- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We’ve replaced Ayatollah Khamenei
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:14 pm to DyeHardDylan
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:14 pm to DyeHardDylan
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:18 pm to DyeHardDylan
I see all kinds of comedians making fun of their own people lately.. Even they are embarrassed
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Based on the football spiking and claims of early victory and success, many apparently did not.
This is nonsense, and I suspect you know that it is. Hell, there's not enough time between Ayatollah replacements to do any football spiking.
I place the over/under of this Ayatollah at 5 days.
Edit,
after additional recollection, I realized that indeed there was more than moderate amount of football spiking. The Iranian people were doing quite a large amount of celebration and spiking.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:31 pm to DyeHardDylan
I'm sure this one won't be motivated by his religion at all and will be totally compliant to US will.

Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
We are nine days in and you are acting like the mission is a failure. SMH. Are we no longer hitting targets?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:49 pm to geoag58
quote:
We are nine days in and you are acting like the mission is a failure.
No
Nice straw man though
The post you responded to wasn't even commenting on the operation directly. It was about the MAGA reaction to the operation.
The operation has done well so far. Shows us we could (should?) have been more active in Ukraine without much worry
Posted on 3/8/26 at 7:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My comment was not limited to American/Israeli officials, or really towards them at all.
Whether it was or wasn’t, do you really think they or anyone else cares about your opinion?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
SFP
And also SFP
You were against it before you were for it. And now you feel we should have opted for a two front war?
What happened?
quote:
said THIS war is bad, and isn't likely to lead to positive outcomes
And also SFP
quote:
The operation has done well so far. Shows us we could (should?) have been more active in Ukraine without much worry
You were against it before you were for it. And now you feel we should have opted for a two front war?
What happened?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:08 pm to geoag58
quote:
You were against it before you were for it.
You're conflating
I am against the war
That doesn't mean I'm going to say that it hasn't gone well so far.
Here is the problem:
We are at the very beginning of this conflict if we're going to actually enact real change, and if we're we're towards the middle or end of this conflict, then we're not really going to do anything over the long term.
quote:
And now you feel we should have opted for a two front war?
No
quote:
What happened?
Nothing except your conflation.
Now the question is if that was dishonesty on purpose or due to lack of ability
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We are at the very beginning of this conflict if we're going to actually enact real change, and if we're we're towards the middle or end of this conflict, then we're not really going to do anything over the long term.
We aren’t going to do anything. You and I have no say in this. I have served in the military, I doubt you have. You still haven’t learned that your opinion doesn’t matter.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Based on the football spiking and claims of early victory and success, many apparently did not.
I’m sure you will be nowhere to be found once the heir is blown up in an airstrike.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
All war is bad.
You don't need to contribute anything.
That is baseline understood.
I said THIS war is bad, and isn't likely to lead to positive outcomes.
It's not about a "baseline" or "all war is bad" statement, which I never made.
There was your exchange where you said this war is bad.
If we had more involvement in Ukraine (> $130 billion in aid)and Iran saw it as an opportunity to turn up the heat with Israel. You think that would have a better outcome than dealing with Iran now.
You need to make your meaning clear before you call people dishonest.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:23 pm to geoag58
quote:
You need to make your meaning clear before you call people dishonest.
He is an attorney, part of his job.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:30 pm to Shorter Yards
quote:
You still haven’t learned that your opinion doesn’t matter.
This is a message board.
It's not the Pentagon
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:30 pm to Riverside
quote:
I’m sure you will be nowhere to be found once the heir is blown up in an airstrike.
Why would I not show up?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:31 pm to geoag58
quote:
You need to make your meaning clear before you call people dishonest.
My message is clear
I can't help your conflation
After that post, I'm leaning towards ability and not dishonesty to explain it.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 8:32 pm
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
I think the biggest problem with this war is that we have nobody on the ground trying to drum up or organize opposition. For that reason, this might be a failure.
Seems like this could devolve into a cluster of chaos.
Seems like this could devolve into a cluster of chaos.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:38 pm to DyeHardDylan
Barron should challenge him to one-on-one combat and settle this
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:49 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
Seems like this could devolve into a cluster of chaos.
That is certainly a very real possibility
We could solve that with forced regime change but that would require "boots in the ground" and that option presents its own issues.
Or we eventually give up killing the successors and claim victory and they just rebuild (like what happened after the strikes last year).
Popular
Back to top



0







