comparing an apples-to-oranges TimesPicayune article about the New Orleans market, with National Information???
Really?

Are you missing this?

US Homes are larger, better, and indisputably far cheaper by a 40yr comparison when lending rates are considered. Those are simple, easily discernible facts.

Perhaps my homes, or your house, or those of your family are anecdotal exceptions. Perhaps. (You never know until you sell) Regardless, unless you're just trying to put your own claimed real estate holdings on display, you are making points you don't think you're making.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

For most people...
if you make less than me... you’re “poor”
If you make more than me... you’re “rich”
If you make about what I make... you're “middle class”

There’s nothing better than people making $120k/yr that tell you the top 10% are “rich” but they are “middle class”


This is why politicans always talk about helping the middle class.

Someone making 30k a year thinks they are middle class

Someone making 200k a year thinks they are middle class
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
42968 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:50 pm to
Nobody has mention North Dallas in their housing spat and the fact that they can't build homes fast enough.

Not to mention these homes in the SUBURBS are 300k+ .

You would have to move to Prosper to find anything decent. Guess what? Prosper is next on the blow it out your arse list cities to go to the moon.

Prosper is damn near 60 minutes in normal driving conditions from Las Colinas (my work).

I simply just need to marry some decent looking brawd who makes the same cheese as me and just do the whole life thing. God that sounds awful in my head
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53783 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

You still have to pay payroll taxes (FICA, Medicare & Medicaid) on your 401(k) contributions.




True, you can't avoid all the taxes, but you're not paying federal, state and local earnings tax. Between me and the wife that's a decent amount of money.

Before I maxed out the 401k our taxable income for federal/state/local combined was 25k less than our total compensation. We should be able to hit 30-40k in 401k money in 2018. My goal is to pay very little tax or break even, the past several years I've had to pay and that was still deducting mortgage interest and claiming my daughter, both of those deductions are gone in 2017.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:09 pm to
quote:


If the consumers were across the income spectrum, yes. But I doubt there are many high end gamers across the poverty spectrum
well that and the fact that 50 year old executives probably don't want high end gaming consoles at the same rate that 25 year old entry-level professionals do
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94776 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

$400k would put you in the top 1%.


Doesn't mean you're not middle class - I said that was the upper edge of upper middle class and I also said a lot of these lines are arbitrary. If you're living in Harrisonburg, Louisiana, and you pull $400k, you're one of the richest people for miles around. If you live in Falls Church, Virginia, you're average/above average. So, that's relative too.

I bet you think $200k is "rich" too.

Financial Samurai shows how $200k isn't all that much money in the grand scheme of things.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135592 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 5:40 am to
quote:

Financial Samurai shows how $200k isn't all that much money in the grand scheme of things.
On a one year basis, it isn't.
If you save 1/4th of it, it seems even less . . . until after 30 years of doing that, you have a $5-$6 million dollar investment account.

In terms of lifestyle, is there a whole lot of apparent difference between living off of $150K vs $200K? Maybe, maybe not. But the difference between $5 million and $0 is palpable.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 6:09 am to
quote:

There’s nothing better than people making $120k/yr that tell you the top 10% are “rich” but they are “middle class



I'm in this range and I still consider myself poor.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
30469 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 6:14 am to
Middle class earnings doesn't always translate into middle class life.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 6:17 am to
Talking percentiles or median in this discussion makes no sense to me.

The word "middle" is the problem here.

We have 3 terms. Two of them are descriptive of lifestyle. "Poor and Rich". The other is descriptive of a location and that fricks everyone up
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94776 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 6:59 am to
quote:

In terms of lifestyle, is there a whole lot of apparent difference between living off of $150K vs $200K?


No - but my argument is that from about $50k to $60k of household income up to ~$400k - day to day, even year to year, isn't that much. Now - like I said, the $400k family is living in a larger, nicer house. They're driving nicer cars and cycling those cars more frequently. They're taking longer, nicer vacations. They're taking more frequent vacations.

But, "middle class" for me has never meant the 3 middle income quintiles. It's the 99% of us that have to work for a living or otherwise rely on the government for subsistence.

That $400k doctor has to shut his practice because of a billing problem, or a negligence suit or whatever? They're hurting. Maybe not Day 1 or Month 1, but those folks live paycheck to paycheck just like everybody else. My definition of wealthy is - mom and dad don't have to get up and go t work if they don't want to. Rich people are often gainfully employed, but that's more of a tradition than a necessity.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 7:03 am to
We outright own our 3 acres with no mortgage. We don't have a ton of debt. We're really doing ok. I still can't shake that feeling that we're struggling. We really aren't.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
29320 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 7:22 am to
Local cost of living should be factored in with their salaries.

Doesn't matter if you make 80-100K, but live in CA or NY where everything is so high, vs making 50K and living in an area where everything is much cheaper.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94776 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 7:27 am to
quote:

living in an area where everything is much cheaper.


Meh. It's America. Cars, televisions, furniture, computers, cable, internet, etc., all that shite costs the same whether you live in Monterey, California, or Huntington, West Virginia.

Really - real estate and, to a certain degree, groceries are the only significant, "can't avoid" expenses that vary from region to region within the U.S.

Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 7:43 am to
It is relative to where you live and all that stuff. My wife and I earn around $190k combined but I don't feel at all like we are upper middle class. I feel we are average.

Funny how perspective changes though depending on where you are. When I am on the coast anywhere for vacation, I feel poor when driving by all the beach front homes and boats in marinas, etc.. But on the 5 hour drive home going through rural areas and small towns, I see tiny homes with shite all up in the yard and rusted up cars on blocks. It is then that my perspective is reset to reality. That is that there are a lot more people in the nation that are lower middle class than upper middle class.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135592 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Maybe not Day 1 or Month 1, but those folks live paycheck to paycheck just like everybody else.
If someone making $400K/yr is living paycheck to paycheck, that doesn't make them middle class. It makes them stupid.

It's on them.
I guess that's my point.

Taking it to the extreme, even after making millions, a large percentage of professional athletes live paycheck-to-paycheck. They then border on bankruptcy a few years into retirement.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 8:05 am to
quote:

It is relative to where you live and all that stuff. My wife and I earn around $190k combined but I don't feel at all like we are upper middle class. I feel we are average
well obviously you're not average but again this is why we need far more than three terms or even extra terms like upper middle and lower middle.

The person making 100k is nowhere near as well-off as the person making 400k but the person making 400k is ridiculously poorer then the person making a million a year. And the guy making a million is a Pauper next to a CEO making 5 million a year. And the guy making 5 million still doesn't even know where the parties are that Bill Gates attends. And it will be a long time before he will.

The term middle class is entirely a political term
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 8:07 am to
quote:

making 100k


Is the bottom rung of Middle Class income
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram