- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What happens to our system after this, is this what we want,you want Dems with this power?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:47 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:47 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't know about this situation, but this was my and boosie's point in one of the threads about the Columbia guy. Be careful, because that terrorism label will get turned on you for speech or a cause you support, like J6
Oh ya mean like being a Trump supporter and the biggest threat to democracy???? Eat shite and die Marxist scum!
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:59 pm to Eurocat
quote:
That has been their job since Marburry vs Madison over 200 years ago.
That’s what I was thinking.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:02 pm to Eurocat
quote:
That has been their job since Marburry vs Madison over 200 years ago.
The judge is willfully ignoring the powers of the executive branch for base political reasons.
If the judicial order is being ignored it’s because the judicial branch is no longer apolitical and is trying to usurp the powers specifically granted to the President.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:12 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Yes, I'm OK with democrats having the power to deport non-citizen terrorist associates.
The current DOJ argument and larger MAGA argument is a bit more than just that framed position.
DOJ is arguing they can invoke all sorts of "military" based laws without a military conflict and then they have no oversight by anyone. This is much larger than just deportation.
And this isn't something shocking. MAGA spent 4 years melting about the "domestic terror" label for this EXACT reason.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
DOJ is arguing they can evoke all sorts of "military" based laws without a military conflict
Which “military” based laws?
Be specific.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:14 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't know about this situation, but this was my and boosie's point in one of the threads about the Columbia guy. Be careful, because that terrorism label will get turned on you for speech or a cause you support, like J6.
Biden and his ilk (you, apparently) called me, and anyone like me, a domestic terrorist for 4 years. GFY
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they have no oversight by anyone.
So how do you have such “insight” into the matter?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:17 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So how do you have such “insight” into the matter?
By reading
quote:
Finally, even if the Court’s order had purported to enjoin the government from taking steps overseas pursuant to the Proclamation, that still would not restrict the President from exercising his other authorities under the Constitution to engage in diplomatic negotiations and to protect the United States from dangerous terrorists and criminals already outside the country.
quote:
These inherent Article II powers, especially when exercised outside the United States, are not subject to judicial review or intervention.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:18 pm to Eurocat
The process is the punishment. This is how the Democrats have been operating with impunity, and this is how they should be treated. Perhaps when both sides have been gutted this way there will be a majority who will bring back comity. Until then, gut those MFers!!!
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The current DOJ argument and larger MAGA argument is a bit more than just that framed position. DOJ is arguing they can invoke all sorts of "military" based laws without a military conflict and then they have no oversight by anyone. This is much larger than just deportation. And this isn't something shocking. MAGA spent 4 years melting about the "domestic terror" label for this EXACT reason.

Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
So you are against the US deporting terrorists?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:23 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Be careful, because that terrorism label will get turned on you for speech or a cause you support, like J6.
It already was. We were blocked from social media for telling the truth about the origins of covid. You are warning us not to FA because we will FO, but what we are doing now is the FO to the Democrats FA.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:23 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So you are against the US deporting terrorists?

Enter the irrelevant talking points

I'm discussing the Democrats wielding this power by using these interpretations/arguments when they regain power. I do not want them to do so.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you have the same feeling when the judiciary blocked Biden from doing so? When he followed that order? Those are better questions for OP

Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:24 pm to lake chuck fan
My point is, you guys should stand up for free speech all the way around instead of wanting your pound of flesh against people who have different political opinions.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:24 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
That's not even the correct use of the meme 

Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:25 pm to Penrod
That's fine, I get it. But, you're really no better than them when you want the system used against political opponents.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:29 pm to Bunk Moreland
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
I could only imagine the absolute fricking meltdown on here had the Biden DOJ argued something like this

This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 6:29 pm
Popular
Back to top
