- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
UPDATE IN OP: Giuliani WILL NOT Defend Impeachment:
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:44 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:44 am
First he was going to.
ABC
UPDATE: Karl Rove says this makes conviction MORE likely.
The Hill
NOW RUDY SAYS HE CANNOT BECAUSE HE IS A FACT WITNESS.
Business Insider
quote:
President Donald Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani tells ABC News he's working as part of the president's defense team in his upcoming second impeachment trial -- and that he's prepared to argue that the president's claims of widespread voter fraud did not constitute incitement to violence because the widely-debunked claims are true.
ABC
quote:
"I'm involved right now … that's what I'm working on," Giuliani told ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl. A few hours later, Giuliani -- who led the president's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results -- was spotted at the White House.
UPDATE: Karl Rove says this makes conviction MORE likely.
quote:
Republican strategist Karl Rove suggested on Sunday that President Trump is at higher risk of the Senate voting to convict him in his second impeachment trial if his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani spearheads his defense.
The Hill
NOW RUDY SAYS HE CANNOT BECAUSE HE IS A FACT WITNESS.
quote:
Rudy Giuliani now says he won't be a part of President Donald Trump's impeachment defense team. Calling himself a "witness," the president's personal attorney told ABC News' chief White House correspondent, Jonathan Karl, that he could not defend Trump against the charge of inciting an insurrection because he attended — and spoke at — the event at the center of the allegation.
Business Insider
This post was edited on 1/18/21 at 10:24 am
30
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:44 am to JudgeHolden
Yikes
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:45 am to JudgeHolden
But I thought trump wasn’t paying Rudy’s bills? 
frick the MSM
frick the MSM
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:46 am to JudgeHolden
Grifter
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:47 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
But I thought trump wasn’t paying Rudy’s bills?
Giuliani ain’t doing it for the money.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:47 am to JudgeHolden
Exhibit A
I rest my case
I rest my case
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:48 am to arseinclarse
Lack of foundation, baw.
Is that supposed to be a 1006?
Is that supposed to be a 1006?
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 7:49 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:48 am to JudgeHolden
This is a horrible decision by Trump. Rudy has clearly shown himself to have lost a lot off his fastball. There is no telling what he will say. This has a much higher chance of hurting rather than helping trump.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:50 am to LSU2ALA
quote:
This is a horrible decision by Trump.
Well. Who else will do it?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:50 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Is that supposed to be a 1006?
Yes. Taken from the 3 reports.
Your objection is overruled.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:50 am to JudgeHolden
How can he be impeached after he leaves office.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:51 am to arseinclarse
quote:
Yes. Taken from the 3 reports.
What reports? You ain’t there yet, baw.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:52 am to LetsgoGamecocks
quote:
How can he be impeached after he leaves office.
That’s the constitutional question. The Senate will decide it, and SCOTUS will affirm it 7-2 in a plurality decision in which 3 say it’s a political question.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:53 am to JudgeHolden
This is where the Kracken will be released, dims played right into it why you think Trump has been so quiet
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:54 am to JudgeHolden
I don't see how this is even Constitutional. How can you retroactively remove someone from office after a new administration has moved into the White House? If he's found guilty, can his conviction be appealed to the Supreme Court?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:56 am to burke985
quote:
Trump has been so quiet
Well. It won’t be quiet if Rudy is involved. It’s just that no one takes him seriously. And he has zero stroke in the Senate.
He will also likely be indicted by that time by DC (even if he’s pardoned).
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:57 am to RollTide1987
quote:
How can you retroactively remove someone from office after a new administration has moved into the White House?
You aren’t. You are banning them from further office in the future.
quote:
If he's found guilty, can his conviction be appealed to the Supreme Court?
Eventually yes.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 7:58 am to JudgeHolden
To be clear, Trump will be defended in impeachment by a lawyer he pardoned.
Not the best optics.
Not the best optics.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 7:59 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:00 am to LSU2ALA
Just please don’t make that blonde chick from Michigan a key witness. Made some terrible decisions first time around.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:00 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Well. Who else will do it?
I don’t disagree.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News