Started By
Message

re: Tucker’s conversion is now complete. He wants Iran to have nukes.

Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:46 am to
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2896 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Why does every talking head that goes solo, go nuts eventually???


because nuts is where the money is.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42231 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:47 am to
quote:

These two, I am now convinced, were never really conservative. I think they went with what they thought was popular, and when they started to show some cracks in their credibility, they both got fired, and it's as if that just made them angry to the point that they lost their minds


Tucker’s ratings were almost enough to make his job security infinite. They must have seen through his bullshite and here we are. In other words…he must be a real POS to get fired.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299017 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:48 am to
quote:


A nuclear weapon should be Iran’s number one national priority.


Exactly.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13206 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:54 am to
The fact that Iran doesn't already have a nuke is a sign to me that they care less about the nuke as a war tool and more as a negotiation tool. It is harder to enrich uranium early in the enrichment process than it is later in the process. They've seemingly had ~60% enriched uranium for years when just a few weeks/months could get them to weapons-grade.

The idea that Iran having a nuke means that Israel is going to be nuclear wasteland doesn't really make much sense given what we know. Israel still outpaces Iran technologically. If the two got in a nuke throwing fight, Iran is going to lose. However, Iran having just one nuke changes their bargaining position greatly. Israel would have to change their ambitions in the region and many of the Muslim nations would probably distance themselves from Israel and some would outright realign themselves with Iran.

That is what is really at stake. Not Tel Aviv irradiated, Tel Aviv no longer being able to dictate the state of play in the region.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44214 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:54 am to
quote:

Lots of low IQ people in here. I can’t imagine watching that and disagreeing with anything he said.


Wait.

You support his comparing India/Pakistan to Israel/Iran?

Are you serious?

Speaking of low IQ…
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44214 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:55 am to
Why do you want Iran to have nukes?
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44214 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:56 am to
So, just for clarity, you support Iran having a nuke?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299017 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Why do you want Iran to have nukes?


"The long peace."

When MAGA was conservative, they too understood the value of self-defense.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
37056 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:59 am to
quote:

I can't wait to hear the Tucker defenders who claim he's just enlightened and the rest of us are idiots, try to reason with this one.



Anyone still supporting Tucker has hated America all along.
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 7:00 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68333 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:00 am to
MAGA now stands for $1.5 trillion defense budgets, middle east wars, and FISA surveillance. Is that evolving when he changes?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:01 am to
quote:

A nuclear weapon should be Iran’s number one national priority. It is seemingly the only deterrent to being steamrolled by the US/Israeli coalition.


I upvoted because I always enjoy you retardmaxxing.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:01 am to
Bunk makes a post in favor of the Ayrabs. Shocking.

It’s Mother’s Day week. Inshallah.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167199 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:02 am to
Call loomer a looney bin all day long...she trained from former govt experts to work at project Veritas.

She is a good researcher and detective.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:03 am to
She’s insane and hideously ugly.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13206 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:05 am to
quote:

So, just for clarity, you support Iran having a nuke?


I think conceptually an argument can be made for it. I think you can squint and see that the US/Saudi/Israeli/Gulf States interest against it is more about balance of power concerns than existential concerns.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173597 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:05 am to
You should always take Loomer seriously

It's a sign that you're a well adjusted person
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23736 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:08 am to
I can't understand how anyone can't agree that Iran shouldn't have a nuke based on their irrational, murderous, and savage history as a terrorist state.
Israel wasn't strapping bombs to their people and blowing up public areas full of innocent people.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19442 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:08 am to
Roger, Powerbottom and Bunkfig in the same thread...



....we are all in hell now.

Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68333 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:09 am to
The argument is the North Korea model works to keep people from messing with you.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram