What is the goal of the NYT spy story??

It is a strange circumstance that they did go 180 degrees after the past two years.

Rush said this story came out because they are trying to get ahead of the Horowitz report and they are getting scared.

quote:

---

Also, I believe libs will play it as political revenge and try to cry foul or just say they believed their “sources” and given the gravity of the claims, what they did was justified ei. Play the hero.

---

The issue is, if that is their play, they will need to justify continuing the investigation after they determined it to be false, which I don’t think they can do.

Maybe they know what’s coming and want to be able to say they were one of the first outlets to start running the stories. That, or the reporter is getting fired for wandering off the reservation.

get out in front of what is coming out; and say they thought the Russians infiltrated so they were black jesus heroes acting on national security purposes.

As people have mentioned here, they’re getting ahead of it to sugarcoat what’s going to be reported.

My summary of the NYT’s article was their admitting of the Trump campaign being spied on with an informant being implanted into the campaign circle.

The way they’re sugarcoating it is by saying that it was for the country’s protection against the Russians and they didn’t tell the campaign, because they didn’t want to “damage” his election efforts.

We’ve come a long way from Trump being called a liar for saying Obama tapped his wires in March of 2017.

Motive?

Normalize otherwise completely traitorous, totalitarian and otherwise dishonest activities of the Obama Administration, and the Democrat Party in General.

They’re gonna ease into an admission that Obama spied on private citizens for no other reason but that he wanted to maintain control of the masses, so they can say he did it because he cared and for a good reason, to save us from ourselves and Muh Russia.

Like any abuser, they will tell us it was for our own good.

frick Obama. And frick the New York Times.

First of all lets set the stage:

The NYTs is a mouthpiece for the FBI as WaPo is a mouthpiece for the CIA as CNN is a mouthpiece for the State Department and ODNI. This is not a strict relationship but in general this is the relationship. These media outlets publish favorable media content in exchange for access. That is the quid pro quo.

So...

quote:

---

What is the goal of the NYT spy story??

---

I posted his yesterday and I believe it's still true:

quote:

---

You see what NYTs is doing, right?

Oh, but the FBI used spies and entrapment methods with good intentions because of the RUSSIANS!

---

Okay, lets put this into perspective.

The initial Carter Page FISA warrant was obtained on July 31, 2016. So any spying conducted after July 31st the FBI will claim that is was done legally.

There is a problem though; the Carter Page FISA warrant was obtained illegally by lying to the FISC court (omitting exculpatory evidence and not following the Woods procedure). Acquiring the FISA warrant would have been the right thing to do to spy legally on team Trump but FBI illegally acquired the FISA warrant.

But the question still remains even if they were spying legally, why did the FBI not notify the Trump campaign that he Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign? But I think we all know the answer. The FBI was not really interested in the Russians they were just interested in framing Trump. And an easy way to infiltrate the Trump team is to compromise inexperienced team Trump members (like George Papadapoulous) especially on foreign soil were U.S. 4th amendment and civil rights laws do not fully apply.

So when the IG report comes out, they can say this is old news and the American people are ready to move on.

quote:

---

Crossfire Hurricane "officially" started on July 31, 2016

The initial FISA warrant was obtained/signed on October 21, 2016

---

Oops