- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What has Q Anon correctly predicted?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 9:40 am to ApexTiger
Posted on 6/3/18 at 9:40 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Q is said to be military insiders who were sick of the BS corruption and are working with Trump to slowly drain the cesspool.
Inside the ‘Q Group,’ the Directorate Hunting Down Edward Snowden
I found this article to be an interesting insight into the possible identity of Q. Notice it was released around the date, 6/10/13, the date followers of Q claim to be important in the incoming weeks. 6/11 being the anticipated release of OIG report according to some posters. I personally think Q’s purpose is for deception of these people who claim to be red-pilled and awake. However, I will say that many have probably been awakened to some things that are going on behind the scenes but we are most likely in the dark on the bigger plan that is in the works or already in place. But what the hell do I know? I’m just another dumb-arse looking for that reliable and omniscient tigerdropping’s source to shite out that crumb of evidence that explains everything.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 11:55 am
Posted on 6/3/18 at 10:08 am to Widespread Panic
Thread is straying. Anything specific that Q has correctly predicted?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 10:35 am to supatigah
At first I read that like you were replying to me. I was like "welp, alright." 
Posted on 6/3/18 at 10:41 am to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
Word. That makes sense. So is it safe to say nothing yet has been correctly predicted however a lot of small predictions are leading to an unveiling soon? I can get on board with that if that’s what’s going on? I was under the assumption Q already successfully predicted events
You totally miss the point. This isn't about predictions coming true. Q isn't some modern day nostradamus. Q presents information, that information has been used to redpill millions. People that are waiting for predictions to come true or for perp walks on a massive scale are setting themselves up for disappointment will only cause divisiveness.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:27 am to lsu480
quote:
You know how to search the Q archives. Go back to the beginning, it most certainly is him
That's like me showing a tweet that says white people need to be wiped out and saying that it's Obama.
Again... I don't see his name on it.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:32 am to Stacked
quote:
In times where people are willfully blind, a group has gathered around a meterorologist. His only tool, looking up at the dark clouds and predicting rain.
I thought this thread was about Qanon, not Al Gore.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:36 am to bencoleman
quote:
Q presents information, that information has been used to redpill millions.
No. Now this is the first point i completely disagree with on here.
Presenting cryptic information isn't presenting information at all. That's allowing people to believe whatever they want, again, through confirmation bias.
I already explained that earlier in this thread with the whole "clowns leaving N. Korea".
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:49 am to bencoleman
quote:
You totally miss the point. This isn't about predictions coming true. Q isn't some modern day nostradamus. Q presents information, that information has been used to redpill millions.
Info like the fake EO or hildawgs imminent arrest? I presume the red pill is as tainted as the flavoraid in jonestown.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:52 am to GeorgeTheGreek
What's interesting about this thread is the illustration of a concept to which I subscribe. This concept is that people believe what they want to believe, and seek out confirmation from places considered authorities so they can continue existing in the world the way they want to perceive it. Until someone is convicted to change their thought or belief system, facts (yes, actual facts) that are perceived as going against the grain of their self created reality will be completely dismissed.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:53 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Info like the fake EO or hildawgs imminent arrest
You'll have to be more specific than some EO or Hillary being arrested on such and such date. You don't sound like you know much about it to begin with.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 11:57 am to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
resenting cryptic information isn't presenting information at all. That's allowing people to believe whatever they want, again, through confirmation bias
This is ridiculous. We wouldn't know a damn thing about some of this corruption and how deep it goes without Q. If you don't believe that a mountain of information has been brought to light then I don't know what to tell you and you've got a confirmation bias problem of your own.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:02 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
That was April the 3rd.
LINK
quote:
All the Catholic bishops in Chile have resigned over a sex abuse scandal
By Delia Gallagher, CNN
Updated 10:51 AM ET, Fri May 18, 2018
34 priests involved.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:07 pm to bencoleman
quote:
If you don't believe that a mountain of information has been brought to light
What specific information has been brought to light? Where can I go to see a summary of this type of information?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:26 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
What specific information has been brought to light? Where can I go to see a summary of this type of information
There's a 2000 page thread on it are you being dense on purpose?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:26 pm to bencoleman
quote:
You'll have to be more specific than
I should've been more cryptic and had lines drawn everywhere, sorry.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:27 pm to Jjdoc
What does that have to do with the Pope? The Church has been having these scandals for years. A "bad May" is extremely vague. With a worldwide organization something is bound to happen. Who are the people supporting him that were pushed into the light? To be the Pope he had to get a majority of the Cardinals. I'm sure most priests support him.
Is this Pope going anywhere? Though I wish he'd quit, he's firmly ensconced and having no real problems.
Is this Pope going anywhere? Though I wish he'd quit, he's firmly ensconced and having no real problems.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:28 pm to Jjdoc
Catholic sex scandal, totally unpredictable and hasn't happened countless times. What's Q gonna allude to next, large drug bust at the border?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:30 pm to bencoleman
Nobody with sense wants to read through that rubbish. OP asked a simple question that has yet to be answered. One would figure that in a 2,000 page thread there would be a couple acorns found by the blind squirrel.
Popular
Back to top


1







