- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the basis/benefit for all of these advertisers having interracial couples
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:39 am to Liberator
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:39 am to Liberator
quote:
Atta boy! Nice reading comprehension.
clearly I'm not on your cognitive level, so maybe explain it so I can understand better what you are referring to.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:44 am to Liberator
quote:
I get the whole "Devil's Advocate" role -- but surely you can weigh in with your own position on corporate advertisers and their MO for shopping "muh-Diversitah" ahead of product placement and promotion.
I generally favor letting the market worry about that for me.
Personally, I don't give a shite what's in a commercial. I rarely watch them, and view them as an obstacle to watching a game and a waste of my time.
My primary interest here is determining why this bothers some of you so much, and what exactly you think should be done about it.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:57 am to RoosterCogburn585
It's been the attitude out of Madison Avenue for decades: less about advertising best practices to sell a product than it is the social statement promoting and wishing how this country looks eventually - Brazil.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:59 am to Liberator
quote:
Pretty tricky. Are you a Millennial?
I was born in the early 80s. By some definitions, I'm the oldest of the Millennials. Some consider me a young Gen X. I don't particularly care.
Anyway, how do we work this out so you're happy with the racial distribution in the commercials you see when you're watching your stories?
quote:
Stop. You're triggering me.
That isn't the goal, but I'm never sad to hear that I have another fan.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:00 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Personally, I don't give a shite what's in a commercial...
Even if the message was to demonize, divide, cheat, steal, subvert, control, or blind your fellow neighbor?
Do you understand how advertising and propaganda works?
quote:
My primary interest here is determining why this bothers some of you so much, and what exactly you think should be done about it.
You've read the commentary on this thread, right?
What's your conclusion?
a) Unfounded Paranoia. Now who's winning the game?
b) Triggered, insecure White People
c) Nothing to see here
d) OTHER "This thread tells me___________________________"
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:02 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I was born in the early 80s. By some definitions, I'm the oldest of the Millennials. Some consider me a young Gen X. I don't particularly care.
Ok, that helps. Thanks.
quote:
Anyway, how do we work this out so you're happy with the racial distribution in the commercials you see when you're watching your stories?
I've posted an Exit Poll Thread Questionnaire (see above)
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:11 pm to Liberator
quote:
Even if the message was to demonize, divide, cheat, steal, subvert, control, or blind your fellow neighbor?
Do you understand how advertising and propaganda works?
Sounds like you don't watch commercials during election season.
quote:
You've read the commentary on this thread, right?
Yes and, so far, none of you have sufficiently addressed many of the questions posed.
quote:
What's your conclusion?
I don't think you can bucket everyone into one group. Some certainly fall into each. Still others are just looking for something to be pissed off about.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:13 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Pushing the agenda, at all cost
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:17 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
You tell me what national percentage of IR couples in advertising we definitely zomg perish-the-thought should NOT being going over, and then we'll launch a crusade to establish YOUR quota.
We shouldn't be worrying about what the numbers are.
Progressives want higher and higher numbers.
Conservatives are getting called out for noticing what the progressives are doing.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:18 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Attracts more than one demographic if you buy the theory that people are more likely to buy a product from someone who "looks like me" (and research has shown it to be - to an extent - true)
That reasoning is complete bullshite.
If you wanted to "attract people that look like me"...
Then the largest margin would be whites of German backgrounds and Hispanic with Mexican backgrounds.
You ain't advertising to 6% if you even go by your logic. This is a sociology experiment in real time, not targeted advertising.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:19 pm to Liberator
quote:
I'm also in tune with The Plot -- more so than you since I'm not immersed in a Rookie-Bubble of a reality OR Millennial who's been jack-hammered his/her entire life by agenda-driven social re-engineering.
Yawn. If that were true of me, I'd be a rampant leftist who hates Trump, not a black millennial who DOESN'T view "white supremacy" as some bogeyman
quote:
One HUGE metric.
Nah. I already laid out how you're trying to compare apples to oranges. You wanna stand over there in your wrongness and be wrong? Your prerogative. I'm not gonna stop you
quote:
There is ZERO problem with IR couples on Tee-Bee.
Then calm your shrill arse down, mijo.
quote:
The problem is the focus, frequency, and messaging beyond
Lol. Mixed couples. The horror.
quote:
a portrayal agenda to marginalize and ridicule the White Straight Male demo.
Lmao. One of my younger sisters is a bi, left of center black woman.
She's married to a white dude whom she holds in high regard, not ridicule. Try again, Libby.
quote:
HUH??
Ok, kudos for passing English III.
Did I stutter? Which of these words below threw you for a loop, bruv? This is how I talk, and it's not difficult to keep up with it, either:
quote:
Due to simple biology, a cap on their total population (and, thus, influence, once their relatively nascent public niche in society is well and truly normalized).
None of what you underlined is difficult to comprehend.
quote:
It has been "advertising" a LIFESTYLE.
Heh. If you knew the more nuanced meaning of that term, you'd clutch your pearls even harder
quote:
both are promoted to a disproportionate degree
Blah blah blah muh proportions. You just said you had no problem with quotas, but you clearly WANT a cap on IR couples in ads. So tell me what that number should be, IYHO.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:22 pm to IceTiger
quote:
That reasoning is complete bull shite.
If you wanted to "attract people that look like me"...
Then the largest margin would be whites of German backgrounds and Hispanic with Mexican backgrounds.
You ain't advertising to 6% if you even go by your logic. This is a sociology experiment in real time, not targeted advertising.
You also can't strictly go off population demographics. You have to consider the household wealth of your target audience.
Your average Asian/Indian family may purchase more than your average Black/Hispanic family due to differences in income.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:24 pm to RoosterCogburn585
I don't know, but it's really strange.
I personally know of only two interracial couples and I know thousands of people.
I personally know of only two interracial couples and I know thousands of people.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:38 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
I personally know of only two interracial couples and I know thousands of people.
I also know thousands of people. I've lost count of the number of IR couples I've met.
Probably just depends on the company you keep in general
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:43 pm to Azkiger
quote:
We shouldn't be worrying about what the numbers are.
Then why are you? All this talk of "disproportionate," clearly there's some metric by which you wish to curtail such. What is it?
quote:
Progressives want higher and higher numbers.
When it comes to people who don't view skin color as a mitigating metric, numbers going up or down shouldn't matter in the slightest, tbh.
quote:
Conservatives are getting called out for noticing what the progressives are doing.
This isn't really a conservative/progressive thing, much as you'd like it to be. Like I mentioned earlier, go on "black Twitter" and start championing interracial couples in ads, and you'll get a very different reaction than you'd expect from such "progressives."
Posted on 12/13/22 at 1:14 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Then why are you?
Because it's a battleground progressives have chosen.
quote:
All this talk of "disproportionate," clearly there's some metric by which you wish to curtail such. What is it?
Any reference I've made of disproportionality was made to show that progressives, despite what they claim, aren't after parity. They'll start off saying some demographic isn't properly represented, but push well beyond that when they grasp the levers of power.
The only metric that's setting off my alarms is the progressive focus on all things race, sex, gender identity, etc.
When they turn their attention to something, so do I.
quote:
When it comes to people who don't view skin color as a mitigating metric, numbers going up or down shouldn't matter in the slightest, tbh.
Same goes for gender.
How would you feel if conservative organizations all of a sudden started pushing to have only white males present in media (music, movies, commercials, etc.)?
I mean, people who don't care about skin color or gender shouldn't care that that's being pushed, right?
My alarm goes off when there's an attempt to social engineer.
quote:
This isn't really a conservative/progressive thing, much as you'd like it to be. Like I mentioned earlier, go on "black Twitter" and start championing interracial couples in ads, and you'll get a very different reaction than you'd expect from such "progressives."
Oh, I know. Hence why I keep saying progressive and not Democrat.
This is absolutely a progressive thing.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 1:57 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Patting themselves on the back. I don't think there is anyway that it helps their advertising effectiveness.
I guess it allows them to walk the line between having all whites or all blacks in an ad.
I guess they think they will p!ss people off if they have all one race in their ads.
I guess it allows them to walk the line between having all whites or all blacks in an ad.
I guess they think they will p!ss people off if they have all one race in their ads.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 2:06 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Again, I’m with you. Pimp standing next to you.
But here is my point.
Love and acceptance good.
Being bludgeoned by Cultural conformity bad.
But here is my point.
Love and acceptance good.
Being bludgeoned by Cultural conformity bad.
This post was edited on 12/13/22 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 12/13/22 at 3:11 pm to RoosterCogburn585
I find it hilarious that ITT everyone is debating as to why, or even if (LOL), there has been a tidal wave of interracial, racially substituted, and homosexual focal points in adverts in the last two years. AS IF, advertisers just had an epiphany on what "works" to sell people their products. These companies have been working in the dark arts of persuasion in our consumer society for decades and have it down to a ridiculous science. They didn't just all figure out that these tactics would make more money, they would have already done it if it made more money, they've all been told to do it.
It's a small part of Psy-ops to validate all the marxist bullshite of the 2020 revolution unfolded against us. All of us.
It's a small part of Psy-ops to validate all the marxist bullshite of the 2020 revolution unfolded against us. All of us.
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 12/13/22 at 3:18 pm to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
What is the basis/benefit for all of these advertisers having interracial couples
Their masters said to!
It is a conspiracy. This is some weak circumstantial evidence of the conspiracy.
Popular
Back to top



0







