re: Was the "animals" meme the most dishonest media moment of the Trump presidency?

quote:

---

What have I lied about? Be specific please.

---

Ahh. The next gambit to keep off the OP subject.

What's this? Like gambit #5? 6?

quote:

---

Wow, you’re really on tilt at this point aren’t you?

---

Hey everyone. Watch the guy who has been in the thread for 18 pages accuse the other guy whose been in the thread for 18 pages of being over zealous!

quote:

---

Youre just calling me a liar

---

You are

quote:

---

but i‘m the one who can’t have an open and honest conversation?

---

It took you 15 pages to finally answer a question honestly that you could have answered with your first response.

Had you done so, blammo, problem solved.

quote:

---

Was the "animals" meme the most dishonest media moment of the Trump presidency?

---

No.

Trump/Russia is by far the most dishonest media moment of the Trump Presidency and it still has not stopped.

They literally pushed and still are pushing a conspiracy theory based on a bullshite dossier that was in the words of James Comey, "Salacious and unverified" to explain the anointed Hillary Clinton losing an election she was supposed to win.

quote:

---

Trump/Russia is by far the most dishonest media moment of the Trump Presidency and it still has not stopped.

---

You're the 2nd in here on this one and I tend to agree.

As bad as this one was, I tend to rank them

1. Russia can find Hillary email
2. They're rapists
3. Some immigrants are animals

That said. This last one is the most disgusting example in my view

quote:

---

I’m not avoiding anything nor trying to change the subject. Let’s talk about the OP. What part of it would you like to discuss?

---

We already covered it.

Hence, why I had stopped posting.

You already admitted I was right.

So, I don't really know your point.

Okay so did I address it or am I trying to change to subject?

Are we not allowed to talk about anything other than the OP in any and all threads? Help me out here.

quote:

---

Okay so did I address it or am I trying to change to subject?

---

I'm reasonably certain that when you did, I said you did.

Of course, like 2 posts later, you wanted to get everyone off the subject again.

quote:

---

Are we not allowed to talk about anything other than the OP in any and all threads?

---

What's the point of having unrelated subjects brought up in the OP thread?

I don't go into abortion threads and talk about taxes.

quote:

---

So I’m saying now let’s talk more about the OP.

---

What's left to talk about?

It was an egregious example of an ongoing problem with the media being basically an arm of the DNC and running as a front for them. That's been covered.

quote:

---

But now you don’t want to?

---

If you have anything to add to that, I suppose we can cover it. To be sure, there's more breadth to it. But frankly, if you intend to spend 15 more pages NOT giving an answer you know to be true on something again, then nah, I'm good.

quote:

---

Talking about how this board handles its discussion about the media is relevant in a thread about the media

---

Only if your goal is to try and equate it to what happened when there is no equivalence to be provided as the past ~20 pages have shown.

quote:

---

I linked you to an entire book on it.

---

Coordination. I realize you think you're going to draw me into your subject shite, but, sorry, nope.

quote:

---

It costs less than $10 and I am even offering to send you my copy when SFP is done with it.

---

I don't need a copy of something that is unlike what happened in the OP. Sorry.

Given that we've already had THIS discussion, at this point, I can only assume you're just posting to generate responses.

quote:

---

How do you know what the book details is unlike what happened in the OP?

---

Because you described what you believe it proves.

You didn't lie did you? Cause I trusted you!