Started By
Message

re: Vice is rational: forgive student loans; don't give Amazon money

Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:34 pm to
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19821 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

How do these people not understand the difference between a tax break and giving entities money

Because leftists believe all money to be inherently property of the state. By not taking money from taxpayers, you are essentially stealing the state's resources.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20515 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:37 pm to
Neither is a great option.

The only way I would consider a student loan forgiveness option is if it were tied to the government getting completely out of financial aid (except for plans where if you go into the military we will pay for college after so many years).
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476358 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:39 pm to
let me also be clear

forgiving student loans and NOT qualifying that forgiveness as income would be irrationally unfair
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

How do these people not understand the difference between a tax break and giving entities money


Not voicing my opinion on the deals, but Amazon is getting more than tax breaks. They are getting credits. So let’s at least start with that reality.
This post was edited on 11/18/18 at 5:42 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476358 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:44 pm to
so we're clear, i don't support these tax packages on a philosophical level

but in terms of reality, states/localities keep offering them so to keep pace you have to just offer the best, bad deal you can or you're totally left out

sometimes it can be very beneficial for everyone (see: the economic engine of LA, SWLA)

sometimes, it can be horrible (see: our film tax credits)
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

so we're clear, i don't support these tax packages on a philosophical level


Oh I get your point. It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t thing. It’s complicated.

I’m just responding the typical diarrhea spouted about liberals not understanding math. The poster I responded to doesn’t understand this deal, clearly
This post was edited on 11/18/18 at 5:55 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476358 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

I’m just responding the typical diarrhea spouted about liberals not understanding math.

these particular ones don't

they also don't understand the difference in wealth and income, as well as the difference in real wealth and paper wealth
Posted by gobuxgo5
Member since Nov 2012
10343 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:51 pm to
People get more offended about the peasant getting relief than trillion dollar bailouts to corporations and bank.

My fellow conservatives more annoyed about a 12k loan forgiven than 400 million in foreign aid going to 1 of the dozens of countries who hate us.

People more offended we let our officials pay more in interest to China then everything else combined because we can’t spend properly
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33864 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:01 pm to
thats the scalability of objective/subjective point of view

The average American really cant wrap his or her brain around half a Trillion dollars, but they sure as shite can relate to Bob my neighbor getting a waiver on a $20k due
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476358 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:05 pm to
speaking of scalability, how would we even uniformly forgive loans?

so the guy with $20k gets the same benefit as the guy with $200k?
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40853 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

How do these people not understand the difference between a tax break and giving entities money


It is more than that. Certain companies shouldn't get deals over other entities. So even if they got the logic wrong, they are still correct.

Either lower the tax burden for everyone or don't. Targeted deals for connected entities is BS.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
20054 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:07 pm to
Tax subsidies are unconstitional cronyism. Why should one company get something no other business gets.

Forgiving college loans will be the equivalent of devaluing the dollar by however many trillion is owed....no different than printing money and handing it out. Plus ...not very fair to those that actually paid the debt or paid for college.

Neither of these should be done.
This post was edited on 11/18/18 at 6:08 pm
Posted by TimeOutdoors
LA
Member since Sep 2014
13423 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:17 pm to
Why should student loans be forgiven? How about car loans? Mortgage? Just payback the loan like you agreed to and move on. Enough already about student loan forgiveness.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33864 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

speaking of scalability, how would we even uniformly forgive loans?


I assume you go to the same uninformed political actors from death boards used for socialized heath care to determine value and worth towards the collective in order to prioritize whose debt is forgiven
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
15735 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:26 pm to
Is pretty straightforward, it is the only remedy available to those who have been defrauded. Don't blame those seeking forgiveness. Some private, for profits have made off like bandits with the Education Department being culpable given its statutory/regulatory authority. Blame the student, fine, but that doesn't release the business nor the government from its responsibilities. Yes, courts have likewise waded in as a course of recourse.

Amount forgiven is considered income.

Student loans have typically been considered off limits via bankruptcy.
This post was edited on 11/18/18 at 6:33 pm
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33864 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Is pretty straightforward, it is the only remedy available to those who have been defrauded.


Exactly what part of this is "fraud" ??
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
15735 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:38 pm to
The schools themselves under scrutiny used fraudulent means to enroll students, is pretty straightforward. Google can address specifics....Al Collins college Program Performance Review, operated by Career Education Corporation...trades on the stock market. The college I am familiar with was cited by the ED for 18 "serious" Title IV violations....it is your money they are stealing

Want to hold individuals, government entities accountable, fine, apply the same expectations to a business, in this case, colleges for profit
This post was edited on 11/18/18 at 6:44 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80782 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Student loan debt is going to manifest itself as an issue in untold ways. The societal cost of all the Millennials not being able to buy homes and start families might be so great some sort of populist measure might be smart. I have never seen a socialist program that works, so don't think I'm suggesting it, especially not something designed by the Democrats, but it's definitely food for thought. I will agree with Democrats that we shouldn't have privatized student loans. It created a monster.



If one state does it, they might attract a lot of new college graduates. Then (theoretically) businesses would follow - you would not only have an educated workforce, but also one that makes lower salary demands than they otherwise would.

Not saying it's what they should do, just spitballing as far as the rationale.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33864 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

used fraudulent means to enroll students, is pretty straightforward.

then your issue is with that institution and would be remedied in a court of law

I still fail to see why the Federal Government should be involved in forgiving any loans, unless the Federal Government was complicit in the act of fraud


quote:

it is your money they are stealing

sounds like its the student's money who threw it down a educational ponzi scheme. When I took a loan out to subsidize my education, yes it was the government's money, but I signed for it, and I had to accept responsibility of repayment.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Is pretty straightforward, it is the only remedy available to those who have been defrauded.


Diploma Mills aren’t the problem. They’re insignificant.

Legitimate universities are the problem.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram