- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We see the results of our revolving door of “justice” every day. Meanwhile…
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:24 pm to Rebel
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:24 pm to Rebel
quote:
Tell us some of your success stories rehabbing feral humans
What are you talking about? Maybe you can share your success stories off how many victims were made whole again by your dehumanizing anonymous “criminals” on an internet message board.
How many lives have you saved from behind your keyboard? You’ve certainly had more of a positive impact on society using your strategy of shite talking in the internet. The hero we don’t deserve…
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:25 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Laken Riley has no recourse either. No due process.
Are you for making what happened to her legal?
If not, I don't think you understand the discussion, given that you think that is some sort of comparable retort.
quote:
Is it either this or that? Being too soft or too hard on crime?
Well, that is exactly why I would encourage us to get out of only the punitive model of incarceration and start considering some different approaches.
Because yeah, probably. As long as we're stuck in that and refuse to see it any other way, that might be the indefinite conundrum.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:26 pm to Miketheseventh
quote:
Open any news site. It’s always blacks doing the crime
We don’t trust the media when they report negative things about a trump or Republicans, but we trust them when they report negative things about black people.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:27 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Are you for making what happened to her legal?
No. Any other brain busters?
quote:
Well, that is exactly why I would encourage us to get out of only the punitive model of incarceration and start considering some different approaches.
Perhaps this “soft on crime”‘strategy is the other approach, and it’s far worse than the other model of being tough on crime.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
No. Any other brain busters?
What's funny is that it must actually be a brain buster for you. You still don't get why that was a retarded thing to say in the context of the discussion.
quote:
Perhaps this “soft on crime”‘strategy is the other approach, and it’s far worse than the other model of being tough on crime.
Again, your comments indicate that you don't even understand what is being discussed.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:30 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
We don’t trust the media when they report negative things about a trump or Republicans, but we trust them when they report negative things about black people.
Are you saying news reports on real criminal acts are fake?
We have all seen the crime stats in these threads in the past. Are they fake? If they includes Hispanics with whites, that part might be, but the other part?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:32 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
You still don't get why that was a retarded thing to say in the context of the discussion.
Typically referencing Lakyn Riley is bad enough, but he used it incorrectly on multiple fronts
Mind-blowing, really.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 7:32 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Again, your comments indicate that you don't even understand what is being discussed.
His inability to form/communicate a coherent and cohesive argument without NPC talking points is the first sign.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:19 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Again, your comments indicate that you don't even understand what is being discussed.
We are discussing being soft on crime vs hard on crime. Try to keep up.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
His inability to form/communicate a coherent and cohesive argument without NPC talking points is the first sign.
Muh NPC!
- slow
Is that a recycled deflection from years ago?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Typically referencing Lakyn Riley is bad enough, but he used it incorrectly on multiple fronts
Shocking you don’t want to talk about Logan Federico.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:25 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Muh NPC
Like with the Lakyn Riley reference and the argument in general, you're having problems understanding what words mean
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:26 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Shocking you don’t want to talk about Logan Federico.
I only pointed out your issues with Lakyn Riley because of how absurd they were. I've already told you I'm discussing policy not people. You can reference infinite people and it doesn't matter. I'm discussing policy
Again, you don't understand what's even being discussed
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
We are discussing being soft on crime vs hard on crime.
No, that's not what was being discussed.
quote:
Try to keep up.
You're so far back in the rearview I can't even see you wave.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I've already told you I'm discussing policy not people. You can reference infinite people and it doesn't matter. I'm discussing policy
No matter how hard to flail, policies impact real people. There is no separating the 2. They go hand in hand. Liberal policy got Logan killed. It also got Laken killed. Many other too. Way too many to justify any of their policy nonsense, but you defend it all anyways/
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:31 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
No, that's not what was being discussed.
Perhaps you are confused. Go back to the first page.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Like with the Lakyn Riley reference and the argument in general, you're having problems understanding what words mean
Nothing but weak flames. You are so bad at explaining your points.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:42 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Perhaps you are confused.
Someone is, but it's not me.
quote:
Go back to the first page.
Why would I do that? The discussion I was having as well past page one.
You may have hit on the problem, though. Instead of everyone staying stuck with you back at the starting line, maybe you should join us 18 miles down the road.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:43 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
How many lives have you saved from behind your keyboard?
I’m not trying to domesticate feral humans. Locking up feral humans saves lives. Keeping those same feral humans in society destroys lives.
Do I save lives? I think a case could be made. But let’s suppose for a minute, the answer is zero. You however are at a net negative. How many lives have you destroyed by gaming the system to put animals back on the streets?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:45 pm to Rebel
quote:
I’m not trying to domesticate feral humans. Locking up feral humans saves lives. Keeping those same feral humans in society destroys lives.
For the purposes of having a discussion about this, can you define "feral humans?"
Popular
Back to top


1





