Started By
Message

re: Very real chance Roe v Wade is overturned soon

Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:09 pm to
quote:


Great... more unwanted kids that we'll have to financially support. Really thinking this through.
At least these will be American kids speaking English (one form or another anyway).
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13551 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Nope, plan b doesn’t result in the killing of the innocent and defenseless. Why would I be?

Okay so where do you draw the line then?
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13551 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Do you believe abortion should generally be restricted once a heartbeat has been detected?”, you will get a much higher number than 18%.

Well yeah that’s because it’s a manipulative and leading poll question. What is the average tile from conception to a heartbeat? Do we know this?
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17781 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

No you fricking idiot, I referenced my education because it is super rare for foster kids to get a higher education. Way to ignore the whole point, you virtue signaling twat.


So you were obviously an unwanted baby. Hence being given up for adoption. You have accomplished a lot, and have contributed greatly to society. What if your mom had chosen abortion instead of adoption. This world would undoubtedly be less without you.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17781 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Okay so where do you draw the line then?


quote:

the killing of the innocent and defenseless.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13551 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Your actions will always confirm that you don’t believe what you say;

It’s an interesting point. Conservatives love to lay on the hyperbole when it comes to abortion. Murder, extermination, infanticide. If they really truly believed this why the frick aren’t they doing something about it besides complaining?
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13551 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

the killing of the innocent and defenseless.

That isn’t a policy. What timeline or biological development do you draw the line?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:16 pm to
I mean, Roe v Wade has lived longer than Hitler did and has “killed” almost 10x as many people as Hitler, so yeah, you’d think that these baws would do more than post on message boards about it.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74132 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:


It’s an interesting point. Conservatives love to lay on the hyperbole when it comes to abortion. Murder, extermination, infanticide. If they really truly believed this why the frick aren’t they doing something about it besides complaining?



This rebuttal can be used against dems on numerous issues.

Healthcare, climate change, police brutality, etc.

Why aren’t you asking dems why they aren’t invading China and India to stop emissions? We only have 10 years left
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 2:18 pm
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
15734 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:17 pm to
No he won't. Have seen his true colors, Obamacare
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13551 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Why aren’t you asking dems why they aren’t invading China and India to stop emissions? We only have 10 years left

I’ve made this exact argument on here plenty of times
Posted by mattgr1983
Austin, Tx
Member since Oct 2012
2434 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

It is a valid point and shows the inconsistency of the right.

They want all these babies born but do t want to do a damn thing to help them afterward.

No abortion but cut welfare and other child services too.



Ding ding ding.

No abortion.
No funding for birth control.
Cut social services for foster children.

Why don't they just come out and say what they really want? No sex for poor people.
Posted by mattgr1983
Austin, Tx
Member since Oct 2012
2434 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Exactly. This is a human life we are talking about. Maybe instead of killing babies we should take that away as an out and focus on a stronger family culture/structure.



How about because family structure isn't something you legislate? This is a political board, correct?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

This rebuttal can be used against dems on numerous issues.

Healthcare, climate change, police brutality, etc.
All topics where most of what you hear is virtue signaling by people who can’t possibly believe the things they say.

I think you’re onto something.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74132 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:26 pm to
You guys are making the absurd argument that you can only engage in helping children by supporting govt initiatives.

You guys completely ignore private, charitable, religious, etc organizations.

Under your insane logic, somebody who has opened hundreds of homes for children, raised hundreds of millions of dollars, started numerous campaigns, etc is against helping children if they oppose government involvement.

It’s a non-sequiter

Most dems do not engage in any charity. They don’t donate money or time.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Muleriderhog
NYC
Member since Jan 2015
3116 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

So you were obviously an unwanted baby. Hence being given up for adoption. You have accomplished a lot, and have contributed greatly to society. What if your mom had chosen abortion instead of adoption. This world would undoubtedly be less without you. 




Like I said earlier, I'd never advocate for someone to get an abortion but a women has that right. Also, yeah I was put up for adoption at about 1 year old, except I never got adopted and had to grow up in foster care and foster care sucks arse. The only reason I amounted to shite was I got lucky with my foster home i got placed in at 16. Forcing mothers to have kids they dont want is not a good thing and its not good for the kid either.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62601 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

How about because family structure isn't something you legislate?
But we do. We pay women to be single mothers. We pay them more for each kid
Posted by MAGA
Member since Sep 2016
623 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

You mean the birth control republicans dont want insurance to pay for????


You lie.

Cuck.
Posted by Jake_LaMotta
Coral Gables
Member since Sep 2017
5700 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24796 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

It's not getting overturned



Brilliant judicial insight there.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram