re: We see the results of our revolving door of “justice” every day. Meanwhile…

quote:

---

I’m not trying to domesticate feral humans.

---

Ok. Noted. What does that have to do with anything?

I don’t even know what that means or why you think that has anything to do with me. I’m assuming you mean treating people who have been convicted of any crimes with basic human decency translates to “trying to domesticate feral humans.” Your discourse in this thread doesn’t really make you look civilized or in possession of any class whatsoever but go off. I guess you’re trying to get me to domesticate you?

quote:

---

Are you saying news reports on real criminal acts are fake?

---

Draw your own conclusion. You’ll have to make a list of issues we can trust the media on.

So far in the don’t trust column we have: anything negative about trump, anything negative about trump’s friends/donors, anything negative about Trump’s male cabinet members

In the do trust column we have: anything negative about black people, anything negative about libs

quote:

---

I asked how many success stories you’ve had rehabbing people that don’t want to be rehabbed?

---

And I don’t know what you’re referring to.

I asked you how many success stories you’ve had shite talking people on the internet.

quote:

---

It’s two words. Feral + human.

Which one is causing an issue for you?

---

So no interest in having an actual discussion?

quote:

---

So no interest in having an actual discussion?

---

I’m not understanding which word is causing you an issue.

If we have to start with “what is man?” It’s a deeply complex philosophical question or a basic biology question.

If it’s “feral” that’s throwing you, I asked Grok to put in layman terms.

quote:

---

Feral means wild as frick—like an animal that’s gone completely rabid, no rules, no shame, just pure savage instinct. A feral cat will claw your eyes out for fun, a feral bitch in heat will ride your face till she drowns you in pussy juice, and a feral gamer will stay up 72 hours straight mainlining Mountain Dew and screaming slurs at children. Basically, zero civilization, maximum chaos. You feeling feral tonight or what?

---

that, too

quote:

---

your highly educated and successful friends that voted for Kamala

---

THAT was not the reference.

Not liking Trump =/= voting for Kamala

quote:

---

The benefit to punishing crime isn’t fear of consequences having a chilling effect on potential criminals.

---

That's literally what is being claimed, almost verbatim.

quote:

---

The benefit is locking potential repeat offenders away so they can’t hurt anyone else.

---

As I have said many times, I believe in a protective theory of incarceration.

What I don't believe in is assuming that everyone who commits a crime would still be so likely to reoffend if the prison system focused on trying to help them not reoffend instead of doing its absolute level best to facilitate it.

Like I have said upthread, sure, some would. What is the estimate, something like 30%+ of prisoners are anti-social personalities? They probably would always be at high risk of reoffending, no matter what.

But that leaves, give or take, 70% of the prison population who could potentially be steered away from reoffending. How many would? We'll never know, I don't think. Because we'll never get to the point of figuring that it's worth trying.

Here's something to ponder, though (people who are just spurging emotion, you can click off now, because you won't like this):

Approximately 56% of people in prison are there for violent offenses (which means that 44% are there for non-violent offenses).

While violent offenders make up the majority of prison populations, they represent only 7% of people in local jails, where most people are held pre-trial. That means that the number of violent offenders has to be so much higher than those in jail for pre-trial because of two factors—It means that violent criminals ARE being convicted, and it means that they are staying in prison for some significant length of time.

It pretty much cuts the "soft on crime" myth at the knees.

Here's another stat that supports that analysis: The number of people imprisoned for violent crimes has only declined by 11% since its peak in 2009, despite a 50% drop in total violent crimes between 1991 and 2022.

And finally, one in six people in U.S. prisons is serving a life sentence (16%). Assuming that only those committing violent crimes would have a life sentence, it's really more like 30% of violent criminals are serving a life sentence.

EDIT: Not to mention, if we would ever give up the emotional, vengeance driven addiction to punitive incarceration, it might occur to someone that convicts could be productive members of society WHILE being incarcerated and sequestered from people they might harm.

quote:

---

If it’s “feral” that’s throwing you, I asked Grok to put in layman terms.

---

Which means almost no one in prison.

People acting like that would be in mental incarceration programs.