- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:07 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Don't pretend to act shocked.
Your entire Marxist party wants this.
This digression is a perfect example to use of how people will say stupid shite they're told to say and believe stupid shite they're told to believe, in the most irrational, yet sincere way.
This is a great example to extrapolate to the "individual Southerner" examples that keep popping up ITT.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
RogerTheShrubber
OH shite
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:08 pm to RFK
The Civil War was fought over one indisputable reason - States rights
Slavery was a worldwide issue. Yet only the US, under good ole Abe went to war with itself to solve the issue. You have to ask yourself why every other nation on the Earth (who all benefited from slave labor) was able to settle the issue without killing 600,000 men, women, and children?
Its because the war was never about slavery. The North adopted the issue years into the struggle, but it didnt start out that way. The South wanted to peacefully leave the Union, only 80 years after its formation. But Abe would never allow that
600K people dead. Entire American bloodlines wiped out. Over one mans zeal in protecting imaginary lines on a map
And to make it worse, we have devolved into a nation that half its citizens vote to now ignore those same lines, in regards to foreign peoples
Slavery was a worldwide issue. Yet only the US, under good ole Abe went to war with itself to solve the issue. You have to ask yourself why every other nation on the Earth (who all benefited from slave labor) was able to settle the issue without killing 600,000 men, women, and children?
Its because the war was never about slavery. The North adopted the issue years into the struggle, but it didnt start out that way. The South wanted to peacefully leave the Union, only 80 years after its formation. But Abe would never allow that
quote:
As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing," as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.
I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time save Slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy Slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it,
Yours,
A. LINCOLN
600K people dead. Entire American bloodlines wiped out. Over one mans zeal in protecting imaginary lines on a map
And to make it worse, we have devolved into a nation that half its citizens vote to now ignore those same lines, in regards to foreign peoples
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Self loathing isnt a good trait.
No where as bad as a grown adult making a asinine post showing he doesn't have a clue about the War between the states
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:10 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
The Civil War was fought over one indisputable reason - States rights
What was the key issue driving this promotion/defense of state's rights leading up to the Civil War? Slavery.
quote:
You have to ask yourself why every other nation on the Earth (who all benefited from slave labor) was able to settle the issue without killing 600,000 men, women, and children?
How many other countries had a part of the country try to break away to protect their right to engage in slavery?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:12 pm to RFK
quote:
Was the Civil War Fought Because of Slavery?
What is the point of this thread other than stirring up a debate? There have been hundreds - maybe thousands - of scholarly works addressing this question.,,, but, by all means, let's ask the TD PoliBoard before we consider the debate about something that happened 160 years ago closed!
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:12 pm to beerJeep
quote:
If the north fought to free slaves, why wouldn’t they free their own slaves until the ratification of the 13th?
We have a winner folks.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:13 pm to Joeypeeps787
quote:
Even if that was the issue it's not worth fighting a war.
I would have advised the South of this prior to them trying to secede and instigating that war. It wasn't worth it, especially with how industrialization was clearly coming.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How many other countries had a part of the country try to break away to protect their right to engage in slavery?
Facts, actual facts, have shown slavery was only 1 issue not the only issue. Remember only about 2% of the white population owned slaves. The south was being taxed unfairly for industrial goods manufactured in the north. There were actually numerous reasons for the war. Stating that slavery was the only reaso is doing a injustice to everyone that fought in the war.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:16 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
imaginary lines on a map
When you see our flag, your first thought is imaginary lines on a map represented by stars?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:17 pm to RFK
The retard bot is back with another retard topic that has been discussed here literally a thousand times already.
But..... since the retard bot believes it to be such a divisive topic, it posts it again.
This is obviously nothing more than the Marxist Dems attempt at propaganda designed to cause chaos, confusion, and disruption.
Ignore this retard bot. Don't feed it's energy.
But..... since the retard bot believes it to be such a divisive topic, it posts it again.
This is obviously nothing more than the Marxist Dems attempt at propaganda designed to cause chaos, confusion, and disruption.
Ignore this retard bot. Don't feed it's energy.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:17 pm to Joeypeeps787
quote:
How does seceding instigate a war?
Have you not heard of the Civil War?
quote:
Scandinavian nations have broken up and gotten back together many times without war
I imagine that's the minority example.
When parts of countries try to break away it is typically bloody.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:19 pm to El Eh Shu
quote:
Instead of asking why the War Between The States was fought, ask why the American government invaded the Southern states?
Damn straight!!
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:21 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
slavery was only 1 issue not the only issue.
Only one issue, yes, but it was the super predominate issue.
Like I said earlier, the other issues were so small that without the conflict around slavery for the decades leading up to the Civil War, it's unlikely secession ever occurs. Without secession there is no Civil War.
quote:
Stating that slavery was the only reaso is doing a injustice to everyone that fought in the war.
Who has said it was the literal only reason?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:21 pm to Narax
quote:
When you see our flag, your first thought is imaginary lines on a map represented by stars?
When he speaks of illegal immigration I guarantee you he doesn't see our border that way
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
SlowFlowPro you really need to read the issues of this country and that many states want to leave the union for years and none over slavery it is different issues and it is mostly northern states wanting to leave the Union.
And not one word is written about them not having the right to leave the Union.
We are taught is school by the history books bought by the schools' system.
These history books simplify many issues, like the civil war., World War I etc.
You do not have the time to teach the civil war in 9 months of school.
You have to cover the whole history of the US from the late 1500's until today leaving you 1 week or 2 at max to teach the history of the civil war.
In the 1970 we spend 1 week on the war.
Your getting a very simplified version of the war and making broad statements with little knowledge of the time or men.
And not one word is written about them not having the right to leave the Union.
We are taught is school by the history books bought by the schools' system.
These history books simplify many issues, like the civil war., World War I etc.
You do not have the time to teach the civil war in 9 months of school.
You have to cover the whole history of the US from the late 1500's until today leaving you 1 week or 2 at max to teach the history of the civil war.
In the 1970 we spend 1 week on the war.
Your getting a very simplified version of the war and making broad statements with little knowledge of the time or men.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only one issue, yes, but it was the super predominate issue.
That depends who you talked to. Only 2% of the white population owned slaves. The Southern people felt like the North was treating them as lower class people and unfairly taxing them.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:27 pm to evil cockroach
Yet both sides owned slaver.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:31 pm to RFK
quote:
In a way, only the South fought for slavery.
So, somehow, even though neither side wanted to end slavery, it still ended? Was it magic?
Popular
Back to top


2






