Started By
Message

re: Trump’s plan for student loans is solid

Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:52 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135805 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Loan forgiveness after 180 months
EXCUSE ME?

Why should I have to foot my kids' education bills, only then to fund yours?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:52 am to
quote:

You’re using the term moral hazard incorrectly.
I am using it correctly.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Loan forgiveness after 180 months for all students instead of just public servants
Why should non-borrowers shoulder the burden for borrowers mistakes?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:55 am to
quote:

We don’t, and no part of the proposals presented by trump would lead to that conclusion. Read them before getting angry, because you are way, way off here.
*yawn* wasn’t commenting on the proposal, but rather the larger idea that subsidizing unproductive education is a good idea.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8972 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:55 am to
Very, very wrong. If we want citizens who will be competitive in modern markets, they absolutely have to be familiar with the technology firms are using. That classroom is all that’s needed for gender studies degrees, but we want to move away from those. If you want to be an engineer or an accountant, or an economist, you better be familiar with computer programs.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:56 am to
quote:

That room is far nicer than 99% of the university classrooms i have been in


Where did you go to university?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44435 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:56 am to
Proggies gonna proggy.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8972 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:56 am to
Do you know what a positive externality is?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:57 am to
quote:

If we want citizens who will be competitive in modern markets, they absolutely have to be familiar with the technology firms are using.
This means a laptop and an internet connection. No classroom needed at all.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8972 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:58 am to
You keep throwing out buzzwords and catch phrases that you clearly don’t understand
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Do you know what a positive externality is?
I do. It’s second-order bullshite. If “society” has a benefit to an individuals education it can only occur if the individuals benefit first.

If the “investment” was beneficial to those individuals hey’d be able to pay their loans back and would do so happily because they benefitted from the expense.

Try to keep up.
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
15924 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:01 am to
quote:

(2) Allow student loans to be discharged in bankruptcy forcing lenders to vet the school, course of study, and academic qualifications of the borrower.


There are two issues with this. First off, I do not believe private lenders are involved in student loans anymore.

Since that is the case the second issue will never happen, but this idea would be called racist.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:01 am to
quote:

You keep throwing out buzzwords and catch phrases that you clearly don’t understand
you were the one that brought them up.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8972 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:03 am to
Moral hazard is the lack of incentive to guard against risk because you are protected from consequences. You said...
quote:

We’ve removed the moral hazard of education spending by subsidizing it so heavily.
Removing the moral hazard means re-exposing people to the consequences of their risky actions, something does not happen when you subsidize education. If anything, we have added moral hazard to education.


You are definitely using the term incorrectly.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467780 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I don’t see why schools should be responsible for people’s life choices.

they benefit most from this government subsidy/scheme, so why shouldn't they have skin in the game?
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8972 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:04 am to
Agreed, and I’m extremely excited about the potential that digital education offers. But poster I was responding to said the only thing needed for education was a chalkboard and some desks. That’s 1950s style shite, and grossly outdated.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:05 am to
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44435 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:07 am to
And I don't think he was talking about the things you are referring to.

I would venture to guess his criticisms center around how universities these days have become luxurious playgrounds with massive, bloated administrations.


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Moral hazard is the lack of incentive to guard against risk because you are protected from consequences.
Yes.

quote:

You said...We’ve removed the moral hazard of education spending by subsidizing it so heavily.
Also correct.

Because of the availability of “free” money that has to be repaid at far below market and risk-based rates (removal of consequences) it’s really easy to borrow money to obtain a completely economically unproductive degree. This causes many to ignore the risk (repayment) they are taking on.

quote:

You are definitely using the term incorrectly.
Definitely not.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:09 am to
quote:

You don’t see why schools should share in any part of the responsibility for exploiting naive 18 year olds?


Why isn’t your government that you are looking to for solutions educating these kids when they are 17 about economics and loans?
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 10:10 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram