- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are your reasons for believing climate change is "a hoax"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 6:57 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 3/7/18 at 6:57 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Its 2018. I’m in the modeling business. Resolution isn’t really an issue.
Not really, not to the resolution they need.
quote:Actulally both do. The grid size ssue ain’t due to lack of computing power. It’s due to amateur modeling techniques, and inability of them (Not us!) to solve sparse discontinuous state variables. So they just “average” everything into larger spatial distributions to “smooth” it out.
doesn't seem to support your point
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 7:09 pm
0
Posted on 3/7/18 at 6:58 pm to Powerman
quote:Thst would be incredibly stupid. Though unsurprising... no one asked you do that. Hell, I follow it a lot closer than you do.
I will completely ignore all further scientific development on this issue since you have supreme knowledge on the matter.
quote:That quote has literally nothing to do with a consipiracy. But that is for letting us know you don’t comprehend it.
I'm almost sold on the conspiracy from this anecdote.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:03 pm to LSUconvert
quote:Well when you say it like that.....
Because what you're implying is that there are several thousand scientists all in on some elaborate scheme.
... it’s a complete strawman.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:04 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Actually, the ability to manipulate language to the point that those who disagree with you nevertheless adopt what you want something to be called pretty much unabashedly away from what they REALLY WANT IT TO BE sounds like a doozy of a conspiracy in and of itself.
or plain’ol namecalling. Notice not a single modeling defense has been floated by the OP. Not one. . This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:09 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
That quote has literally nothing to do with a consipiracy. But that is for letting us know you don’t comprehend it.
I know. But I found it humorous that you decided to use the anecdote about your belief in the conspiracy.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:11 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Thats exactly what he was saying. Many modelers get caught up in saying the real world isn’t how the model is defining—they start to blame physical observations-instead of their models. Spend some time looking and you’ll see that claim Odenton in he climate modeling community. They have energy taken to claiming missing heat they predicted is in all sorts of hidden places. It’s entertaining if one knows basic thermo (like heat rises!).
Perhaps if he had said, "It's probably your hypothesis that's broke." then that would've supported your point better.
If you any other modeling questions illl let poeerman answer them. He can count to at least 100.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:14 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Notice not a single modeling defense has been floated by the OP. Not one. .
Computer models tell you what you tell it. It's very easy to manipulate the data to show what you want it to show. GIGO..garbage in...garbage out.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:18 pm to Powerman
quote:
But I found it humorous that you decided to use the anecdote about your belief in the conspiracy.
Thst’s what you think that was? You should stick to counting. Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:22 pm to Taxing Authority
wait, there is no multi-variant regression equation for “climate change”? where did all this 95% confidence come from?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:24 pm to Rock the Casbah
Will have and has had ZERO affect on my or my families life. Don’t care what may happen a few hundred years from now. I’ll be worm food long before any supposed detrimental conditions occur.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:29 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
If you any other modeling questions illl let poeerman answer them. He can count to at least 100
Right. I don't deal with modeling. Sounds like you do. Let me be the first to say congrats.
Unfortunately for me your experience with computer modeling is not sufficient evidence to qualify you as superior to the sum of all research on the matter. I know. Crazy.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:34 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Notice not a single modeling defense has been floated by the OP. Not one. .
I'm not sure why you think I would need to do such a thing.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:35 pm to Rock the Casbah
quote:
where did all this 95% confidence come from?
The Illuminati of course
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:43 pm to Powerman
quote:
to the sum of all research on the matter.
This is also bullsjit.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:49 pm to Dale51
quote:
This is also bullsjit.
The sum of all of the research on the mat points heavily to the side of humans having an impact. Consider yourself one of the fortunate enlightened few that happens to be browsing the poliboard today. Taxing authority is also an authority on climate science and his observations are more important than the rest of the research on the matter. We just happened to be in the right place at the right time to be imparted with such supreme knowledge.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:52 pm to Powerman
quote:
quote:
Liberalism
Has nothing to do with science
Neither does the funding for the "scientists," especially those who have made a career on government funded "research."
Posted on 3/7/18 at 7:53 pm to SoulGlo
quote:
Neither does the funding for the "scientists," especially those who have made a career on government funded "research."
So do you think the conclusions of their research is bogus?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 8:02 pm to Giventofly
quote:
Don’t care what may happen a few hundred years from now. I’ll be worm food long before any supposed detrimental conditions occur.
And this is why the cause is really a moot point.
If we stop emitting CO2, methane, and other greenhouse gases tomorrow,
the first reversal effects wouldn't even be noticed for 500 years, minimum.
You won't get people to make major life changes for something 500 years from now. Forget about it.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 8:04 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Thst would be incredibly stupid. Though unsurprising... no one asked you do that. Hell, I follow it a lot closer than you do.
Well, he "follows" it by counting.
You're going to reach 50 pages in this thread without him actually expressing an idea of his own.
Have fun.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 8:10 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
You're going to reach 50 pages in this thread without him actually expressing an idea of his own.
Probably won't see me trying to add any new ideas to the study of electromagnetic fields either. Guess since I'm not going to add new remarks on the topic in this thread we will assume it to be bullshite in the meantime.
Page 35 of 40
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News