- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Voter fraud in Georgia is a fact. Watch and you decide.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:23 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:23 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Slickly Cumswill is a joke and commie scum. So there’s that. Carry on
0
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:28 pm to lake chuck fan
No idea how that fat arse Ruby freeman is still breathing
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:39 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
quote: There's not a reasonable explanation for people wearing gloves and masks and taking pictures of piles of ballots going into the ballot box, then taking their gloves off.
Covid - people handling ballots and touching a drop box out in the open that has been touched by tons of people.
People take pictures of themselves voting all the time. Look on twitter around election time. A family member dropping off the entire family's ballots may take a pic to show his family he dropped them off.
Were they wearing the gloves when they collected all those ballots?
So, family members that trusted other family members to collect their ballots didn't trust them enough to drop them off & required a picture as proof? How would those family members even know those were the same ballots that were given to the designated "dropper"? Trust. Without pictures.
Explain the absence of required monitoring of each dropbox, and/or the destruction of surveillance video.
Explain the dropping off of multiple ballots in jurisdictions where harvesting was illegal.
Explain how those ballots are not illegal.
Explain the legality of the multitude of blatant chain of custody violations with dropbox ballots.
Explain.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:48 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:Oh ffs
Mickey Goldmill
I was happy when I believed this guy was in never neverland playing backgammon with Rex somewhere.
I guess thats what election season does for Political talk.
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 10:50 pm
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:56 pm to tenderfoot tigah
quote:
It's all on camera in the movie 2000 Mules. It blows my mind that there are still people who haven't watched the movie.
It blows my mind that the slime that made 2000 mules have never released the backup data to show where and how that peep show was filmed.
Do you think they should have to put up the data- or admit it was a certified fraud?
Posted on 8/16/23 at 11:02 pm to texridder
quote:
It blows my mind that the slime that made 2000 mules have never released the backup data to show where and how that peep show was filmed.
Do you think they should have to put up the data- or admit it was a certified fraud?
Was told 2000 Mules has already been "debunked." So roll with the debunking as-is and as Hillary would say "At this point what difference does it make?"
Posted on 8/16/23 at 11:15 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Was told 2000 Mules has already been "debunked."
It absolutely has, but you Trumpovites still bring it up once a week as proving the South shall rise again..
Posted on 8/17/23 at 1:20 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Phillips responded via email that “the movie graphics are not literal interpretations of our data.”
Right. It's a movie. It's not a court presentation.
quote:
I'll also add this interesting story:
That story isn't interesting at all. That story, published July 13, 2023, is old news.
The subpoenas were issued well over a year ago.
quote:
Georgia is actually trying to investigate the claims made by 2000 Mules, but they won't provide the evidence to help with the investigation. That's odd, isn't it.
The evidence they're seeking to obtain is the name(s) of whistleblower(s) that were promised anonymity by TTV.
As the article correctly states their reasoning for not divulging those names: "because doing so may put those persons in physical or personal jeopardy."
There's nothing "odd" about it at all. Especially given the questionable & contradictory actions by the GBI, SEB, & SoS by omitting and/or leaking confidential information during the entire process.
You can't continue to allow people suspected or accused of wrongdoing investigate & police themselves.
What I find to be odd is that in virtually every instance, no matter what jurisdiction, the citizens seeking answers are painted as being the actual criminals.
In closing...GFY
Posted on 8/17/23 at 1:25 am to 2020_reVISION
Don’t let them frustrate you so.
Patriots in Control. NCSWIC
Patriots in Control. NCSWIC
Posted on 8/17/23 at 1:48 am to texridder
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/21/23 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 8/17/23 at 1:56 am to TheRoarRestoredInBR
quote:
Don’t let them frustrate you so.
Goldshill can't frustrate truth with partial truths.
And I'm always smiling when I type "GFY".
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:24 am to lake chuck fan
Too long... too boring... didn't follow.
Fox took a giant step toward relevancy by firing tuck.
Fox took a giant step toward relevancy by firing tuck.
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:40 am to texridder
quote:
quote:
Was told 2000 Mules has already been "debunked."
It absolutely has
Then you should absolutely cite this grand debunking of which you speak.
The outliers and oddities of the '20 election compel a nation whose government derives its power from the consent (think election integrity) of the governed to ensure election fidelity.
Why are some afraid of what they'll find out?
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:01 am to 2020_reVISION
quote:
Right. It's a movie. It's not a court presentation.
Then people should stop citing it as fact
quote:
The evidence they're seeking to obtain is the name(s) of whistleblower(s) that were promised anonymity by TTV.
As the article correctly states their reasoning for not divulging those names: "because doing so may put those persons in physical or personal jeopardy."
There's nothing "odd" about it at all. Especially given the questionable & contradictory actions by the GBI, SEB, & SoS by omitting and/or leaking confidential information during the entire process.
You can't continue to allow people suspected or accused of wrongdoing investigate & police themselves.
What I find to be odd is that in virtually every instance, no matter what jurisdiction, the citizens seeking answers are painted as being the actual criminals.
Republicans in Georgia are actively trying to investigate the claims made by the creators of the movie regarding voting fraud. They are obviously not cooperating.
I'm not sure what more you guys want here. You finally have a government agency taking the fraud claims seriously and trying to investigate yet this group won't help them. If you really want the truth, back up the claims being made. Rudy, Sidney Powell, 2000 Mules creators....all made outlandish claims and when asked to provide their evidence, all crawfished.
quote:
In closing...GFY
Classy
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:19 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Republicans in Georgia are actively trying to investigate the claims made by the creators of the movie regarding voting fraud.
Why do they need others to do the heavy lifting? Get off their lazy backsides and do it themselves.
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:23 am to TigerB8
quote:
The movie has video footage of laws being broken, but that's a joke to you?
The quicker people like you learn that “they” do not give a frick, the quicker we can right this ship
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:44 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
Why do they need others to do the heavy lifting? Get off their lazy backsides and do it themselves.
The 2000 Mules creators claim to have witnesses to fraud, but refuse to name them. How can the state handle that themselves? If they Mules creators really have the truth and want it proven, wouldn't they cooperate or release that info? Sounds like they made outlandish claims that were either partially distorted or completely made up which cannot prove now that they are being called to do so.
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:49 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:I guarantee he never watched it.
That movie, and the basis behind it, is a joke
Posted on 8/17/23 at 12:29 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The 2000 Mules creators claim to have witnesses to fraud, but refuse to name them. How can the state handle that themselves? If they Mules creators really have the truth and want it proven, wouldn't they cooperate or release that info? Sounds like they made outlandish claims that were either partially distorted or completely made up which cannot prove now that they are being called to do so.
Are they incapable of doing their own research? Are there 2K mules stopping them?
Posted on 8/17/23 at 4:00 pm to lake chuck fan
HHTM did you watch? Why do you think Kemp keeps denying it?
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News