- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
UK: Met Police Identifies 4,000 London Child Exploitation Cases for Possible Reopening
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:55 am
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:55 am
quote:
Met Police Identifies 4,000 London Child Exploitation Cases for Possible Reopening
Last updated
7 minutes ago
An audit of 12,000 reports found one in three closed without action by police or prosecutors; these cases now go to the National Crime Agency for review on whether to reopen them. The findings differ from patterns in Rotherham, spanning intrafamilial abuse, online grooming, and in-person offenses that reflect London's diversity. Mayor Sadiq Khan's January 2025 statement to the London Assembly—that police reported no grooming gangs—drew criticism from figures like Susan Hall, who called it gaslighting victims, while Khan's office insists on full transparency and highlights funding for survivor support.
Twitter Link
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:04 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:09 am to cajunangelle
Well, she could be more clear as to how to define what 'someone grooming' is. That would make it more clear.
Spell it the frick out. She should have said what the groups consist of. I don't know exactly what she means. I get that the result is young girls having sex, but young girls have been having sex forever. Spell it out. It's like someone hating Trump for "all the bad things he's done!" then when pressed for what it is, they can't come up with anything except, "you know exactly what he's done. frick you!"
However, that aside, Khan knows exactly what she's talking about and is a giant turd in a punch bowl.
Spell it the frick out. She should have said what the groups consist of. I don't know exactly what she means. I get that the result is young girls having sex, but young girls have been having sex forever. Spell it out. It's like someone hating Trump for "all the bad things he's done!" then when pressed for what it is, they can't come up with anything except, "you know exactly what he's done. frick you!"
However, that aside, Khan knows exactly what she's talking about and is a giant turd in a punch bowl.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:14 am to HubbaBubba
This should get its own thread...
How would the title go?
King breaks his oath? Should he step down?
How would the title go?
King breaks his oath? Should he step down?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:18 am to HubbaBubba
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:24 am to cajunangelle
They cannot protect children because the don’t want to.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:07 am to cajunangelle
Let’s be honest here, the monarchy hasn’t protected a damn thing except themselves.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:25 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
True, The mayor of Londonistan Sadiq Khan is a con that was knighted as sir.
The people of London in backchannel YouTube vids are pissed that King Charles removed the Church wording to include islam.
While the middle class are gutted islam reigns high in society. Many mosques built.
Remember when Khan flew the orange Trump baby balloon?
The people of London in backchannel YouTube vids are pissed that King Charles removed the Church wording to include islam.
While the middle class are gutted islam reigns high in society. Many mosques built.
Remember when Khan flew the orange Trump baby balloon?
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 8:26 am
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:53 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Let’s be honest here, the monarchy hasn’t protected a damn thing except themselves.
Every institution everywhere eventually has one main priority, and that is for the protection and flourishing of that particular institution.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:54 am to cajunangelle
So they are going to arrest the victims now and any member of their families that may speak out?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:02 am to cajunangelle
The only way to save the UK is for the Patriots to rise up and go scotched earth on the entire island, parliament, the useless police and the monarchy...
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:07 am to Penrod
quote:
Every institution everywhere eventually has one main priority, and that is for the protection and flourishing of that particular institution.
Right. It’s still appropriate to point out that the monarchy, which should task itself with protecting the people and the country, is more concerned with giving off the aroma of woke.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:16 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Let’s be honest here, the monarchy hasn’t protected a damn thing except themselves.

Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:16 am to the808bass
Yep. Diversity for globalization.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:57 am to cajunangelle
let their woman get raped
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:13 am to tigersmanager
No London mayor has ever been knighted as sir.
Now its Sir Khan. Charles took the sacks of cash.
Now its Sir Khan. Charles took the sacks of cash.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:50 pm to Penrod
quote:
Every institution everywhere
Well yeah, but this was a thread about the monarchy so…
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:56 pm to cajunangelle
.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:04 pm to cajunangelle
Now do spain...
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 5:48 pm
Back to top


7











