- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE IN OP: Giuliani WILL NOT Defend Impeachment:
Posted on 1/17/21 at 10:57 am to LSUBALLER
Posted on 1/17/21 at 10:57 am to LSUBALLER
quote:
One of the stupidest things you have ever posted here and that’s saying a lot. Rudy not working for money. You are a joke.
Which is why he can only get Rudy to do it. Every other attorney would want to be paid, and they know they never would be.
0
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:00 am to JudgeHolden
Can't wait to see how he fricks this up.
When Bolton calls you out as a frickup and is right. Then you know you lost your touch.
When Bolton calls you out as a frickup and is right. Then you know you lost your touch.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:04 am to burke985
It's not happening, you fell for a grifter.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:12 am to JudgeHolden
Easy case.
Congress has no impeachment jurisdiction over a private citizen.
Dismissed.
Congress has no impeachment jurisdiction over a private citizen.
Dismissed.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:32 am to JudgeHolden
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Literally anyone could defend this impeachment.
So it’s telling that Rudy is the worst possible choice, isn’t it.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:47 am to JudgeHolden
Either way, where is it codified a former president can be removed from an office he no longer holds?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:49 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Either way, where is it codified a former president can be removed from an office he no longer holds?
The Constitution does not say one way or the other.
My recollection is that impeachments have occurred after someone left office. Remember that impeachment isn’t only the President.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:49 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Republican strategist Karl Rove suggested on Sunday that President Trump is at higher risk of the Senate voting to convict him in his second impeachment trial if his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani spearheads his defense.
So, IOW, it's a slam dunk for acquittal.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:50 am to JudgeHolden
On behalf of the Democratic Party, I’d like to thank Rudy Giuliani for all that he’s done.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 11:52 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
There's still the confirmation of the impeachment articles but the senate still has to confirm.
So this is going for the disqualify route. Is it really hard to understand this stuff?
quote:
According to the Constitution, the only penalties allowed to be imposed by the Senate are removal from office and disqualification from holding any federal office in the future.
So this is going for the disqualify route. Is it really hard to understand this stuff?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 12:20 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
I despise rove more than diblasio even
Posted on 1/17/21 at 12:30 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
UPDATE: Karl Rove says this makes conviction MORE likely.
Did he have the whiteboard out while saying this
Posted on 1/17/21 at 12:31 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
I rest my case
The problem with that matrix is it conflates legitimate irregularities with ones that kill credibility.
For example, the poll watcher abuse: 600k votes in PA. You’re never going to convince anyone to throw out that many votes because a poll watcher was not within 6 feet.
But there are legitimate ones where absentee was allowed despite state laws prohibiting it.
Conflating those dilutes the message.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 1/17/21 at 12:52 pm to JudgeHolden
Rove is part of the evil
Posted on 1/17/21 at 1:01 pm to JudgeHolden
There's a documentary out on the NY Mafia that's worth watching. Giuliani lead the successful effort.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 1:09 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
So, IOW, it's a slam dunk for acquittal.
And Jeb Bush will be the 2024 leading candidate.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 1:12 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
So it’s telling that Rudy is the worst possible choice, isn’t it.
I'd be happy to have him defend me.
Posted on 1/18/21 at 10:23 am to JudgeHolden
Interesting. I’m not sure this rule applies if he is not going to testify.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News