Started By
Message

re: UK crawfishing on sending troops to Ukraine

Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:40 am to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:40 am to
quote:

“The risks are too high and the forces inadequate for such a task,” said a source familiar with the talks. The source told The Times, “This was always the UK’s thought. It was France who wanted a more muscular approach.”

Well yea. 30k troops is a huge portion of the current British Army's combat force. Of course France was more muscular, they actually have a military.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7858 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Send all the Ot warriors instead

Now that DoD is greenlighting trannies again, they’ll need to be sent off there for sure. They’ll fit right in.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21451 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Citing “high risk”


Meaning they’d much rather have American boys spill their blood over there.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27770 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:04 am to
Ah. So then they don’t actually stand with Ukraine.

They stand with Ukraine so long as the US sends its sons, brothers, and fathers in first before theirs.

frick the EU and Britain on Ukraine. We need to walk away in absolute terms and let them deal with it.
Posted by guzziguy
Lake Forest
Member since Jun 2022
993 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Starmer is acknowledging the political reality that there's no public support at home for fighting this war.


I'm surprised he listened.
He must've woke up when reminded that Parliament stated that no males from the Muslim Invasion Force could be drafted to serve.
Sending young British men into that meat grinder would've decimated the future True Brit population.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7930 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

The United Kingdom is pulling back from a plan to deploy thousands of ground troops to Ukraine, citing high risk of Russia nuking London and major cities.

A force of up to 30,000 troops had been discussed for deployment to guard key Ukrainian sites, but that plan is now off the table. “The risks are too high and the forces inadequate for such a task,” said a source familiar with the talks. The source told The Times, “All of our minorities live in the cities, if we lose them, the UK will become nothing but a nation of native English and Welsh, and no one in the government wants that. We would be ok with Russia nuking the rural areas clean of those hobbits, but we don't think Putin will help us there, we know because we asked.”

Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13621 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:13 am to
Honestly, Ukraine doesn’t want British troops, they would like a few billion British pounds though.


Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17614 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:16 am to
It's easy to talk a big game until it's time to step up.

Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1628 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:44 am to
UK crawfishing on sending troops to Ukraine

no kidding..lol.
At some point, the US will cut all ties with Ukraine, and everybody knows it. Nobody wants to be holding that bag of shite when it happens, and it will..
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram