- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:33 pm to Auburn80
quote:
There are a lot of theological discussions on the gay issue that are beyond my scope (ex: how accurately was the Bible translated), but we have a church that openly accepts divorced people and divorced clergy, so I don’t know how we exclude gay people.
It's a problem of living unrepentantly in sin.
Someone who has gotten a divorce for reasons other than Biblical reasons can repent of their sin and strive to do better even if they cannot reconcile the marriage they've ended. Even if you reject all of that, the Christian Church does not celebrate divorce and I've never met a pastor who would counsel someone toward divorce.
The similar situation for a gay person is to repent of their homosexual ways and strive to do better, which means end what they're doing. To celebrate gay marriage is the antithesis of a Christian way to handle this. Pastors marrying gay couples are committing sin by celebrating sin.
You are comparing two situations that aren't even close to similar.
ETA: I misspelled counsel.
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 8:58 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:35 pm to Rammin TX
quote:
And that is why I was an Episcopalian, the church split and am now a proud Anglican.
And that is why I don’t attend an organized church. I read my bible weekly. I pray daily. I try to keep the commandments. I give to charity and help the needy.
But I don’t need someone to stand on stage and tell me how I am supposed to act. It’s all right there in the Bible (and in my upbringing).
I believe that my charity goes farther when the majority of it is not for a pastors salary and a big expensive building.
Do more for those who need it.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:36 pm to adp
quote:
I'm a pro gay, pro divorce, pro female reverends, pro doing shite on Sunday, pro alcohol, pro cussing.
Good for you. Have you read?
For I know you by your works.
Revelation, Chapter 2.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:36 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
There are large factions of the UMC that seemingly view homosexuality as a virtue and see nothing whatsoever wrong with the lifestyle.
UMC clergy have been infiltrated by leftists. The vast majority of the UMC members are conservative. This may not go the the leftists think it will.
If my little church in NC votes with the leftists, I will be stunned. If they do, I will find a church that sticks to the Word.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:38 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
And that is why I don’t attend an organized church. I read my bible weekly. I pray daily. I try to keep the commandments. I give to charity and help the needy. But I don’t need someone to stand on stage and tell me how I am supposed to act. It’s all right there in the Bible (and in my upbringing).
When was the last time you took communion? When Jesus asks you why you decided that was optional, what are you going to tell him?
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:39 pm to mtntiger
quote:
UMC clergy have been infiltrated by leftists. The vast majority of the UMC members are conservative. This may not go the the leftists think it will.
If my little church in NC votes with the leftists, I will be stunned. If they do, I will find a church that sticks to the Word.
Thank you, brother.
We stand together, on the rock.
The fool builds his house on sand
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:42 pm to Boatshoes
It is not necessary to "take communion" or "give confession" to a priest.
Please point to the verse in which such things are required for paradise.
Please point to the verse in which such things are required for paradise.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:46 pm to mtntiger
How do you find out how the church you attend voted . My wife is a Methodist , I am not but we just tithed to a particular church (last time for that ). I would like to see how they voted .
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:46 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Alternate headline: post-Protestant heretics continue forming own civic religion of virtue signaling and moralistic therapeutic deism.
Pretermitting the discussion of whether homosexuality is a sin (and the concomitant question of what sin is), how could one possibly read the Bible and glean from it that including homosexuals in the covenant of marriage is a part of Judeo-Christianity?
Civil unions and "marriages" may very well have their place in civic society and in other religions and faiths, regardless of gender, sex, proclivities, etc.
But what gymnastics does one have to perform to turn the tripartite covenant from the Old Testament, continued on and elucidated brightly in the New Testament, into two men or two women being joined into the procreative covenant with God. From what "first principles" are these people drawing to get to this new orthodoxy?
If you want to start your own syncretistic religion, then go for it. But this BS ain't Christianity, and it sure as hell ain't Methodist (for whatever that may have ever been worth).
This is just more gnostic disease and the redefining of reality and the symbols we use to communicate about it, to further distorted vision of an immanentized eschaton.
For shame.
Pretermitting the discussion of whether homosexuality is a sin (and the concomitant question of what sin is), how could one possibly read the Bible and glean from it that including homosexuals in the covenant of marriage is a part of Judeo-Christianity?
Civil unions and "marriages" may very well have their place in civic society and in other religions and faiths, regardless of gender, sex, proclivities, etc.
But what gymnastics does one have to perform to turn the tripartite covenant from the Old Testament, continued on and elucidated brightly in the New Testament, into two men or two women being joined into the procreative covenant with God. From what "first principles" are these people drawing to get to this new orthodoxy?
If you want to start your own syncretistic religion, then go for it. But this BS ain't Christianity, and it sure as hell ain't Methodist (for whatever that may have ever been worth).
This is just more gnostic disease and the redefining of reality and the symbols we use to communicate about it, to further distorted vision of an immanentized eschaton.
For shame.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:47 pm to Apollyon
quote:
Please point to the verse in which such things are required for paradise.
Who said anything about paradise? But if you want to bring that into the discussion, John 6.
Primarily at this point it is just a question of obedience or disobedience. But is that going to be your answer? “Yeah, Jesus, I know you said to do this in memory of me, but it wasn’t part of the Romans Road so we decided to skip it.”
Good luck with that.
And as far as confession goes, you don’t confess to a priest.
LINK
Think accountability partner if you want to put it in evangelical terms in a very loose way.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:49 pm to Apollyon
I don't get in these mug sligging fights. No one ever wins. Some of you have religious paranoia big time and it shows; some of you need to take a step back from telling people how things should go.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:49 pm to alphaandomega
I hear what u are saying and agree with the premise that you dont need someone telling you how to act and that you dont need to attend church to be saved.
I would just suggest that believers stick together and support each other somehow. It helps others by your example. If that is in church so be it. Maybe it is outside of church somehow. All I know is that there is value in community. Maybe you dont need it. Or maybe not right now. Others might.
I would just suggest that believers stick together and support each other somehow. It helps others by your example. If that is in church so be it. Maybe it is outside of church somehow. All I know is that there is value in community. Maybe you dont need it. Or maybe not right now. Others might.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:50 pm to texashorn
quote:
No wonder the Catholics are embracing and encouraging illegals.
only leftwingers.
you generalizing pretending like everybody is. LOL
plenty churches are in a battle. especially these which allow gay marriage and clergy.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:56 pm to Boatshoes
I am not your enemy.
I am stating the truth. You may talk to the Lord without intercession.
You are saved by grace, not bread. This isn't a mic drop.
Seriously please tell me where in our Holy Bible requires the sacrament of eucharist for paradise?
I am stating the truth. You may talk to the Lord without intercession.
You are saved by grace, not bread. This isn't a mic drop.
Seriously please tell me where in our Holy Bible requires the sacrament of eucharist for paradise?
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:58 pm to adp
There is no mud to sling.
Fall to your knees.
Fall to your knees.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 11:01 pm to rattlebucket
quote:
2 Timothy 4:3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.
Chills.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 11:02 pm to Apollyon
quote:
You are saved by grace, not bread. This isn't a mic drop.
That's not how it is in the Methodist Church (UMC). This is a Methodist thread, so...
Posted on 1/3/20 at 11:02 pm to Eli Goldfinger
I need to find out where my Methodist church stands on this issue. If it is with the new liberal wave that has infested the UMC, I’ll have to find a new church home.
No problem with gay people but I hate that my leaders of the UMC are forcing gay lifestyles on me.
I read the WSJ article - sounds like the liberal UMC keeps the UMC name and us “traditionalist” have to form a new denomination.
What a sad day for Methodist but it has been brewing for some time.
No problem with gay people but I hate that my leaders of the UMC are forcing gay lifestyles on me.
I read the WSJ article - sounds like the liberal UMC keeps the UMC name and us “traditionalist” have to form a new denomination.
What a sad day for Methodist but it has been brewing for some time.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 1/3/20 at 11:04 pm to Auburn80
quote:
There are a lot of theological discussions on the gay issue that are beyond my scope (ex: how accurately was the Bible translated), but we have a church that openly accepts divorced people and divorced clergy, so I don’t know how we exclude gay people. If we are going to be black and white about it, we have to do it in all areas. And for the record, I am Conservative, Christian, and don’t mind gay marriage.
I'm searching in your post for a point relevant to this discussion.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News