- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We Are Now Seeing What Q Was Predicting 7 Years Ago
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:47 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:47 pm to boosiebadazz
I can totally see how it would be really fun to do a gamified sense-making exercise with your friends with the end result being a kind of special knowledge that elevates you over others and makes you feel like you know what will happen next.
0
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:52 pm to BarnHater
quote:How so? What have I gotten wrong?
You’re out of your league. Vox is owning you
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:05 pm to KCT
quote:
the Q thread
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:08 pm to northshorebamaman
Congrats on asking a snarky question to ChatGPT? I'm not going to punt to AI or someone else's work on the matter, so this will likely take some time.
See my above reply to Ambulance Chaser Royale
If you don't know the difference between indictments and arrests, we're gonna have a rough go of this. On would thin that even if you didn't know anything about grand jury transcripts, sealed indictments and how we don't know what we don't know about much of anything regarding grand jury indictments until they're unsealed at a later date, then last week's Epstein developments would suffice enough of an education, but here we are...
Abedin doesn't even show up in #22. You need better sources.
Again. Your AI sucks at this game. #44 has nothing to do with the National Guard or riots.
I've lost interest in the game, since your dEbOOnK of these has already proven to be wildly off-base, but I'll give you one for the road. Y'all live to key in on the mistaken belief that Q said much of anything outlandish about JFK Jr.
I hate it for you that Q drowned that particular rhetorical kitten in the river. That one is always so important to y'all.
quote:
Prediction: Hillary Clinton arrested by 10/30/17.
See my above reply to Ambulance Chaser Royale
quote:
Drop #15 – Nov 1, 2017
Prediction: Podesta arrested 11/3/17.
Reality: Didn’t even get a parking ticket.
If you don't know the difference between indictments and arrests, we're gonna have a rough go of this. On would thin that even if you didn't know anything about grand jury transcripts, sealed indictments and how we don't know what we don't know about much of anything regarding grand jury indictments until they're unsealed at a later date, then last week's Epstein developments would suffice enough of an education, but here we are...
quote:
Drop #22 – Nov 1, 2017
Prediction: Huma Abedin also arrested.
Reality: Also no.
Abedin doesn't even show up in #22. You need better sources.
quote:
Drop #44 – Nov 2, 2017
Prediction: National Guard activated to manage riots.
Reality: They stayed home.
Again. Your AI sucks at this game. #44 has nothing to do with the National Guard or riots.
I've lost interest in the game, since your dEbOOnK of these has already proven to be wildly off-base, but I'll give you one for the road. Y'all live to key in on the mistaken belief that Q said much of anything outlandish about JFK Jr.
I hate it for you that Q drowned that particular rhetorical kitten in the river. That one is always so important to y'all.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:14 pm to VoxDawg
quote:You could do it quickly by just showing the falsifiable claims that actually worked out.
so this will likely take some time
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:15 pm to VoxDawg
Did anything in #15 happen? Biden or a worse surrogate took over. Abedin and Podesta happy as clams.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:16 pm to KCT
Yes, bring the thread back. Why in the world would it have even been removed in the first place?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:17 pm to Flats
quote:
You see an ink blot. And it's whatever the hell you need it to be.
Been a tough couple months for you hard core lefties.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:41 pm to VoxDawg
The whole Q thing was fun. Bring it back!
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:41 pm to Richleau
quote:
Yes, bring the thread back. Why in the world would it have even been removed in the first place?
Getting attention of three letter agencies under Biden?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:50 pm to Free888
lol, you think these boards aren’t already monitored? Please.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:51 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
That doesn't make any of those claims true.
But it’s true to them damnit…
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:57 pm to Richleau
quote:It has to be some of the funniest shite they read. Supervisors probably only let them read it 15 mins a day. Coffee all up in their keyboards and shite.
lol, you think these boards aren’t already monitored? Please
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:37 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Not that I expect anything less than the limpest of limp-dicked gotcha attempts from one of the most committed of nihilist contrarians on the board, of course.
My dear lord you are retarded.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:16 pm to Jake88
And yet fast forward to today, perhaps you should play catch up because boasberg was known for years as was the entire plot Tulsi is just now declassifying. You’re right, it’s hysterical. Further, if it was all just a joke, why remove it at all? Your logic doesn’t quite add up.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:19 pm to Richleau
quote:Because it was preposterous. An embarrassment to this site. Just see northshorebamaman's post of Q examples above in this thread.
You’re right, it’s hysterical. Further, if it was all just a joke, why remove it at all?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:26 pm to KCT
Whats sad not a thing will be done other than Fox News reporting on it
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:35 pm to Jake88
You have selective reading to think that was an embarrassment to the site. There’s plenty that qualify. Like me calling you a limp dick ****. Notice how that’s fine and dandy for this site but a thread about political intrigue was not. You seriously think that was the reason? Man, you’re a real retard.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:37 pm to Jake88
quote:
Because it was preposterous. An embarrassment to this site. Just see northshorebamaman's post of Q examples above in this thread.
It was interesting and informative to millions worldwide. As to an "embarrassment to this site?, Many here would disagree.
Hearing word of a "Q" comm coming soonish.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:37 pm to Richleau
quote:Yet you believed Q. Talk about a lack of insight.
Man, you’re a real retard
Page 7 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News