- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:08 pm to captdalton
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:08 pm to captdalton
quote:
You think that you and Hank have taken the high ground
High ground? No. Stance based in reality? Yes.
If that's what you meant by "high ground" then I agree and apologize.
quote:
and are now looking down at all the dumb rednecks and peasants who are just too stupid to understand your vapid arguments.
No. I think it's more emotional thinking and group identity than intelligence.
I've only called people (or their arguments) dumb when they make dumb points.
I've given everyone the opportunity to denounce lunacy like Q without judgment.
quote:
All the while, absolutely everyone else is looking up wondering “why did those two pedophile groomers climb a tree?”.
If they want to live dishonestly, that's their problem.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Duped…how?
That I feared the government would use laws on the books to invade our lives? I mean...that actually happened.
And that development occurred because of the intentional lies fed to us by our nation’s public health apparatus about the threat posed by the virus.
The harlots in the regime approved media decried anyone who dared challenge mask mandates and lockdowns as anti-scientific retrogrades — if not genocidal maniacs.
Too many citizens were overcome by paroxysms of fear over the threat to public health posed by the virus and complacently complied with CDC “guidelines” with disastrous results for both the well being of the economy and even public health itself.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 6:13 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
The harlots in the regime approved media decried anyone who dared challenge mask mandates and lockdowns
My post was before either, so how can it (in any way) apply to either?
Again, what was your point in posting that? My post was about fearing government overreach, and you posted it in response to another post about vaccines. You still haven't explained your "logic" involved or what you were trying to prove
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I express myself like the educated adult that I am.
You talk like a 14 year old girl.
You would not understand.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:05 pm to AggieHank86
“I express myself like the educated adult that I am.”
More like a bad script writer in a teen drama.
More like a bad script writer in a teen drama.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If they want to live dishonestly, that's their problem.
The issue is never the issue, the issue is aways the revolution
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Actually, Rog, the issue is people dishonestly calling non-pedos, pedos. 
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Actually, Rog, the issue is people dishonestly calling non-pedos, pedos.
Pedo adjacent
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:38 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I express myself like the educated adult that I am.
Biter old narcissist living alone.
Hold that education dear. Maybe it will provide solace
as death approaches.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Pedo adjacent

Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Actually, Rog, the issue is people dishonestly calling non-pedos, pedos.
Have you changed one mind with your hundreds of posts
in attempting to downplay child trafficking ?
You have been in such a fury I doubt you have stopped
to question this.
The answer is no. You have not.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Actually, Rog, the issue is people dishonestly calling non-pedos, pedos.
So are you begging for CP to be posted here? Seems an odd request on your part, very suspicious and in need of review.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:50 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
So are you begging for CP to be posted here?
What the frick? No.
quote:
Seems an odd request on your part, very suspicious and in need of review.
Like I said, Rog. The issue is people dishonestly calling non-pedos, pedos. Case in point.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My post was before either, so how can it (in any way) apply to either?
Again, what was your point in posting that? My post was about fearing government overreach, and you posted it in response to another post about vaccines. You still haven't explained your "logic" involved or what you were trying to prove
You were simply regurgitating mindless CDC fear porn in that thread and — willfully or not — serving as a dutiful tool for the very results you said you opposed.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:12 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
You were simply regurgitating mindless CDC fear porn in that thread
That did not exist in March of 2020
After my post, was there more state intervention? Remember lockdowns? Those CDC recommendations you were just referencing?
quote:
serving as a dutiful tool for the very results you said you opposed.
Yes, arguing for personal responsibility instead of state intervention...such a terrible thing to do.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You seem to be addressing anecdotes. I'm addressing wider experiences. Could you cite "macro" stats to back your premise?
My comments were about the macro.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Actually, Rog, the issue is people dishonestly calling non-pedos, pedos.
We are just so mean. And that whole “birds of a feather flock together” saying is just complete bullshite. The same with that saying “lay down with dogs, get up with fleas.” All those quant country euphemisms are just so 1990s.
Since they are just antiquated artifacts of the past, you are safe. Didn’t you argue something similar once? That historic norms shouldn’t necessarily be used to judge someone today? I swear I think I remember that. That isn’t verbatim; but that was the gist of your argument.
You are a great lawyer.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That did not exist in March of 2020
Claiming New Orleans was soon to turn into Italy was the very essence of promoting COVID-1984 fear porn.
quote:
Yes, arguing for personal responsibility instead of state intervention...such a terrible thing to do.
Likewise, promoting the unprecedented mandates and lockdowns was — IMO — the opposite of demonstrating “personal responsibility” but indeed was irresponsible because those measures undoubtedly exacerbated the public health crisis that this nation has experienced the past few years.
Yet those arguing against such measures were shouted down in the public square as menaces to public health — if not national security.
And btw, even though you think I’m a Q-tard and I think you are a statist boot-licker, I just realized that despite our ugly disagreements here and elsewhere, you and I seem to be having an actual conversation in the last few exchanges without calling each others names.
We certainly can’t have that! You ego-inflated varlet!
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:05 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You seem to be addressing anecdotes.
Bro this was a central part of your last post
quote:
as in the accounts of Rosa and Maria
quote:
I'm addressing wider experiences.
No you literally used anecdotes.
quote:
Could you cite "macro" stats to back your premise?
Sure. For which premise, specifically?
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:09 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Claiming New Orleans was soon to turn into Italy was the very essence of promoting COVID-1984 fear porn.
New Orleans literally became the epicenter of CV19 in the USA shortly after that post
quote:
promoting the unprecedented mandates and lockdowns was — IMO — the opposite of demonstrating “personal responsibility”
Sure, but I didn't do either.
I never supported government-enforced mandates or lockdowns. In fact, I specifically argued against both.
quote:
Yet those arguing against such measures were shouted down in the public square as menaces to public health — if not national security.
Sure, Lots of people defriended me on FB b/c I wouldn't be quiet.
quote:
even though you think I’m a Q-tard
I actually don't. I think your dishonesty is from other motivations.
quote:
I think you are a statist boot-licker,
Then you don't know what "statist" means.
Popular
Back to top



1




