Started By
Message
locked post

Uranium One Informant's Testimony Gives No Evidence Clinton Benefited from uranium sale

Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:01 pm
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14214 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:01 pm
quote:

An informant whom House Republicans have said could reveal a link between a 2010 sale of U.S. uranium supplies and donations to the Clinton Foundation provided no evidence of that during a four-hour interview with congressional staff last month.
quote:

The informant, lobbyist William D. Campbell, “provided no evidence of a quid pro quo involving Secretary (Hillary) Clinton or the Clinton Foundation and no evidence that Secretary Clinton was involved in, or improperly influenced” the uranium sale, the Democrats said in a five-page summary of the Feb. 7 interview.

Democrats said they were releasing a summary of the session because majority Republicans, who control the panels involved, refused to approve the preparation of a full transcript.
quote:

Campbell was interviewed by Republican and Democratic staffers from the House Oversight and Intelligence committees and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Reuters
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78103 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:01 pm to
"please clap"
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50545 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Democrats said
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

the Democrats said




of course they did
Posted by Usafgiles
North Augusta, SC
Member since Oct 2009
1904 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:02 pm to
you are about to trigger some fools.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

the Democrats said in a five-page summary of the Feb. 7 interview.

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69313 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:03 pm to
So now we trust partisan memos?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118854 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:04 pm to
Hillary is innocent!!!!
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79733 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Democrats said they were releasing a summary of the session because majority Republicans, who control the panels involved, refused to approve the preparation of a full transcript.


Muh minority memo.

Getting out in front this time rather than have to figure out a “rebuttal”. Nobody ever accused them of being slow learners.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99120 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:06 pm to
His name was Seth Rich.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

e, the Democrats said in


I don't know who is more pathetic OP or masterbaked.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32874 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:08 pm to
I don’t understand why the left feels so obligated to defend Hillary, she’s a private citizen now.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:09 pm to
If no evidence is the standard, why are we pissing away the treasury on muh russians?
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:09 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 2:24 pm
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28340 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:10 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 10:45 am
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand


Modern American leftism is zealotry....religion.


Clinton is their pope.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14214 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

So now we trust partisan memos?

Campbell was a Republican-called witness. Yet, the Republicans majority refused to approve the preparation of a transcript of the hearing.

If Campbell had the evidence his lawyer said he had on Hillary, do you think the Republicans would have released the transcript?

You can bet your Super Bowl tickets on it.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:16 pm to
Of course there was no quid pro quo.

This whole Uranium One "scandal" is nothing more than Sean Hannity's wet dream.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

His name was Seth Rich.

What did Seth Rich have to do with the Uranium One deal?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73851 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:17 pm to
Still with her forever and always - Rex
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram