- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Video of the shooter for those that haven’t seen it
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:25 am to tigerskin
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:25 am to tigerskin
Fantastic news komrades. Since it's justifiable to shoot an unarmed individual breaking an entering, I will just skip the center mass and make a canoe in the middle of their grape.
In fact, everyone needs to bookmark this very thread for the Tweet and everyone supporting shooting of unarmed people break an entry. FINALLY, something we all agree upon, right proggies??
In fact, everyone needs to bookmark this very thread for the Tweet and everyone supporting shooting of unarmed people break an entry. FINALLY, something we all agree upon, right proggies??
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:25 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
TDsngumbo
Why are you “done with Trump”? Fan of the swamp?
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:26 am to SBC
quote:
Why not fire a warning shot at the bench?
It sounded pretty loud in there. A lot of yelling, people trying to break things, and she was already coming through the window.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:28 am to pvilleguru
A gunshot in a narrow hallway could easily be heard. I mean...everyone stopped what they were doing when they heard the shot that hit her.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:28 am to SBC
The Secret Service and other members of DHS LE are prohibited from giving a warning shot by directive.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:28 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Because they tend to not do those things when protecting government officials during a riot.
But but, she was unarmed and 100 lbs...what harm could she have done?!?! They need to start shooting people in the leg.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:29 am to SEC. 593
quote:
The Secret Service and other members of DHS LE are prohibited from giving a warning shot by directive.
Are they also prohibited from detaining individuals or are they supposed to shoot to kill?
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:30 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
And after months and months of violent riots where officers were attacked directly and many people were murdered at the hands or rioters, we finally had live rounds fired...at an unarmed woman. And no one in media is questioning the officer’s conduct. Makes perfect sense...
As a former proggy, I've been telling you all here for years:
THEY WANT YOU DEAD.
The sooner you understand this, everything else will all make sense.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:30 am to LEASTBAY
quote:Obviously no one really knows.
Is coming through that window in a fed building a reason for a justified shooting of the individual? Is this a Federal law bc of the building? Anyone know? Just curious.
But I think a solid guess is that they were under orders that no one was to get pass that door and to be deal with by any means necessary if they tried to. I imagine that could have been some final point where they simply refused to let anyone get closer to some spot they deemed off limits to the protestors.
Just a complete guess, but based on this video, it seems more and more like it could be something along those lines.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:31 am to RollTide1987
I think people would be surprised by the rules of engagement for the Secret Service while protecting a Primary.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:32 am to tigerskin
I heard one report that the shooter was private security.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:33 am to Tiguar
quote:
The inaction by police for the 30 minutes leading up to this is truly bizarre
That’s kind of what is confusing. Some were aggressive then others were chatting it up with the protestors.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:33 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Are they also prohibited from detaining individuals or are they supposed to shoot to kill?
Probably depends on the situation. If they shoot, it's for center mass. They can probably detain if there isn't a risk of being overrun.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:33 am to SEC. 593
quote:
I think people would be surprised by the rules of engagement for the Secret Service while protecting a Primary.
You are assuming that is what they are doing. I highly doubt Vice-President Pence was in that room or down that hall. Just about every member of Congress was escorted to the basement and sealed inside. I'm pretty sure Pence would have been down there with them.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:34 am to shel311
quote:
But I think a solid guess is that they were under orders that no one was to get pass that door and to be deal with by any means necessary if they tried to. I imagine that could have been some final point where they simply refused to let anyone get closer to some spot they deemed off limits to the protestors.
Just a complete guess, but based on this video, it seems more and more like it could be something along those lines.
This seems like a decent possibility. But if that was the case, I feel like they would have had a bigger visible presence at that spot. That would be my strategy anyway.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:34 am to tigerskin
The shooting was completely uncalled for....that being said, isn't this usually where you folks would post something about stupid games...if it were a liberal, of course?
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:35 am to SBC
quote:These dudes don't shoot warning shots. I'd almost wonder if it's against their policy to even shoot a warning shot.
Why not fire a warning shot at the bench?
This is sounding a lot like the "shoot him in the leg, don't kill him" arguments at this point.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:36 am to cwill
quote:
.that being said, isn't this usually where you folks would post something about stupid games...if it were a liberal, of course?
I posted it about her FWIW. Won't hold my breath for the media, or the uniparty members of government for that matter, to have the slightest bit of consistency though.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:36 am to jamboybarry
quote:
That’s a much different take than the previous video. She was legit trying to jump through that window
Yeah. They surely could have taken her down and arrested her, but that probably would have left them vulnerable. Sucks that he got her in the neck and she had to suffer like that.
The leftwing media would be up in arms about this if she were BLM or antifa.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:37 am to tigerskin
The people saying this was a justified shooting are the same people who cheered that couple getting arrested for simply standing in their own yard with guns
Popular
Back to top



0





