Started By
Message

re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"

Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:48 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135220 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Define "powerful people".

It was your terminology. Looked like wiggle words to me, but I'm fine w/ that. You normally have facts on hand. Just interested in what they are.
quote:

it's hard to get evidence from activity that doesn't exist
Well, we know it exists. It is just a question as to frequency. Right?

Children account for 27% of all the human trafficking victims worldwide, and two out of every three child victims are girls.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39153 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:49 am to
How is a film trying to stop human trafficking?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Just curious what your overall argument is in this thread.


I'll post something I just wrote in the M/TV sister thread:

quote:

The real dishonesty involved (and I'm not claiming you are doing this, but others IIT have) is the "yes and" game. Everyone agrees that trafficking is bad and child sex trafficking is the worst form of it, except there is a population who uses this as a Trojan Horse to promote utter nonsense about ritualistic sexual abuse and sacrifice of American minors for Satanic/Moloch .

That's why being very precise with exactly what is being discussed is important, because before you know it, you're supporting literal insanity. That's why even dishonest arguments like "the child sex trade is surpassing the illegal arms trade" have to be called out. Human trafficking has surpassed the illegal arms trade by some reports. However, as we just discussed, child sex trade is a minute portion of this industry. They use a bit of truth dishonestly to attempt a larger point, because they have ulterior movies (or are NPCs spouting talking points like sheep).

That's why they have to rely on shame-based tactics of full adherence, where any question means they accuse you of supporting child sex trafficking or being a pedo yourself.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:53 am to
quote:

you are saying that human trafficking is bad, but that child trafficking, and specifically child sex trafficking, is inflated to make it seem more of an issue than it really is. Fair assessment, or no?
I cannot speak for SFP, but that is certainly the way I see the matter.

it is like many of the issues that send this board into a tizzy. They see an issue that is real, but with a frequency of one instance in a million, and they convinced themselves that it is one instance in a hundred … and that it is some sort of existential threat, rather than a mere aberration.
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 8:56 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39153 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:54 am to
Good post. Without looking, I'd suspect a large portion of human trafficking involves the Gulf Arab countries.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:56 am to
quote:

It was your terminology

I understand, but dishonest actors have tried to strawman it.

See: Page 1 of this thread:

quote:

Let's all remember that the most important thing here is that there is no cabal of rich and powerful people involved in this sex trafficking. It just happens naturally with no profit motive or rich clientele involved whatsoever!

-SFP, probably


quote:

Well, we know it exists

A cabal of powerful people trafficking kids? No. We don't.

quote:

Children account for 27% of all the human trafficking victims worldwide, and two out of every three child victims are girls.

Those victims are primarily trafficked by organized crimes groups, not powerful people (hence why the definitions is important). Dishonest actors are trying to make "powerful people" mean random organized criminal groups in random countries, which is not what's being discussed.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 8:58 am to
quote:

I'd suspect a large portion of human trafficking involves the Gulf Arab countries.

Primarily Asia and Eastern Europe and Africa (depending on how far back we use the term, b/c they rely on forced military service).
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:09 am to
quote:

They see an issue that is real, but with a frequency of one instance in a million, and they convinced themselves that it is one instance in a hundred … and that it is some sort of existential threat, rather than a mere aberration.


It's because they're subject to moral panics and have gone too far down the Q well to admit how silly they looked in 2020.

They just lie about their intentions and feign outrage to being linked to Q. imjustafatkid couldn't keep his Q shieled up last night though and revealed his true intentions

That's why this movie is being linked to QAnon.

Hell, it's gotten to the point (and I almost made this thread yesterday) that I think Q is legitimately a Leftist psyop utilized to tarnish Patriots and Trump supporters by making them look even crazier.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14359 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:13 am to
No idea how you could say this is Q-adjacent. I watched the movie and Hillary didn’t get arrested even one time.
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
16781 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:15 am to
quote:

How is a film trying to stop human trafficking?



By shining a light on maybe?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293561 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:16 am to
quote:

How is a film trying to stop human trafficking?


Most likely trying to raise awareness among you childless figs who know more about raising kids than anyone.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:18 am to
quote:

By shining a light on maybe?

Who doesn't know human trafficking exists?

Have you never heard of Blood Diamond?



How did you miss Kony 2012?



In fact, This article highlights the exact paradigm we've experienced on this site:

quote:

Why that happened, and what the episode says about human nature, is the subject of a somewhat pessimistic new paper. It concludes that examining a tough issue in its full complexity dampens emotional involvement on the part of the public, which gets more aroused by black-and-white portrayals of clear-cut enemies.


quote:

A “more nuanced” look at the situation, it reasserted the importance of apprehending Kony, but added that his capture “was only one (however important) step in improving the life of people in the central African regions where he has operated.”

It failed to go viral, receiving relatively little Internet traffic.


quote:

But as much as we like to believe that defeating one evil person will solve our problems, that isn’t the way the world generally works. This research suggests acknowledging that reality saps our enthusiasm for action, and that the most inspiring campaigns are also the most simplistic ones.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

who know more about raising kids than anyone.


What does raising children in America have to do with international human trafficking?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:27 am to
quote:

examining a tough issue in its full complexity dampens emotional involvement on the part of the public, which gets more aroused by black-and-white portrayals of clear-cut enemies.
How many times have you and I each been actively attacked by “the public” of this forum, for setting emotion aside and engaging in exactly that sort of rational examination of an issue?

A significant number of our posters affirmatively believe that it is a “good thing“ to be led around by “the feels.”
Posted by Cobbvol
Member since Jun 2020
246 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:28 am to
Looks like the left-media got their marching orders ...

LINK

LINK

LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:28 am to
quote:

How many times have you and I each been actively attacked by “the public” of this forum, for setting emotion aside and engaging in exactly that sort of rational examination of an issue?

While having emotionally raging people scream about how they rely on facts and logic and not emotion
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Looks like the left-media got their marching orders ...


quote:

“No, he doesn’t hide it at all. And you have a lot of people who are in this world of QAnon who say, oh, they don’t know what that is. They’ve never heard of it. They’re just asking questions,” Rothschild said. “With somebody like Jim Caviezel, he is openly embracing and he’s openly using its catchphrases and its concepts. He’s speaking at QAnon conventions. And this film is being marketed to either specific QAnon believers or to people who believe all of the same tenets as QAnon, but claim they don’t know what it is.”

“And ‘The Sound of Freedom’ does focus on a real issue of sex trafficking. But that theme, it’s sort of like that kernel of truth that feeds the QAnon conspiracy theory. Tell us how those two things work together,” Phillip invited him to elaborate.

The author eagerly complied, “Sure, and the most durable and the most believable conspiracy theories are not entirely false. There’s something in them that is true and the rest of it is false, but the believers point to the one true thing and they say, oh, you don’t believe that this particular thing is true. In terms of child trafficking, we know trafficking is real.”

“We know it has real victims. No one is denying that, but these films are created out of moral panics. They’re created out of bogus statistics. They’re created out of fear,” Rothschild without offering up any examples of the “bogus statistics” that he referred to.

“And with something like ‘Sound of Freedom’, it specifically is looking at QAnon concepts of these child trafficking rings that are run by the high-level elites and only people like Tim Ballard and only people like Jim Caviezel, and by extension, only people like the ticket buyer can help bring these trafficking rings down,” he added. “So, there’s a very participatory element. You’re not just going to see a movie, you’re just killing two hours on a hot day. You are helping bring down these pedophile rings and save children. Now, it’s not true, but it’s a very comforting and it’s a very warm feeling to have.”


Those aren't truth bombs. Those as truth nukes.
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 9:32 am
Posted by Cobbvol
Member since Jun 2020
246 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:35 am to
CNN welcomed author Mike Rothschild, a self-proclaimed expert on the whacky QAnon conspiracy theory/psyop that Democrats and their stooges have effectively used to paint conservatives
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464649 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:42 am to
Thanks for showing the undercurrent of conspiracy theories with the supporters of this movie, yet again
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11824 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 9:44 am to
You seriously read that and thought “truth nukes”

The moral panic isn’t coming from people going to see the movie…
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 49
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 49Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram