- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What Crime did Tulsi accuse Obama of committing?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Obama needs to be in cuffs
How is he not immune, is the question, within your hypo.[/quote]
Keep "white-knighting" for the fraud, fool.
1
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:50 pm to Wednesday
Unless they involved a foreign country in their antics...and then they're fricked.
That's it. They could have done all this and probably scated....foreign country involvement; however, escalates this shite.
I have no idea whether they did or not; but, that is the only way she can make that connection.
That's it. They could have done all this and probably scated....foreign country involvement; however, escalates this shite.
I have no idea whether they did or not; but, that is the only way she can make that connection.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:51 pm to LookSquirrel
The problem with sedition is that the plan was to remove him via lawful means: impeach and a trial to remove. That is not sedition.
Obstrucion of justice? When did Obama talk to any federal official investigating the matter? If Obama did, then there is a chance depending on what he said and if the SOL has not run out.
Obstrucion of justice? When did Obama talk to any federal official investigating the matter? If Obama did, then there is a chance depending on what he said and if the SOL has not run out.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:51 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
I've concluded the most we can hope for is taking away his status
The opposite is likely to occur, if Trump's DOJ really FA's.
Obama coming out victorious against a Trump admin that's targeting political enemies improperly, only to be saved by the institutions that Trump is trying to attack (in order to further these nefarious, terrible political reasons), is the Left and MSM's wet dream scenario. It would make all the fake stuff they created during Russiagate become real.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:51 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
18 U.S.C. § 2384
I don't think this activity can be considered an "overthrow" of the government; it was an abuse of a legal process. Plus, there was no "force" involved - only subterfuge. I also don't think that Jan 6 was an attempt to overthrow the government, even for those idiots who punched people or committed vandalism.
I stand by my original assessment - they falsified documents to create a fake prosecution and a fake impeachment. That's obstruction of justice, and it's just as bad of a felony as sedition.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:51 pm to omegaman66
quote:
half black
Technically, not even.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:51 pm to KCT
quote:
Keep "white-knighting" for the fraud, fool.
My comments do no such thing, and anyone with an IQ over 85 will understand why.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:53 pm to JimEverett
quote:
The problem with sedition is that the plan was to remove him via lawful means: impeach and a trial to remove. That is not sedition.
Exactly.
And they never even impeached him, or even really tried to, for Russiagate.
This is why you see them trying to expand the conspiracy based on hopium and not logic or evidence.
quote:
Obstrucion of justice? When did Obama talk to any federal official investigating the matter?
What investigation was ongoing when they were enacting Russiagate? How can you obstruct justice in the past?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:53 pm to Wednesday
quote:
we hate you so we can charge you bullshite.
Let's go with this.
I don't care if he walks the same day.
I want to see his mugshot in an orange jumpsuit.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:54 pm to Wednesday
quote:
I stand by my original assessment - they falsified documents to create a fake prosecution and a fake impeachment. That's obstruction of justice
Ignoring all of the opinion and subjectivity involved....how? What proceeding/investigation did they obstruct?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
"IQ over 85..."
Well then, how would you qualify?
Well then, how would you qualify?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:55 pm to LSUbest
quote:
I don't care if he walks the same day.
I want to see his mugshot in an orange jumpsuit.
When the conspiracy theories won't work, you get the emotional types posting silliness like this.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:55 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Obstrucion of justice? When did Obama talk to any federal official investigating the matter? If Obama did, then there is a chance depending on what he said and if the SOL has not run out.
On December 9, 2016, Obama met with Brennan, Clapper, and the gang and instructed them to write a knowingly false intelligence report. They formed a plan to create a fake report. This fake report was later used to brief the House Intelligence Committee, to justify fake FISA Warrants and other knowingly false shite, up to and including a fake impeachment.
There was plenty of obstruction going on, and misrepresentation in government reports.
If we're going to prosecute a former president, we should charge him with a real crime. Obstruction of justice is a real crime.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:55 pm to Wednesday
The bottom line is that our deep state usual suspects had a scorching case of the literally can't evens when it came to Trump beating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
They launched a multi-pronged attack seeking to undo the results of that 2016 election, and every last bit of it was attempted to be done through lawful channels, but was predicated on blatantly false intelligence and we were just supposed to believe the people who double pinky swore that it was true.
They launched a multi-pronged attack seeking to undo the results of that 2016 election, and every last bit of it was attempted to be done through lawful channels, but was predicated on blatantly false intelligence and we were just supposed to believe the people who double pinky swore that it was true.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:56 pm to Houag80
quote:
Well then, how would you qualify?
Brother, I was in Gifted, which is a 130 min IQ
We will ignore that within the Gifted population I was around for a decade plus, I was considered at the top of the intelligence rankings
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:56 pm to Wednesday
quote:Did she ever outright say this? I remember she said "treasonous conspiracy" in her original statement, which she could plausibly argue she was using "treasonous" colloquially if pressed.
This is the definition of Treason (which Tulsi said he did)
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:57 pm to Wednesday
quote:
On December 9, 2016, Obama met with Brennan, Clapper, and the gang and instructed them to write a knowingly false intelligence report.
And? How is that obstruction?
quote:
Obstruction of justice is a real crime.
A real crime that doesn't really fit at all.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are so easy to bait...you baby back bitch.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:59 pm to Wednesday
What you are describing is not obstruction. There was no legal proceeding or formal investigation at the time.
Now, if Obama was interviewed as part of the Mueller investigation then that could potentially open him to obstruction.
Now, if Obama was interviewed as part of the Mueller investigation then that could potentially open him to obstruction.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 4:00 pm to VoxDawg
I agree. But criminal prosecutions are based on specific elements, of specifically defined crimes with proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
All I'm saying is - all this gray talking about "treason" and "sedition" and deep state is probably true; but it will truly prevent a prosecution and a conviction if it's not based on the elements of a crime.
Obama is the most anti-American president in history - I wouldn't just want him arrested - I would want it to be for an actual crime - bc that way - he could actually shite his pants and be convicted. ESPESCIALLY bc I think that Mar-a-Lago raid and the entire "classified documents" case were acts in furtherance of Obama's conspiracy that were committed far beyond the time period where Obama would be able to claim execuitve immunity, and far far away from Tanya Chutkin, Boasberg and the rest of those frauds in the DC District Court
All I'm saying is - all this gray talking about "treason" and "sedition" and deep state is probably true; but it will truly prevent a prosecution and a conviction if it's not based on the elements of a crime.
Obama is the most anti-American president in history - I wouldn't just want him arrested - I would want it to be for an actual crime - bc that way - he could actually shite his pants and be convicted. ESPESCIALLY bc I think that Mar-a-Lago raid and the entire "classified documents" case were acts in furtherance of Obama's conspiracy that were committed far beyond the time period where Obama would be able to claim execuitve immunity, and far far away from Tanya Chutkin, Boasberg and the rest of those frauds in the DC District Court
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News